Cargando…
Meta‐analysis of genome‐wide association from genomic prediction models
Genome‐wide association (GWA) studies based on GBLUP models are a common practice in animal breeding. However, effect sizes of GWA tests are small, requiring larger sample sizes to enhance power of detection of rare variants. Because of difficulties in increasing sample size in animal populations, o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4738412/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26607299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/age.12378 |
_version_ | 1782413607001128960 |
---|---|
author | Bernal Rubio, Y. L. Gualdrón Duarte, J. L. Bates, R. O. Ernst, C. W. Nonneman, D. Rohrer, G. A. King, A. Shackelford, S. D. Wheeler, T. L. Cantet, R. J. C. Steibel, J. P. |
author_facet | Bernal Rubio, Y. L. Gualdrón Duarte, J. L. Bates, R. O. Ernst, C. W. Nonneman, D. Rohrer, G. A. King, A. Shackelford, S. D. Wheeler, T. L. Cantet, R. J. C. Steibel, J. P. |
author_sort | Bernal Rubio, Y. L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Genome‐wide association (GWA) studies based on GBLUP models are a common practice in animal breeding. However, effect sizes of GWA tests are small, requiring larger sample sizes to enhance power of detection of rare variants. Because of difficulties in increasing sample size in animal populations, one alternative is to implement a meta‐analysis (MA), combining information and results from independent GWA studies. Although this methodology has been used widely in human genetics, implementation in animal breeding has been limited. Thus, we present methods to implement a MA of GWA, describing the proper approach to compute weights derived from multiple genomic evaluations based on animal‐centric GBLUP models. Application to real datasets shows that MA increases power of detection of associations in comparison with population‐level GWA, allowing for population structure and heterogeneity of variance components across populations to be accounted for. Another advantage of MA is that it does not require access to genotype data that is required for a joint analysis. Scripts related to the implementation of this approach, which consider the strength of association as well as the sign, are distributed and thus account for heterogeneity in association phase between QTL and SNPs. Thus, MA of GWA is an attractive alternative to summarizing results from multiple genomic studies, avoiding restrictions with genotype data sharing, definition of fixed effects and different scales of measurement of evaluated traits. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4738412 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47384122016-02-12 Meta‐analysis of genome‐wide association from genomic prediction models Bernal Rubio, Y. L. Gualdrón Duarte, J. L. Bates, R. O. Ernst, C. W. Nonneman, D. Rohrer, G. A. King, A. Shackelford, S. D. Wheeler, T. L. Cantet, R. J. C. Steibel, J. P. Anim Genet Articles Genome‐wide association (GWA) studies based on GBLUP models are a common practice in animal breeding. However, effect sizes of GWA tests are small, requiring larger sample sizes to enhance power of detection of rare variants. Because of difficulties in increasing sample size in animal populations, one alternative is to implement a meta‐analysis (MA), combining information and results from independent GWA studies. Although this methodology has been used widely in human genetics, implementation in animal breeding has been limited. Thus, we present methods to implement a MA of GWA, describing the proper approach to compute weights derived from multiple genomic evaluations based on animal‐centric GBLUP models. Application to real datasets shows that MA increases power of detection of associations in comparison with population‐level GWA, allowing for population structure and heterogeneity of variance components across populations to be accounted for. Another advantage of MA is that it does not require access to genotype data that is required for a joint analysis. Scripts related to the implementation of this approach, which consider the strength of association as well as the sign, are distributed and thus account for heterogeneity in association phase between QTL and SNPs. Thus, MA of GWA is an attractive alternative to summarizing results from multiple genomic studies, avoiding restrictions with genotype data sharing, definition of fixed effects and different scales of measurement of evaluated traits. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-11-26 2016-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4738412/ /pubmed/26607299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/age.12378 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Animal Genetics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Stichting International Foundation for Animal Genetics. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Articles Bernal Rubio, Y. L. Gualdrón Duarte, J. L. Bates, R. O. Ernst, C. W. Nonneman, D. Rohrer, G. A. King, A. Shackelford, S. D. Wheeler, T. L. Cantet, R. J. C. Steibel, J. P. Meta‐analysis of genome‐wide association from genomic prediction models |
title | Meta‐analysis of genome‐wide association from genomic prediction models |
title_full | Meta‐analysis of genome‐wide association from genomic prediction models |
title_fullStr | Meta‐analysis of genome‐wide association from genomic prediction models |
title_full_unstemmed | Meta‐analysis of genome‐wide association from genomic prediction models |
title_short | Meta‐analysis of genome‐wide association from genomic prediction models |
title_sort | meta‐analysis of genome‐wide association from genomic prediction models |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4738412/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26607299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/age.12378 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bernalrubioyl metaanalysisofgenomewideassociationfromgenomicpredictionmodels AT gualdronduartejl metaanalysisofgenomewideassociationfromgenomicpredictionmodels AT batesro metaanalysisofgenomewideassociationfromgenomicpredictionmodels AT ernstcw metaanalysisofgenomewideassociationfromgenomicpredictionmodels AT nonnemand metaanalysisofgenomewideassociationfromgenomicpredictionmodels AT rohrerga metaanalysisofgenomewideassociationfromgenomicpredictionmodels AT kinga metaanalysisofgenomewideassociationfromgenomicpredictionmodels AT shackelfordsd metaanalysisofgenomewideassociationfromgenomicpredictionmodels AT wheelertl metaanalysisofgenomewideassociationfromgenomicpredictionmodels AT cantetrjc metaanalysisofgenomewideassociationfromgenomicpredictionmodels AT steibeljp metaanalysisofgenomewideassociationfromgenomicpredictionmodels |