Cargando…

Is superior tibiofibular joint resection necessary in extraarticular knee resection for sarcomas? A systematic review

BACKGROUND: Sarcomas infiltrating the knee joint require extraarticular resection to achieve wide margins. Opinions differ as to whether the superior tibiofibular joint (STFJ) is part of the knee joint and should be removed in the course of extraarticular resection. Thus, we investigated the frequen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gilg, Magdalena M., Wibmer, Christine, Andreou, Dimosthenis, Sadoghi, Patrick, Gosheger, Georg, Leithner, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4738782/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26842073
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-016-0783-y
_version_ 1782413659248525312
author Gilg, Magdalena M.
Wibmer, Christine
Andreou, Dimosthenis
Sadoghi, Patrick
Gosheger, Georg
Leithner, Andreas
author_facet Gilg, Magdalena M.
Wibmer, Christine
Andreou, Dimosthenis
Sadoghi, Patrick
Gosheger, Georg
Leithner, Andreas
author_sort Gilg, Magdalena M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sarcomas infiltrating the knee joint require extraarticular resection to achieve wide margins. Opinions differ as to whether the superior tibiofibular joint (STFJ) is part of the knee joint and should be removed in the course of extraarticular resection. Thus, we investigated the frequency of communication between the tibiofemoral joint (TFJ) and the STFJ, and the reported local recurrence rates (LRR) following extraarticular knee resection. METHODS: A systematic literature review on STFJ and TFJ communication and local recurrence rates following extraarticular knee resections was undertaken. RESULTS: Cadaver studies detected communication between the TFJ and STFJ in 10–64 % of the cases. Direct arthrography with physical loading verified a 100 % communication rate. Regarding the extent of extraarticular knee resection, two institutions where the STFJ was resected had a LRR of 4–8 %, while studies from another three where the STFJ was not routinely resected reported a LRR of 0–21 %. CONCLUSIONS: Since the literature reports about a 100 % communication rate between the TFJ and the STFJ, resection of the STFJ in patients with sarcomas involving the knee joint would seem to be indicated, although it is not clear whether resection of the STFJ reduces local recurrence rates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4738782
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47387822016-02-04 Is superior tibiofibular joint resection necessary in extraarticular knee resection for sarcomas? A systematic review Gilg, Magdalena M. Wibmer, Christine Andreou, Dimosthenis Sadoghi, Patrick Gosheger, Georg Leithner, Andreas World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Sarcomas infiltrating the knee joint require extraarticular resection to achieve wide margins. Opinions differ as to whether the superior tibiofibular joint (STFJ) is part of the knee joint and should be removed in the course of extraarticular resection. Thus, we investigated the frequency of communication between the tibiofemoral joint (TFJ) and the STFJ, and the reported local recurrence rates (LRR) following extraarticular knee resection. METHODS: A systematic literature review on STFJ and TFJ communication and local recurrence rates following extraarticular knee resections was undertaken. RESULTS: Cadaver studies detected communication between the TFJ and STFJ in 10–64 % of the cases. Direct arthrography with physical loading verified a 100 % communication rate. Regarding the extent of extraarticular knee resection, two institutions where the STFJ was resected had a LRR of 4–8 %, while studies from another three where the STFJ was not routinely resected reported a LRR of 0–21 %. CONCLUSIONS: Since the literature reports about a 100 % communication rate between the TFJ and the STFJ, resection of the STFJ in patients with sarcomas involving the knee joint would seem to be indicated, although it is not clear whether resection of the STFJ reduces local recurrence rates. BioMed Central 2016-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4738782/ /pubmed/26842073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-016-0783-y Text en © Gilg et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Gilg, Magdalena M.
Wibmer, Christine
Andreou, Dimosthenis
Sadoghi, Patrick
Gosheger, Georg
Leithner, Andreas
Is superior tibiofibular joint resection necessary in extraarticular knee resection for sarcomas? A systematic review
title Is superior tibiofibular joint resection necessary in extraarticular knee resection for sarcomas? A systematic review
title_full Is superior tibiofibular joint resection necessary in extraarticular knee resection for sarcomas? A systematic review
title_fullStr Is superior tibiofibular joint resection necessary in extraarticular knee resection for sarcomas? A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Is superior tibiofibular joint resection necessary in extraarticular knee resection for sarcomas? A systematic review
title_short Is superior tibiofibular joint resection necessary in extraarticular knee resection for sarcomas? A systematic review
title_sort is superior tibiofibular joint resection necessary in extraarticular knee resection for sarcomas? a systematic review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4738782/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26842073
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-016-0783-y
work_keys_str_mv AT gilgmagdalenam issuperiortibiofibularjointresectionnecessaryinextraarticularkneeresectionforsarcomasasystematicreview
AT wibmerchristine issuperiortibiofibularjointresectionnecessaryinextraarticularkneeresectionforsarcomasasystematicreview
AT andreoudimosthenis issuperiortibiofibularjointresectionnecessaryinextraarticularkneeresectionforsarcomasasystematicreview
AT sadoghipatrick issuperiortibiofibularjointresectionnecessaryinextraarticularkneeresectionforsarcomasasystematicreview
AT goshegergeorg issuperiortibiofibularjointresectionnecessaryinextraarticularkneeresectionforsarcomasasystematicreview
AT leithnerandreas issuperiortibiofibularjointresectionnecessaryinextraarticularkneeresectionforsarcomasasystematicreview