Cargando…

Accuracy and Injection Force of the Gla-300 Injection Device Compared With Other Commercialized Disposable Insulin Pens

BACKGROUND: To deliver insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300), the widely used SoloSTAR(®) pen has been modified to allow for accurate and precise delivery of required insulin units in one-third of the volume compared with insulin glargine 100 U/mL, while improving usability. Here we compare the accura...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klonoff, David, Nayberg, Irina, Thonius, Marissa, See, Florian, Abdel-Tawab, Mona, Erbstein, Frank, Haak, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4738217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26311720
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1932296815601441
_version_ 1782413569892024320
author Klonoff, David
Nayberg, Irina
Thonius, Marissa
See, Florian
Abdel-Tawab, Mona
Erbstein, Frank
Haak, Thomas
author_facet Klonoff, David
Nayberg, Irina
Thonius, Marissa
See, Florian
Abdel-Tawab, Mona
Erbstein, Frank
Haak, Thomas
author_sort Klonoff, David
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To deliver insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300), the widely used SoloSTAR(®) pen has been modified to allow for accurate and precise delivery of required insulin units in one-third of the volume compared with insulin glargine 100 U/mL, while improving usability. Here we compare the accuracy and injection force of 3 disposable insulin pens: Gla-300 SoloSTAR(®), FlexPen(®), and KwikPen™. METHODS: For the accuracy assessment, 60 of each of the 3 tested devices were used for the delivery of 3 different doses (1 U, half-maximal dose, and maximal dose), which were measured gravimetrically. For the injection force assessment, 20 pens of each of the 3 types were tested twice at half-maximal and once at maximal dose, at an injection speed of 6 U/s. RESULTS: All tested pens met the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) requirements for dosing accuracy, with Gla-300 SoloSTAR showing the lowest between-dose variation (greatest reproducibility) at all dose levels. Mean injection force was significantly lower for Gla-300 SoloSTAR than for the other 2 pens at both half maximal and maximal doses (P < .0271). CONCLUSION: All tested pens were accurate according to ISO criteria, and the Gla-300 SoloSTAR pen displayed the greatest reproducibility and lowest injection force of any of the 3 tested devices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4738217
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47382172016-08-26 Accuracy and Injection Force of the Gla-300 Injection Device Compared With Other Commercialized Disposable Insulin Pens Klonoff, David Nayberg, Irina Thonius, Marissa See, Florian Abdel-Tawab, Mona Erbstein, Frank Haak, Thomas J Diabetes Sci Technol Original Articles BACKGROUND: To deliver insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300), the widely used SoloSTAR(®) pen has been modified to allow for accurate and precise delivery of required insulin units in one-third of the volume compared with insulin glargine 100 U/mL, while improving usability. Here we compare the accuracy and injection force of 3 disposable insulin pens: Gla-300 SoloSTAR(®), FlexPen(®), and KwikPen™. METHODS: For the accuracy assessment, 60 of each of the 3 tested devices were used for the delivery of 3 different doses (1 U, half-maximal dose, and maximal dose), which were measured gravimetrically. For the injection force assessment, 20 pens of each of the 3 types were tested twice at half-maximal and once at maximal dose, at an injection speed of 6 U/s. RESULTS: All tested pens met the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) requirements for dosing accuracy, with Gla-300 SoloSTAR showing the lowest between-dose variation (greatest reproducibility) at all dose levels. Mean injection force was significantly lower for Gla-300 SoloSTAR than for the other 2 pens at both half maximal and maximal doses (P < .0271). CONCLUSION: All tested pens were accurate according to ISO criteria, and the Gla-300 SoloSTAR pen displayed the greatest reproducibility and lowest injection force of any of the 3 tested devices. SAGE Publications 2015-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4738217/ /pubmed/26311720 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1932296815601441 Text en © 2015 Diabetes Technology Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Klonoff, David
Nayberg, Irina
Thonius, Marissa
See, Florian
Abdel-Tawab, Mona
Erbstein, Frank
Haak, Thomas
Accuracy and Injection Force of the Gla-300 Injection Device Compared With Other Commercialized Disposable Insulin Pens
title Accuracy and Injection Force of the Gla-300 Injection Device Compared With Other Commercialized Disposable Insulin Pens
title_full Accuracy and Injection Force of the Gla-300 Injection Device Compared With Other Commercialized Disposable Insulin Pens
title_fullStr Accuracy and Injection Force of the Gla-300 Injection Device Compared With Other Commercialized Disposable Insulin Pens
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy and Injection Force of the Gla-300 Injection Device Compared With Other Commercialized Disposable Insulin Pens
title_short Accuracy and Injection Force of the Gla-300 Injection Device Compared With Other Commercialized Disposable Insulin Pens
title_sort accuracy and injection force of the gla-300 injection device compared with other commercialized disposable insulin pens
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4738217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26311720
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1932296815601441
work_keys_str_mv AT klonoffdavid accuracyandinjectionforceofthegla300injectiondevicecomparedwithothercommercializeddisposableinsulinpens
AT naybergirina accuracyandinjectionforceofthegla300injectiondevicecomparedwithothercommercializeddisposableinsulinpens
AT thoniusmarissa accuracyandinjectionforceofthegla300injectiondevicecomparedwithothercommercializeddisposableinsulinpens
AT seeflorian accuracyandinjectionforceofthegla300injectiondevicecomparedwithothercommercializeddisposableinsulinpens
AT abdeltawabmona accuracyandinjectionforceofthegla300injectiondevicecomparedwithothercommercializeddisposableinsulinpens
AT erbsteinfrank accuracyandinjectionforceofthegla300injectiondevicecomparedwithothercommercializeddisposableinsulinpens
AT haakthomas accuracyandinjectionforceofthegla300injectiondevicecomparedwithothercommercializeddisposableinsulinpens