Cargando…

Evaluation of immunogenicity of LY2963016 insulin glargine compared with Lantus® insulin glargine in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus

AIMS: To compare the immunogenicity profiles and the potential effects on clinical outcomes of LY2963016 insulin glargine (LY IGlar) and Lantus® insulin glargine (IGlar), products with identical primary amino acid sequences, in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T1DM or T2DM). METHODS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ilag, L. L., Deeg, M. A., Costigan, T., Hollander, P., Blevins, T. C., Edelman, S. V., Konrad, R. J., Ortmann, R. A., Pollom, R. K., Huster, W. J., Zielonka, J. S., Prince, M. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4737399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26434665
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dom.12584
_version_ 1782413476153524224
author Ilag, L. L.
Deeg, M. A.
Costigan, T.
Hollander, P.
Blevins, T. C.
Edelman, S. V.
Konrad, R. J.
Ortmann, R. A.
Pollom, R. K.
Huster, W. J.
Zielonka, J. S.
Prince, M. J.
author_facet Ilag, L. L.
Deeg, M. A.
Costigan, T.
Hollander, P.
Blevins, T. C.
Edelman, S. V.
Konrad, R. J.
Ortmann, R. A.
Pollom, R. K.
Huster, W. J.
Zielonka, J. S.
Prince, M. J.
author_sort Ilag, L. L.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To compare the immunogenicity profiles and the potential effects on clinical outcomes of LY2963016 insulin glargine (LY IGlar) and Lantus® insulin glargine (IGlar), products with identical primary amino acid sequences, in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T1DM or T2DM). METHODS: To assess immunogenicity, anti‐insulin glargine antibodies (measured as percent binding) were compared between treatments in 52‐week (open‐label) and 24‐week (double‐blind) randomized studies in total study populations of patients with T1DM (N = 535) and T2DM (N = 756), respectively, and two subgroups of patients with T2DM: insulin‐naïve patients and those reporting prestudy IGlar treatment (prior IGlar). Relationships between insulin antibody levels and clinical outcomes were assessed using analysis of covariance and partial correlations. Insulin antibody levels were assessed using Wilcoxon rank sum. Treatment comparisons for treatment‐emergent antibody response (TEAR) and incidence of detectable antibodies were analysed using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: No significant treatment differences were observed for insulin antibody levels, incidence of detectable anti‐insulin glargine antibodies, or incidence of TEAR [overall and endpoint, by last‐observation‐carried‐forward (LOCF)] in patients with T1DM or patients with T2DM, including the insulin‐naïve subgroup. A statistically significant difference was noted in the overall incidence of detectable antibodies but not at endpoint (LOCF) nor in TEAR for the prior IGlar subgroup of patients with T2DM. Insulin antibody levels were low (<5%) in both treatment groups. Insulin antibody levels or developing TEAR was not associated with clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: LY IGlar and IGlar have similar immunogenicity profiles; anti‐insulin glargine antibody levels were low for both treatments, with no observed effect on efficacy and safety outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4737399
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47373992016-02-12 Evaluation of immunogenicity of LY2963016 insulin glargine compared with Lantus® insulin glargine in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus Ilag, L. L. Deeg, M. A. Costigan, T. Hollander, P. Blevins, T. C. Edelman, S. V. Konrad, R. J. Ortmann, R. A. Pollom, R. K. Huster, W. J. Zielonka, J. S. Prince, M. J. Diabetes Obes Metab Original Articles AIMS: To compare the immunogenicity profiles and the potential effects on clinical outcomes of LY2963016 insulin glargine (LY IGlar) and Lantus® insulin glargine (IGlar), products with identical primary amino acid sequences, in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T1DM or T2DM). METHODS: To assess immunogenicity, anti‐insulin glargine antibodies (measured as percent binding) were compared between treatments in 52‐week (open‐label) and 24‐week (double‐blind) randomized studies in total study populations of patients with T1DM (N = 535) and T2DM (N = 756), respectively, and two subgroups of patients with T2DM: insulin‐naïve patients and those reporting prestudy IGlar treatment (prior IGlar). Relationships between insulin antibody levels and clinical outcomes were assessed using analysis of covariance and partial correlations. Insulin antibody levels were assessed using Wilcoxon rank sum. Treatment comparisons for treatment‐emergent antibody response (TEAR) and incidence of detectable antibodies were analysed using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: No significant treatment differences were observed for insulin antibody levels, incidence of detectable anti‐insulin glargine antibodies, or incidence of TEAR [overall and endpoint, by last‐observation‐carried‐forward (LOCF)] in patients with T1DM or patients with T2DM, including the insulin‐naïve subgroup. A statistically significant difference was noted in the overall incidence of detectable antibodies but not at endpoint (LOCF) nor in TEAR for the prior IGlar subgroup of patients with T2DM. Insulin antibody levels were low (<5%) in both treatment groups. Insulin antibody levels or developing TEAR was not associated with clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: LY IGlar and IGlar have similar immunogenicity profiles; anti‐insulin glargine antibody levels were low for both treatments, with no observed effect on efficacy and safety outcomes. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2016-01-08 2016-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4737399/ /pubmed/26434665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dom.12584 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Ilag, L. L.
