Cargando…

Does stroke location predict walk speed response to gait rehabilitation?

OBJECTIVES: Recovery of independent ambulation after stroke is a major goal. However, which rehabilitation regimen best benefits each individual is unknown and decisions are currently made on a subjective basis. Predictors of response to specific therapies would guide the type of therapy most approp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jones, P. Simon, Pomeroy, Valerie M., Wang, Jasmine, Schlaug, Gottfried, Tulasi Marrapu, S., Geva, Sharon, Rowe, Philip J., Chandler, Elizabeth, Kerr, Andrew, Baron, Jean‐Claude
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4738376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26621010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23059
_version_ 1782413600920436736
author Jones, P. Simon
Pomeroy, Valerie M.
Wang, Jasmine
Schlaug, Gottfried
Tulasi Marrapu, S.
Geva, Sharon
Rowe, Philip J.
Chandler, Elizabeth
Kerr, Andrew
Baron, Jean‐Claude
author_facet Jones, P. Simon
Pomeroy, Valerie M.
Wang, Jasmine
Schlaug, Gottfried
Tulasi Marrapu, S.
Geva, Sharon
Rowe, Philip J.
Chandler, Elizabeth
Kerr, Andrew
Baron, Jean‐Claude
author_sort Jones, P. Simon
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Recovery of independent ambulation after stroke is a major goal. However, which rehabilitation regimen best benefits each individual is unknown and decisions are currently made on a subjective basis. Predictors of response to specific therapies would guide the type of therapy most appropriate for each patient. Although lesion topography is a strong predictor of upper limb response, walking involves more distributed functions. Earlier studies that assessed the cortico‐spinal tract (CST) were negative, suggesting other structures may be important. Experimental Design: The relationship between lesion topography and response of walking speed to standard rehabilitation was assessed in 50 adult‐onset patients using both volumetric measurement of CST lesion load and voxel‐based lesion–symptom mapping (VLSM) to assess non‐CST structures. Two functional mobility scales, the functional ambulation category (FAC) and the modified rivermead mobility index (MRMI) were also administered. Performance measures were obtained both at entry into the study (3–42 days post‐stroke) and at the end of a 6‐week course of therapy. Baseline score, age, time since stroke onset and white matter hyperintensities score were included as nuisance covariates in regression models. Principal Observations: CST damage independently predicted response to therapy for FAC and MRMI, but not for walk speed. However, using VLSM the latter was predicted by damage to the putamen, insula, external capsule and neighbouring white matter. CONCLUSIONS: Walk speed response to rehabilitation was affected by damage involving the putamen and neighbouring structures but not the CST, while the latter had modest but significant impact on everyday functions of general mobility and gait. Hum Brain Mapp 37:689–703, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4738376
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47383762016-02-12 Does stroke location predict walk speed response to gait rehabilitation? Jones, P. Simon Pomeroy, Valerie M. Wang, Jasmine Schlaug, Gottfried Tulasi Marrapu, S. Geva, Sharon Rowe, Philip J. Chandler, Elizabeth Kerr, Andrew Baron, Jean‐Claude Hum Brain Mapp Research Articles OBJECTIVES: Recovery of independent ambulation after stroke is a major goal. However, which rehabilitation regimen best benefits each individual is unknown and decisions are currently made on a subjective basis. Predictors of response to specific therapies would guide the type of therapy most appropriate for each patient. Although lesion topography is a strong predictor of upper limb response, walking involves more distributed functions. Earlier studies that assessed the cortico‐spinal tract (CST) were negative, suggesting other structures may be important. Experimental Design: The relationship between lesion topography and response of walking speed to standard rehabilitation was assessed in 50 adult‐onset patients using both volumetric measurement of CST lesion load and voxel‐based lesion–symptom mapping (VLSM) to assess non‐CST structures. Two functional mobility scales, the functional ambulation category (FAC) and the modified rivermead mobility index (MRMI) were also administered. Performance measures were obtained both at entry into the study (3–42 days post‐stroke) and at the end of a 6‐week course of therapy. Baseline score, age, time since stroke onset and white matter hyperintensities score were included as nuisance covariates in regression models. Principal Observations: CST damage independently predicted response to therapy for FAC and MRMI, but not for walk speed. However, using VLSM the latter was predicted by damage to the putamen, insula, external capsule and neighbouring white matter. CONCLUSIONS: Walk speed response to rehabilitation was affected by damage involving the putamen and neighbouring structures but not the CST, while the latter had modest but significant impact on everyday functions of general mobility and gait. Hum Brain Mapp 37:689–703, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4738376/ /pubmed/26621010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23059 Text en © 2015 The Authors Human Brain Mapping Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Jones, P. Simon
Pomeroy, Valerie M.
Wang, Jasmine
Schlaug, Gottfried
Tulasi Marrapu, S.
Geva, Sharon
Rowe, Philip J.
Chandler, Elizabeth
Kerr, Andrew
Baron, Jean‐Claude
Does stroke location predict walk speed response to gait rehabilitation?
title Does stroke location predict walk speed response to gait rehabilitation?
title_full Does stroke location predict walk speed response to gait rehabilitation?
title_fullStr Does stroke location predict walk speed response to gait rehabilitation?
title_full_unstemmed Does stroke location predict walk speed response to gait rehabilitation?
title_short Does stroke location predict walk speed response to gait rehabilitation?
title_sort does stroke location predict walk speed response to gait rehabilitation?
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4738376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26621010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23059
work_keys_str_mv AT jonespsimon doesstrokelocationpredictwalkspeedresponsetogaitrehabilitation
AT pomeroyvaleriem doesstrokelocationpredictwalkspeedresponsetogaitrehabilitation
AT wangjasmine doesstrokelocationpredictwalkspeedresponsetogaitrehabilitation
AT schlauggottfried doesstrokelocationpredictwalkspeedresponsetogaitrehabilitation
AT tulasimarrapus doesstrokelocationpredictwalkspeedresponsetogaitrehabilitation
AT gevasharon doesstrokelocationpredictwalkspeedresponsetogaitrehabilitation
AT rowephilipj doesstrokelocationpredictwalkspeedresponsetogaitrehabilitation
AT chandlerelizabeth doesstrokelocationpredictwalkspeedresponsetogaitrehabilitation
AT kerrandrew doesstrokelocationpredictwalkspeedresponsetogaitrehabilitation
AT baronjeanclaude doesstrokelocationpredictwalkspeedresponsetogaitrehabilitation
AT doesstrokelocationpredictwalkspeedresponsetogaitrehabilitation