Cargando…

Species‐specific action of (Pro3)GIP – a full agonist at human GIP receptors, but a partial agonist and competitive antagonist at rat and mouse GIP receptors

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Specific, high potency receptor antagonists are valuable tools when evaluating animal and human physiology. Within the glucose‐dependent, insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) system, considerable attention has been given to the presumed GIP receptor antagonist, (Pro3)GIP, and its...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sparre‐Ulrich, A H, Hansen, L S, Svendsen, B, Christensen, M, Knop, F K, Hartmann, B, Holst, J J, Rosenkilde, M M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4737396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26359804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.13323
_version_ 1782413475707879424
author Sparre‐Ulrich, A H
Hansen, L S
Svendsen, B
Christensen, M
Knop, F K
Hartmann, B
Holst, J J
Rosenkilde, M M
author_facet Sparre‐Ulrich, A H
Hansen, L S
Svendsen, B
Christensen, M
Knop, F K
Hartmann, B
Holst, J J
Rosenkilde, M M
author_sort Sparre‐Ulrich, A H
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Specific, high potency receptor antagonists are valuable tools when evaluating animal and human physiology. Within the glucose‐dependent, insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) system, considerable attention has been given to the presumed GIP receptor antagonist, (Pro3)GIP, and its effect in murine studies. We conducted a pharmacological analysis of this ligand including interspecies differences between the rodent and human GIP system. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Transiently transfected COS‐7 cells were assessed for cAMP accumulation upon ligand stimulation and assayed in competition binding using (125)I‐human GIP. Using isolated perfused pancreata both from wild type and GIP receptor‐deficient rodents, insulin‐releasing, glucagon‐releasing and somatostatin‐releasing properties in response to species‐specific GIP and (Pro3)GIP analogues were evaluated. KEY RESULTS: Human (Pro3)GIP is a full agonist at human GIP receptors with similar efficacy (E (max)) for cAMP production as human GIP, while both rat and mouse(Pro3)GIP were partial agonists on their corresponding receptors. Rodent GIPs are more potent and efficacious at their receptors than human GIP. In perfused pancreata in the presence of 7 mM glucose, both rodent (Pro3)GIP analogues induced modest insulin, glucagon and somatostatin secretion, corresponding to the partial agonist activities observed in cAMP production. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: When evaluating new compounds, it is important to consider interspecies differences both at the receptor and ligand level. Thus, in rodent models, human GIP is a comparatively weak partial agonist. Human (Pro3)GIP was not an antagonist at human GIP receptors, so there is still a need for a potent antagonist in order to elucidate the physiology of human GIP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4737396
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47373962016-02-12 Species‐specific action of (Pro3)GIP – a full agonist at human GIP receptors, but a partial agonist and competitive antagonist at rat and mouse GIP receptors Sparre‐Ulrich, A H Hansen, L S Svendsen, B Christensen, M Knop, F K Hartmann, B Holst, J J Rosenkilde, M M Br J Pharmacol Research Papers BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Specific, high potency receptor antagonists are valuable tools when evaluating animal and human physiology. Within the glucose‐dependent, insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) system, considerable attention has been given to the presumed GIP receptor antagonist, (Pro3)GIP, and its effect in murine studies. We conducted a pharmacological analysis of this ligand including interspecies differences between the rodent and human GIP system. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Transiently transfected COS‐7 cells were assessed for cAMP accumulation upon ligand stimulation and assayed in competition binding using (125)I‐human GIP. Using isolated perfused pancreata both from wild type and GIP receptor‐deficient rodents, insulin‐releasing, glucagon‐releasing and somatostatin‐releasing properties in response to species‐specific GIP and (Pro3)GIP analogues were evaluated. KEY RESULTS: Human (Pro3)GIP is a full agonist at human GIP receptors with similar efficacy (E (max)) for cAMP production as human GIP, while both rat and mouse(Pro3)GIP were partial agonists on their corresponding receptors. Rodent GIPs are more potent and efficacious at their receptors than human GIP. In perfused pancreata in the presence of 7 mM glucose, both rodent (Pro3)GIP analogues induced modest insulin, glucagon and somatostatin secretion, corresponding to the partial agonist activities observed in cAMP production. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: When evaluating new compounds, it is important to consider interspecies differences both at the receptor and ligand level. Thus, in rodent models, human GIP is a comparatively weak partial agonist. Human (Pro3)GIP was not an antagonist at human GIP receptors, so there is still a need for a potent antagonist in order to elucidate the physiology of human GIP. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-11-20 2016-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4737396/ /pubmed/26359804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.13323 Text en © 2015 The Authors. British Journal of Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Papers
Sparre‐Ulrich, A H
Hansen, L S
Svendsen, B
Christensen, M
Knop, F K
Hartmann, B
Holst, J J
Rosenkilde, M M
Species‐specific action of (Pro3)GIP – a full agonist at human GIP receptors, but a partial agonist and competitive antagonist at rat and mouse GIP receptors
title Species‐specific action of (Pro3)GIP – a full agonist at human GIP receptors, but a partial agonist and competitive antagonist at rat and mouse GIP receptors
title_full Species‐specific action of (Pro3)GIP – a full agonist at human GIP receptors, but a partial agonist and competitive antagonist at rat and mouse GIP receptors
title_fullStr Species‐specific action of (Pro3)GIP – a full agonist at human GIP receptors, but a partial agonist and competitive antagonist at rat and mouse GIP receptors
title_full_unstemmed Species‐specific action of (Pro3)GIP – a full agonist at human GIP receptors, but a partial agonist and competitive antagonist at rat and mouse GIP receptors
title_short Species‐specific action of (Pro3)GIP – a full agonist at human GIP receptors, but a partial agonist and competitive antagonist at rat and mouse GIP receptors
title_sort species‐specific action of (pro3)gip – a full agonist at human gip receptors, but a partial agonist and competitive antagonist at rat and mouse gip receptors
topic Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4737396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26359804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.13323
work_keys_str_mv AT sparreulrichah speciesspecificactionofpro3gipafullagonistathumangipreceptorsbutapartialagonistandcompetitiveantagonistatratandmousegipreceptors
AT hansenls speciesspecificactionofpro3gipafullagonistathumangipreceptorsbutapartialagonistandcompetitiveantagonistatratandmousegipreceptors
AT svendsenb speciesspecificactionofpro3gipafullagonistathumangipreceptorsbutapartialagonistandcompetitiveantagonistatratandmousegipreceptors
AT christensenm speciesspecificactionofpro3gipafullagonistathumangipreceptorsbutapartialagonistandcompetitiveantagonistatratandmousegipreceptors
AT knopfk speciesspecificactionofpro3gipafullagonistathumangipreceptorsbutapartialagonistandcompetitiveantagonistatratandmousegipreceptors
AT hartmannb speciesspecificactionofpro3gipafullagonistathumangipreceptorsbutapartialagonistandcompetitiveantagonistatratandmousegipreceptors
AT holstjj speciesspecificactionofpro3gipafullagonistathumangipreceptorsbutapartialagonistandcompetitiveantagonistatratandmousegipreceptors
AT rosenkildemm speciesspecificactionofpro3gipafullagonistathumangipreceptorsbutapartialagonistandcompetitiveantagonistatratandmousegipreceptors