Cargando…

Qualitative grading of aortic regurgitation: a pilot study comparing CMR 4D flow and echocardiography

Over the past 10 years there has been intense research in the development of volumetric visualization of intracardiac flow by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). This volumetric time resolved technique called CMR 4D flow imaging has several advantages over standard CMR. It offers anatomical, functiona...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chelu, Raluca G., van den Bosch, Annemien E., van Kranenburg, Matthijs, Hsiao, Albert, van den Hoven, Allard T., Ouhlous, Mohamed, Budde, Ricardo P. J., Beniest, Kirsten M., Swart, Laurens E., Coenen, Adriaan, Lubbers, Marisa M., Wielopolski, Piotr A., Vasanawala, Shreyas S., Roos-Hesselink, Jolien W., Nieman, Koen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4737795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26498478
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-015-0779-7
_version_ 1782413521563156480
author Chelu, Raluca G.
van den Bosch, Annemien E.
van Kranenburg, Matthijs
Hsiao, Albert
van den Hoven, Allard T.
Ouhlous, Mohamed
Budde, Ricardo P. J.
Beniest, Kirsten M.
Swart, Laurens E.
Coenen, Adriaan
Lubbers, Marisa M.
Wielopolski, Piotr A.
Vasanawala, Shreyas S.
Roos-Hesselink, Jolien W.
Nieman, Koen
author_facet Chelu, Raluca G.
van den Bosch, Annemien E.
van Kranenburg, Matthijs
Hsiao, Albert
van den Hoven, Allard T.
Ouhlous, Mohamed
Budde, Ricardo P. J.
Beniest, Kirsten M.
Swart, Laurens E.
Coenen, Adriaan
Lubbers, Marisa M.
Wielopolski, Piotr A.
Vasanawala, Shreyas S.
Roos-Hesselink, Jolien W.
Nieman, Koen
author_sort Chelu, Raluca G.
collection PubMed
description Over the past 10 years there has been intense research in the development of volumetric visualization of intracardiac flow by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). This volumetric time resolved technique called CMR 4D flow imaging has several advantages over standard CMR. It offers anatomical, functional and flow information in a single free-breathing, ten-minute acquisition. However, the data obtained is large and its processing requires dedicated software. We evaluated a cloud-based application package that combines volumetric data correction and visualization of CMR 4D flow data, and assessed its accuracy for the detection and grading of aortic valve regurgitation using transthoracic echocardiography as reference. Between June 2014 and January 2015, patients planned for clinical CMR were consecutively approached to undergo the supplementary CMR 4D flow acquisition. Fifty four patients (median age 39 years, 32 males) were included. Detection and grading of the aortic valve regurgitation using CMR 4D flow imaging were evaluated against transthoracic echocardiography. The agreement between 4D flow CMR and transthoracic echocardiography for grading of aortic valve regurgitation was good (κ = 0.73). To identify relevant, more than mild aortic valve regurgitation, CMR 4D flow imaging had a sensitivity of 100 % and specificity of 98 %. Aortic regurgitation can be well visualized, in a similar manner as transthoracic echocardiography, when using CMR 4D flow imaging. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10554-015-0779-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4737795
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47377952016-02-09 Qualitative grading of aortic regurgitation: a pilot study comparing CMR 4D flow and echocardiography Chelu, Raluca G. van den Bosch, Annemien E. van Kranenburg, Matthijs Hsiao, Albert van den Hoven, Allard T. Ouhlous, Mohamed Budde, Ricardo P. J. Beniest, Kirsten M. Swart, Laurens E. Coenen, Adriaan Lubbers, Marisa M. Wielopolski, Piotr A. Vasanawala, Shreyas S. Roos-Hesselink, Jolien W. Nieman, Koen Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Original Paper Over the past 10 years there has been intense research in the development of volumetric visualization of intracardiac flow by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). This volumetric time resolved technique called CMR 4D flow imaging has several advantages over standard CMR. It offers anatomical, functional and flow information in a single free-breathing, ten-minute acquisition. However, the data obtained is large and its processing requires dedicated software. We evaluated a cloud-based application package that combines volumetric data correction and visualization of CMR 4D flow data, and assessed its accuracy for the detection and grading of aortic valve regurgitation using transthoracic echocardiography as reference. Between June 2014 and January 2015, patients planned for clinical CMR were consecutively approached to undergo the supplementary CMR 4D flow acquisition. Fifty four patients (median age 39 years, 32 males) were included. Detection and grading of the aortic valve regurgitation using CMR 4D flow imaging were evaluated against transthoracic echocardiography. The agreement between 4D flow CMR and transthoracic echocardiography for grading of aortic valve regurgitation was good (κ = 0.73). To identify relevant, more than mild aortic valve regurgitation, CMR 4D flow imaging had a sensitivity of 100 % and specificity of 98 %. Aortic regurgitation can be well visualized, in a similar manner as transthoracic echocardiography, when using CMR 4D flow imaging. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10554-015-0779-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Netherlands 2015-10-24 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4737795/ /pubmed/26498478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-015-0779-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Chelu, Raluca G.
