Cargando…

Apps and eating disorders: A systematic clinical appraisal

OBJECTIVE: Smartphone applications (apps) are proliferating and health‐related apps are particularly popular. The aim of this study was to identify, characterize, and evaluate the clinical utility of apps designed either for people with eating disorders or for eating disorder professionals. METHOD:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fairburn, Christopher G., Rothwell, Emily R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4737215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25728705
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eat.22398
_version_ 1782413441646985216
author Fairburn, Christopher G.
Rothwell, Emily R.
author_facet Fairburn, Christopher G.
Rothwell, Emily R.
author_sort Fairburn, Christopher G.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Smartphone applications (apps) are proliferating and health‐related apps are particularly popular. The aim of this study was to identify, characterize, and evaluate the clinical utility of apps designed either for people with eating disorders or for eating disorder professionals. METHOD: A search of the major app stores identified 805 potentially relevant apps, of which 39 were primarily designed for people with eating disorders and five for professionals. RESULTS: The apps for people with eating disorders had four main functions. Most common was the provision of advice, the quality of which ranged from sound to potentially harmful. Five apps included self‐assessment tools but only two used methods that would generally be viewed as reliable. Four apps had the self‐monitoring of eating habits as a major feature. Entering information into these apps could be accomplished with varying degrees of ease, but viewing it was more difficult. One app allowed the transfer of information between patients and clinicians. DISCUSSION: The enthusiasm for apps outstrips the evidence supporting their use. Given their popularity, it is suggested that clinicians evaluate app use as part of routine assessment. The clinical utility of the existing apps is not clear. Some are capable of tracking key features over time, but none has the functions required for analytic self‐monitoring as in cognitive behavioral treatments. The full potential of apps has yet to be realized. Specialized apps could be designed to augment various forms of treatment, and there is the possibility that they could deliver an entire personalized intervention. © 2015 The Authors. International Journal of Eating Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. (Int J Eat Disord 2015; 48:1038–1046)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4737215
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47372152016-02-18 Apps and eating disorders: A systematic clinical appraisal Fairburn, Christopher G. Rothwell, Emily R. Int J Eat Disord Empirical Articles OBJECTIVE: Smartphone applications (apps) are proliferating and health‐related apps are particularly popular. The aim of this study was to identify, characterize, and evaluate the clinical utility of apps designed either for people with eating disorders or for eating disorder professionals. METHOD: A search of the major app stores identified 805 potentially relevant apps, of which 39 were primarily designed for people with eating disorders and five for professionals. RESULTS: The apps for people with eating disorders had four main functions. Most common was the provision of advice, the quality of which ranged from sound to potentially harmful. Five apps included self‐assessment tools but only two used methods that would generally be viewed as reliable. Four apps had the self‐monitoring of eating habits as a major feature. Entering information into these apps could be accomplished with varying degrees of ease, but viewing it was more difficult. One app allowed the transfer of information between patients and clinicians. DISCUSSION: The enthusiasm for apps outstrips the evidence supporting their use. Given their popularity, it is suggested that clinicians evaluate app use as part of routine assessment. The clinical utility of the existing apps is not clear. Some are capable of tracking key features over time, but none has the functions required for analytic self‐monitoring as in cognitive behavioral treatments. The full potential of apps has yet to be realized. Specialized apps could be designed to augment various forms of treatment, and there is the possibility that they could deliver an entire personalized intervention. © 2015 The Authors. International Journal of Eating Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. (Int J Eat Disord 2015; 48:1038–1046) John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-02-27 2015-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4737215/ /pubmed/25728705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eat.22398 Text en © 2015 The Authors. International Journal of Eating Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Empirical Articles
Fairburn, Christopher G.
Rothwell, Emily R.
Apps and eating disorders: A systematic clinical appraisal
title Apps and eating disorders: A systematic clinical appraisal
title_full Apps and eating disorders: A systematic clinical appraisal
title_fullStr Apps and eating disorders: A systematic clinical appraisal
title_full_unstemmed Apps and eating disorders: A systematic clinical appraisal
title_short Apps and eating disorders: A systematic clinical appraisal
title_sort apps and eating disorders: a systematic clinical appraisal
topic Empirical Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4737215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25728705
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eat.22398
work_keys_str_mv AT fairburnchristopherg appsandeatingdisordersasystematicclinicalappraisal
AT rothwellemilyr appsandeatingdisordersasystematicclinicalappraisal