Cargando…
Efficacy of Tenofovir-Based Combination Therapy versus Tenofovir Monotherapy in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Presenting with Suboptimal Responses to Pretreatment: A Meta-Analysis
Background/Aims. It remains unclear whether tenofovir disoproxil fumarate- (TDF-) based combination therapy produces better outcomes than TDF monotherapy in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of the two regimens by performing a meta-analysis. Method...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4737451/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26880896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7214020 |
_version_ | 1782413480981168128 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Ling Wang, Xiwei Zhang, Qiongfang Gong, Jiaojiao Shen, Shasha Yin, Wenwei Hu, Huaidong |
author_facet | Chen, Ling Wang, Xiwei Zhang, Qiongfang Gong, Jiaojiao Shen, Shasha Yin, Wenwei Hu, Huaidong |
author_sort | Chen, Ling |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background/Aims. It remains unclear whether tenofovir disoproxil fumarate- (TDF-) based combination therapy produces better outcomes than TDF monotherapy in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of the two regimens by performing a meta-analysis. Methods. A comprehensive literature search was performed on the comparison of TDF-based combination therapy and monotherapy for CHB patients in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Libraries. Both dichotomous and continuous variables were extracted and pooled outcomes were expressed as risk ratio (RR) or standard mean difference (SMD). Results. Nine eligible studies (1089 subjects in total) were included in our analysis. The proportion of patients with undetectable HBV DNA at 24, 48, and 96 weeks were similar between the two comparable groups (62.5% versus 70.9%, P = 0.086; 78.1% versus 83.7%, P = 0.118; 86.4% versus 87.9%, P = 0.626, resp.). HBV DNA reduction, rates of ALT normalization, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) loss, and HBeAg seroconversion were also similar between the two groups. Conclusions. On the current data, TDF-based combination therapy seemed to be no better than those achieved by monotherapy. Further studies are needed to verify this comparison. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4737451 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47374512016-02-15 Efficacy of Tenofovir-Based Combination Therapy versus Tenofovir Monotherapy in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Presenting with Suboptimal Responses to Pretreatment: A Meta-Analysis Chen, Ling Wang, Xiwei Zhang, Qiongfang Gong, Jiaojiao Shen, Shasha Yin, Wenwei Hu, Huaidong Gastroenterol Res Pract Review Article Background/Aims. It remains unclear whether tenofovir disoproxil fumarate- (TDF-) based combination therapy produces better outcomes than TDF monotherapy in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of the two regimens by performing a meta-analysis. Methods. A comprehensive literature search was performed on the comparison of TDF-based combination therapy and monotherapy for CHB patients in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Libraries. Both dichotomous and continuous variables were extracted and pooled outcomes were expressed as risk ratio (RR) or standard mean difference (SMD). Results. Nine eligible studies (1089 subjects in total) were included in our analysis. The proportion of patients with undetectable HBV DNA at 24, 48, and 96 weeks were similar between the two comparable groups (62.5% versus 70.9%, P = 0.086; 78.1% versus 83.7%, P = 0.118; 86.4% versus 87.9%, P = 0.626, resp.). HBV DNA reduction, rates of ALT normalization, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) loss, and HBeAg seroconversion were also similar between the two groups. Conclusions. On the current data, TDF-based combination therapy seemed to be no better than those achieved by monotherapy. Further studies are needed to verify this comparison. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4737451/ /pubmed/26880896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7214020 Text en Copyright © 2016 Ling Chen et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Chen, Ling Wang, Xiwei Zhang, Qiongfang Gong, Jiaojiao Shen, Shasha Yin, Wenwei Hu, Huaidong Efficacy of Tenofovir-Based Combination Therapy versus Tenofovir Monotherapy in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Presenting with Suboptimal Responses to Pretreatment: A Meta-Analysis |
title | Efficacy of Tenofovir-Based Combination Therapy versus Tenofovir Monotherapy in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Presenting with Suboptimal Responses to Pretreatment: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Efficacy of Tenofovir-Based Combination Therapy versus Tenofovir Monotherapy in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Presenting with Suboptimal Responses to Pretreatment: A Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of Tenofovir-Based Combination Therapy versus Tenofovir Monotherapy in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Presenting with Suboptimal Responses to Pretreatment: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of Tenofovir-Based Combination Therapy versus Tenofovir Monotherapy in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Presenting with Suboptimal Responses to Pretreatment: A Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Efficacy of Tenofovir-Based Combination Therapy versus Tenofovir Monotherapy in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Presenting with Suboptimal Responses to Pretreatment: A Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | efficacy of tenofovir-based combination therapy versus tenofovir monotherapy in chronic hepatitis b patients presenting with suboptimal responses to pretreatment: a meta-analysis |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4737451/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26880896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7214020 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenling efficacyoftenofovirbasedcombinationtherapyversustenofovirmonotherapyinchronichepatitisbpatientspresentingwithsuboptimalresponsestopretreatmentametaanalysis AT wangxiwei efficacyoftenofovirbasedcombinationtherapyversustenofovirmonotherapyinchronichepatitisbpatientspresentingwithsuboptimalresponsestopretreatmentametaanalysis AT zhangqiongfang efficacyoftenofovirbasedcombinationtherapyversustenofovirmonotherapyinchronichepatitisbpatientspresentingwithsuboptimalresponsestopretreatmentametaanalysis AT gongjiaojiao efficacyoftenofovirbasedcombinationtherapyversustenofovirmonotherapyinchronichepatitisbpatientspresentingwithsuboptimalresponsestopretreatmentametaanalysis AT shenshasha efficacyoftenofovirbasedcombinationtherapyversustenofovirmonotherapyinchronichepatitisbpatientspresentingwithsuboptimalresponsestopretreatmentametaanalysis AT yinwenwei efficacyoftenofovirbasedcombinationtherapyversustenofovirmonotherapyinchronichepatitisbpatientspresentingwithsuboptimalresponsestopretreatmentametaanalysis AT huhuaidong efficacyoftenofovirbasedcombinationtherapyversustenofovirmonotherapyinchronichepatitisbpatientspresentingwithsuboptimalresponsestopretreatmentametaanalysis |