Cargando…
Is superior tibiofibular joint resection necessary in extraarticular knee resection for sarcomas? A systematic review
BACKGROUND: Sarcomas infiltrating the knee joint require extraarticular resection to achieve wide margins. Opinions differ as to whether the superior tibiofibular joint (STFJ) is part of the knee joint and should be removed in the course of extraarticular resection. Thus, we investigated the frequen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4738782/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26842073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-016-0783-y |
_version_ | 1782413659248525312 |
---|---|
author | Gilg, Magdalena M. Wibmer, Christine Andreou, Dimosthenis Sadoghi, Patrick Gosheger, Georg Leithner, Andreas |
author_facet | Gilg, Magdalena M. Wibmer, Christine Andreou, Dimosthenis Sadoghi, Patrick Gosheger, Georg Leithner, Andreas |
author_sort | Gilg, Magdalena M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Sarcomas infiltrating the knee joint require extraarticular resection to achieve wide margins. Opinions differ as to whether the superior tibiofibular joint (STFJ) is part of the knee joint and should be removed in the course of extraarticular resection. Thus, we investigated the frequency of communication between the tibiofemoral joint (TFJ) and the STFJ, and the reported local recurrence rates (LRR) following extraarticular knee resection. METHODS: A systematic literature review on STFJ and TFJ communication and local recurrence rates following extraarticular knee resections was undertaken. RESULTS: Cadaver studies detected communication between the TFJ and STFJ in 10–64 % of the cases. Direct arthrography with physical loading verified a 100 % communication rate. Regarding the extent of extraarticular knee resection, two institutions where the STFJ was resected had a LRR of 4–8 %, while studies from another three where the STFJ was not routinely resected reported a LRR of 0–21 %. CONCLUSIONS: Since the literature reports about a 100 % communication rate between the TFJ and the STFJ, resection of the STFJ in patients with sarcomas involving the knee joint would seem to be indicated, although it is not clear whether resection of the STFJ reduces local recurrence rates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4738782 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47387822016-02-04 Is superior tibiofibular joint resection necessary in extraarticular knee resection for sarcomas? A systematic review Gilg, Magdalena M. Wibmer, Christine Andreou, Dimosthenis Sadoghi, Patrick Gosheger, Georg Leithner, Andreas World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Sarcomas infiltrating the knee joint require extraarticular resection to achieve wide margins. Opinions differ as to whether the superior tibiofibular joint (STFJ) is part of the knee joint and should be removed in the course of extraarticular resection. Thus, we investigated the frequency of communication between the tibiofemoral joint (TFJ) and the STFJ, and the reported local recurrence rates (LRR) following extraarticular knee resection. METHODS: A systematic literature review on STFJ and TFJ communication and local recurrence rates following extraarticular knee resections was undertaken. RESULTS: Cadaver studies detected communication between the TFJ and STFJ in 10–64 % of the cases. Direct arthrography with physical loading verified a 100 % communication rate. Regarding the extent of extraarticular knee resection, two institutions where the STFJ was resected had a LRR of 4–8 %, while studies from another three where the STFJ was not routinely resected reported a LRR of 0–21 %. CONCLUSIONS: Since the literature reports about a 100 % communication rate between the TFJ and the STFJ, resection of the STFJ in patients with sarcomas involving the knee joint would seem to be indicated, although it is not clear whether resection of the STFJ reduces local recurrence rates. BioMed Central 2016-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4738782/ /pubmed/26842073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-016-0783-y Text en © Gilg et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Gilg, Magdalena M. Wibmer, Christine Andreou, Dimosthenis Sadoghi, Patrick Gosheger, Georg Leithner, Andreas Is superior tibiofibular joint resection necessary in extraarticular knee resection for sarcomas? A systematic review |
title | Is superior tibiofibular joint resection necessary in extraarticular knee resection for sarcomas? A systematic review |
title_full | Is superior tibiofibular joint resection necessary in extraarticular knee resection for sarcomas? A systematic review |
title_fullStr | Is superior tibiofibular joint resection necessary in extraarticular knee resection for sarcomas? A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Is superior tibiofibular joint resection necessary in extraarticular knee resection for sarcomas? A systematic review |
title_short | Is superior tibiofibular joint resection necessary in extraarticular knee resection for sarcomas? A systematic review |
title_sort | is superior tibiofibular joint resection necessary in extraarticular knee resection for sarcomas? a systematic review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4738782/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26842073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-016-0783-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gilgmagdalenam issuperiortibiofibularjointresectionnecessaryinextraarticularkneeresectionforsarcomasasystematicreview AT wibmerchristine issuperiortibiofibularjointresectionnecessaryinextraarticularkneeresectionforsarcomasasystematicreview AT andreoudimosthenis issuperiortibiofibularjointresectionnecessaryinextraarticularkneeresectionforsarcomasasystematicreview AT sadoghipatrick issuperiortibiofibularjointresectionnecessaryinextraarticularkneeresectionforsarcomasasystematicreview AT goshegergeorg issuperiortibiofibularjointresectionnecessaryinextraarticularkneeresectionforsarcomasasystematicreview AT leithnerandreas issuperiortibiofibularjointresectionnecessaryinextraarticularkneeresectionforsarcomasasystematicreview |