Cargando…

Metastatic lymph node ratio, 6th or 7th AJCC edition: witch is the best lymph node classification for esophageal cancer? Prognosis factor analysis in 487 patients

BACKGROUND: The esophageal cancer is one of the most common and aggressive worldwide. Recently, the AJCC changed the staging system, considering, among others, the important role of the lymph node metastasis on the prognosis. AIM: To discuss the applicability of different forms of lymph node staging...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: CORAL, Roberto V., BIGOLIN, André V., CORAL, Roberto P., HARTMANN, Antonio, DRANKA, Carolina, ROEHE, Adriana V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4737327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26176242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-67202015000200002
_version_ 1782413464536350720
author CORAL, Roberto V.
BIGOLIN, André V.
CORAL, Roberto P.
HARTMANN, Antonio
DRANKA, Carolina
ROEHE, Adriana V.
author_facet CORAL, Roberto V.
BIGOLIN, André V.
CORAL, Roberto P.
HARTMANN, Antonio
DRANKA, Carolina
ROEHE, Adriana V.
author_sort CORAL, Roberto V.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The esophageal cancer is one of the most common and aggressive worldwide. Recently, the AJCC changed the staging system, considering, among others, the important role of the lymph node metastasis on the prognosis. AIM: To discuss the applicability of different forms of lymph node staging in a western surgical center. METHODS: Four hundred eighty seven patients with esophageal cancer were enrolled. Three staging systems were evaluated, the 6(th) and the 7(th) AJCC editions and the Lymph Node Metastatic Ratio. RESULTS: The majority of the cases were squamous cell carcinoma. The mean lymph node sample was eight. Considering the survival, there was no significant difference between the patients when they were classified by the 7(th) AJCC edition. Analysis of the Lymph Node Metastatic Ratio, just on the group of patients with 0 to 25%, has shown significant difference (p=0,01). The 6(th) AJCC edition shows the major significant difference between among the classifications evaluated. CONCLUSION: In this specific population, the 7(th) AJCC edition for esophageal cancer was not able to find differences in survival when just the lymph node analysis was considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4737327
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47373272016-02-24 Metastatic lymph node ratio, 6th or 7th AJCC edition: witch is the best lymph node classification for esophageal cancer? Prognosis factor analysis in 487 patients CORAL, Roberto V. BIGOLIN, André V. CORAL, Roberto P. HARTMANN, Antonio DRANKA, Carolina ROEHE, Adriana V. Arq Bras Cir Dig Original Article BACKGROUND: The esophageal cancer is one of the most common and aggressive worldwide. Recently, the AJCC changed the staging system, considering, among others, the important role of the lymph node metastasis on the prognosis. AIM: To discuss the applicability of different forms of lymph node staging in a western surgical center. METHODS: Four hundred eighty seven patients with esophageal cancer were enrolled. Three staging systems were evaluated, the 6(th) and the 7(th) AJCC editions and the Lymph Node Metastatic Ratio. RESULTS: The majority of the cases were squamous cell carcinoma. The mean lymph node sample was eight. Considering the survival, there was no significant difference between the patients when they were classified by the 7(th) AJCC edition. Analysis of the Lymph Node Metastatic Ratio, just on the group of patients with 0 to 25%, has shown significant difference (p=0,01). The 6(th) AJCC edition shows the major significant difference between among the classifications evaluated. CONCLUSION: In this specific population, the 7(th) AJCC edition for esophageal cancer was not able to find differences in survival when just the lymph node analysis was considered. Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4737327/ /pubmed/26176242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-67202015000200002 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
CORAL, Roberto V.
BIGOLIN, André V.
CORAL, Roberto P.
HARTMANN, Antonio
DRANKA, Carolina
ROEHE, Adriana V.
Metastatic lymph node ratio, 6th or 7th AJCC edition: witch is the best lymph node classification for esophageal cancer? Prognosis factor analysis in 487 patients
title Metastatic lymph node ratio, 6th or 7th AJCC edition: witch is the best lymph node classification for esophageal cancer? Prognosis factor analysis in 487 patients
title_full Metastatic lymph node ratio, 6th or 7th AJCC edition: witch is the best lymph node classification for esophageal cancer? Prognosis factor analysis in 487 patients
title_fullStr Metastatic lymph node ratio, 6th or 7th AJCC edition: witch is the best lymph node classification for esophageal cancer? Prognosis factor analysis in 487 patients
title_full_unstemmed Metastatic lymph node ratio, 6th or 7th AJCC edition: witch is the best lymph node classification for esophageal cancer? Prognosis factor analysis in 487 patients
title_short Metastatic lymph node ratio, 6th or 7th AJCC edition: witch is the best lymph node classification for esophageal cancer? Prognosis factor analysis in 487 patients
title_sort metastatic lymph node ratio, 6th or 7th ajcc edition: witch is the best lymph node classification for esophageal cancer? prognosis factor analysis in 487 patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4737327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26176242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-67202015000200002
work_keys_str_mv AT coralrobertov metastaticlymphnoderatio6thor7thajcceditionwitchisthebestlymphnodeclassificationforesophagealcancerprognosisfactoranalysisin487patients
AT bigolinandrev metastaticlymphnoderatio6thor7thajcceditionwitchisthebestlymphnodeclassificationforesophagealcancerprognosisfactoranalysisin487patients
AT coralrobertop metastaticlymphnoderatio6thor7thajcceditionwitchisthebestlymphnodeclassificationforesophagealcancerprognosisfactoranalysisin487patients
AT hartmannantonio metastaticlymphnoderatio6thor7thajcceditionwitchisthebestlymphnodeclassificationforesophagealcancerprognosisfactoranalysisin487patients
AT drankacarolina metastaticlymphnoderatio6thor7thajcceditionwitchisthebestlymphnodeclassificationforesophagealcancerprognosisfactoranalysisin487patients
AT roeheadrianav metastaticlymphnoderatio6thor7thajcceditionwitchisthebestlymphnodeclassificationforesophagealcancerprognosisfactoranalysisin487patients