Cargando…

Efficacy of Tenofovir-Based Combination Therapy versus Tenofovir Monotherapy in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Presenting with Suboptimal Responses to Pretreatment: A Meta-Analysis

Background/Aims. It remains unclear whether tenofovir disoproxil fumarate- (TDF-) based combination therapy produces better outcomes than TDF monotherapy in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of the two regimens by performing a meta-analysis. Method...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Ling, Wang, Xiwei, Zhang, Qiongfang, Gong, Jiaojiao, Shen, Shasha, Yin, Wenwei, Hu, Huaidong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4737451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26880896
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7214020
_version_ 1782413480981168128
author Chen, Ling
Wang, Xiwei
Zhang, Qiongfang
Gong, Jiaojiao
Shen, Shasha
Yin, Wenwei
Hu, Huaidong
author_facet Chen, Ling
Wang, Xiwei
Zhang, Qiongfang
Gong, Jiaojiao
Shen, Shasha
Yin, Wenwei
Hu, Huaidong
author_sort Chen, Ling
collection PubMed
description Background/Aims. It remains unclear whether tenofovir disoproxil fumarate- (TDF-) based combination therapy produces better outcomes than TDF monotherapy in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of the two regimens by performing a meta-analysis. Methods. A comprehensive literature search was performed on the comparison of TDF-based combination therapy and monotherapy for CHB patients in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Libraries. Both dichotomous and continuous variables were extracted and pooled outcomes were expressed as risk ratio (RR) or standard mean difference (SMD). Results. Nine eligible studies (1089 subjects in total) were included in our analysis. The proportion of patients with undetectable HBV DNA at 24, 48, and 96 weeks were similar between the two comparable groups (62.5% versus 70.9%, P = 0.086; 78.1% versus 83.7%, P = 0.118; 86.4% versus 87.9%, P = 0.626, resp.). HBV DNA reduction, rates of ALT normalization, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) loss, and HBeAg seroconversion were also similar between the two groups. Conclusions. On the current data, TDF-based combination therapy seemed to be no better than those achieved by monotherapy. Further studies are needed to verify this comparison.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4737451
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47374512016-02-15 Efficacy of Tenofovir-Based Combination Therapy versus Tenofovir Monotherapy in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Presenting with Suboptimal Responses to Pretreatment: A Meta-Analysis Chen, Ling Wang, Xiwei Zhang, Qiongfang Gong, Jiaojiao Shen, Shasha Yin, Wenwei Hu, Huaidong Gastroenterol Res Pract Review Article Background/Aims. It remains unclear whether tenofovir disoproxil fumarate- (TDF-) based combination therapy produces better outcomes than TDF monotherapy in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of the two regimens by performing a meta-analysis. Methods. A comprehensive literature search was performed on the comparison of TDF-based combination therapy and monotherapy for CHB patients in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Libraries. Both dichotomous and continuous variables were extracted and pooled outcomes were expressed as risk ratio (RR) or standard mean difference (SMD). Results. Nine eligible studies (1089 subjects in total) were included in our analysis. The proportion of patients with undetectable HBV DNA at 24, 48, and 96 weeks were similar between the two comparable groups (62.5% versus 70.9%, P = 0.086; 78.1% versus 83.7%, P = 0.118; 86.4% versus 87.9%, P = 0.626, resp.). HBV DNA reduction, rates of ALT normalization, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) loss, and HBeAg seroconversion were also similar between the two groups. Conclusions. On the current data, TDF-based combination therapy seemed to be no better than those achieved by monotherapy. Further studies are needed to verify this comparison. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4737451/ /pubmed/26880896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7214020 Text en Copyright © 2016 Ling Chen et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Chen, Ling
Wang, Xiwei
Zhang, Qiongfang
Gong, Jiaojiao
Shen, Shasha
Yin, Wenwei
Hu, Huaidong
Efficacy of Tenofovir-Based Combination Therapy versus Tenofovir Monotherapy in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Presenting with Suboptimal Responses to Pretreatment: A Meta-Analysis
title Efficacy of Tenofovir-Based Combination Therapy versus Tenofovir Monotherapy in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Presenting with Suboptimal Responses to Pretreatment: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Efficacy of Tenofovir-Based Combination Therapy versus Tenofovir Monotherapy in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Presenting with Suboptimal Responses to Pretreatment: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy of Tenofovir-Based Combination Therapy versus Tenofovir Monotherapy in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Presenting with Suboptimal Responses to Pretreatment: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Tenofovir-Based Combination Therapy versus Tenofovir Monotherapy in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Presenting with Suboptimal Responses to Pretreatment: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Efficacy of Tenofovir-Based Combination Therapy versus Tenofovir Monotherapy in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Presenting with Suboptimal Responses to Pretreatment: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort efficacy of tenofovir-based combination therapy versus tenofovir monotherapy in chronic hepatitis b patients presenting with suboptimal responses to pretreatment: a meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4737451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26880896
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7214020
work_keys_str_mv AT chenling efficacyoftenofovirbasedcombinationtherapyversustenofovirmonotherapyinchronichepatitisbpatientspresentingwithsuboptimalresponsestopretreatmentametaanalysis
AT wangxiwei efficacyoftenofovirbasedcombinationtherapyversustenofovirmonotherapyinchronichepatitisbpatientspresentingwithsuboptimalresponsestopretreatmentametaanalysis
AT zhangqiongfang efficacyoftenofovirbasedcombinationtherapyversustenofovirmonotherapyinchronichepatitisbpatientspresentingwithsuboptimalresponsestopretreatmentametaanalysis
AT gongjiaojiao efficacyoftenofovirbasedcombinationtherapyversustenofovirmonotherapyinchronichepatitisbpatientspresentingwithsuboptimalresponsestopretreatmentametaanalysis
AT shenshasha efficacyoftenofovirbasedcombinationtherapyversustenofovirmonotherapyinchronichepatitisbpatientspresentingwithsuboptimalresponsestopretreatmentametaanalysis
AT yinwenwei efficacyoftenofovirbasedcombinationtherapyversustenofovirmonotherapyinchronichepatitisbpatientspresentingwithsuboptimalresponsestopretreatmentametaanalysis
AT huhuaidong efficacyoftenofovirbasedcombinationtherapyversustenofovirmonotherapyinchronichepatitisbpatientspresentingwithsuboptimalresponsestopretreatmentametaanalysis