van den Bosch, Annemien E.
van Kranenburg, Matthijs
Hsiao, Albert
van den Hoven, Allard T.
Ouhlous, Mohamed
Budde, Ricardo P. J.
Beniest, Kirsten M.
Swart, Laurens E.
Coenen, Adriaan
Lubbers, Marisa M.
Wielopolski, Piotr A.
Vasanawala, Shreyas S.
Roos-Hesselink, Jolien W.
Nieman, Koen
Qualitative grading of aortic regurgitation: a pilot study comparing CMR 4D flow and echocardiography
title Qualitative grading of aortic regurgitation: a pilot study comparing CMR 4D flow and echocardiography
title_full Qualitative grading of aortic regurgitation: a pilot study comparing CMR 4D flow and echocardiography
title_fullStr Qualitative grading of aortic regurgitation: a pilot study comparing CMR 4D flow and echocardiography
title_full_unstemmed Qualitative grading of aortic regurgitation: a pilot study comparing CMR 4D flow and echocardiography
title_short Qualitative grading of aortic regurgitation: a pilot study comparing CMR 4D flow and echocardiography
title_sort qualitative grading of aortic regurgitation: a pilot study comparing cmr 4d flow and echocardiography
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4737795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26498478
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-015-0779-7
work_keys_str_mv AT cheluralucag qualitativegradingofaorticregurgitationapilotstudycomparingcmr4dflowandechocardiography
AT vandenboschannemiene qualitativegradingofaorticregurgitationapilotstudycomparingcmr4dflowandechocardiography
AT vankranenburgmatthijs qualitativegradingofaorticregurgitationapilotstudycomparingcmr4dflowandechocardiography
AT hsiaoalbert qualitativegradingofaorticregurgitationapilotstudycomparingcmr4dflowandechocardiography
AT vandenhovenallardt qualitativegradingofaorticregurgitationapilotstudycomparingcmr4dflowandechocardiography
AT ouhlousmohamed qualitativegradingofaorticregurgitationapilotstudycomparingcmr4dflowandechocardiography
AT buddericardopj qualitativegradingofaorticregurgitationapilotstudycomparingcmr4dflowandechocardiography
AT beniestkirstenm qualitativegradingofaorticregurgitationapilotstudycomparingcmr4dflowandechocardiography
AT swartlaurense qualitativegradingofaorticregurgitationapilotstudycomparingcmr4dflowandechocardiography
AT coenenadriaan qualitativegradingofaorticregurgitationapilotstudycomparingcmr4dflowandechocardiography
AT lubbersmarisam qualitativegradingofaorticregurgitationapilotstudycomparingcmr4dflowandechocardiography
AT wielopolskipiotra qualitativegradingofaorticregurgitationapilotstudycomparingcmr4dflowandechocardiography
AT vasanawalashreyass qualitativegradingofaorticregurgitationapilotstudycomparingcmr4dflowandechocardiography
AT rooshesselinkjolienw qualitativegradingofaorticregurgitationapilotstudycomparingcmr4dflowandechocardiography
AT niemankoen qualitativegradingofaorticregurgitationapilotstudycomparingcmr4dflowandechocardiography