Deeg, M. A.
Costigan, T.
Hollander, P.
Blevins, T. C.
Edelman, S. V.
Konrad, R. J.
Ortmann, R. A.
Pollom, R. K.
Huster, W. J.
Zielonka, J. S.
Prince, M. J.
Evaluation of immunogenicity of LY2963016 insulin glargine compared with Lantus® insulin glargine in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus
title Evaluation of immunogenicity of LY2963016 insulin glargine compared with Lantus® insulin glargine in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus
title_full Evaluation of immunogenicity of LY2963016 insulin glargine compared with Lantus® insulin glargine in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus
title_fullStr Evaluation of immunogenicity of LY2963016 insulin glargine compared with Lantus® insulin glargine in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of immunogenicity of LY2963016 insulin glargine compared with Lantus® insulin glargine in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus
title_short Evaluation of immunogenicity of LY2963016 insulin glargine compared with Lantus® insulin glargine in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus
title_sort evaluation of immunogenicity of ly2963016 insulin glargine compared with lantus® insulin glargine in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4737399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26434665
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dom.12584
work_keys_str_mv AT ilagll evaluationofimmunogenicityofly2963016insulinglarginecomparedwithlantusinsulinglargineinpatientswithtype1ortype2diabetesmellitus
AT deegma evaluationofimmunogenicityofly2963016insulinglarginecomparedwithlantusinsulinglargineinpatientswithtype1ortype2diabetesmellitus
AT costigant evaluationofimmunogenicityofly2963016insulinglarginecomparedwithlantusinsulinglargineinpatientswithtype1ortype2diabetesmellitus
AT hollanderp evaluationofimmunogenicityofly2963016insulinglarginecomparedwithlantusinsulinglargineinpatientswithtype1ortype2diabetesmellitus
AT blevinstc evaluationofimmunogenicityofly2963016insulinglarginecomparedwithlantusinsulinglargineinpatientswithtype1ortype2diabetesmellitus
AT edelmansv evaluationofimmunogenicityofly2963016insulinglarginecomparedwithlantusinsulinglargineinpatientswithtype1ortype2diabetesmellitus
AT konradrj evaluationofimmunogenicityofly2963016insulinglarginecomparedwithlantusinsulinglargineinpatientswithtype1ortype2diabetesmellitus
AT ortmannra evaluationofimmunogenicityofly2963016insulinglarginecomparedwithlantusinsulinglargineinpatientswithtype1ortype2diabetesmellitus
AT pollomrk evaluationofimmunogenicityofly2963016insulinglarginecomparedwithlantusinsulinglargineinpatientswithtype1ortype2diabetesmellitus
AT husterwj evaluationofimmunogenicityofly2963016insulinglarginecomparedwithlantusinsulinglargineinpatientswithtype1ortype2diabetesmellitus
AT zielonkajs evaluationofimmunogenicityofly2963016insulinglarginecomparedwithlantusinsulinglargineinpatientswithtype1ortype2diabetesmellitus
AT princemj evaluationofimmunogenicityofly2963016insulinglarginecomparedwithlantusinsulinglargineinpatientswithtype1ortype2diabetesmellitus