Cargando…

Energy Drinks: Ergolytic or Ergogenic?

Despite the growing popularity of energy drinks, many do not realize the negative effects on the cardiovascular system. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of energy drink ingestion on estimated VO(2)max, heart rate (HR), systolic and diastolic BP (SBP and DBP, respectively), rate p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: SILLIVENT, JOE, BLEVINS, JENNIFER, PEAK, KAYLA
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Berkeley Electronic Press 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4738925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27182384
_version_ 1782413679538470912
author SILLIVENT, JOE
BLEVINS, JENNIFER
PEAK, KAYLA
author_facet SILLIVENT, JOE
BLEVINS, JENNIFER
PEAK, KAYLA
author_sort SILLIVENT, JOE
collection PubMed
description Despite the growing popularity of energy drinks, many do not realize the negative effects on the cardiovascular system. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of energy drink ingestion on estimated VO(2)max, heart rate (HR), systolic and diastolic BP (SBP and DBP, respectively), rate pressure product (RPP), and RPE at rest and during exercise. Seven healthy adults (age: 24.3 ± 3.5 yrs; body mass: = 66.0 ± 2.2 kg) participated in this randomized double blind, crossover study. Subjects ingested a placebo (PL) or Redline (RL) energy drink (240ml; 250 mg caffeine) 40 minutes before maximal graded exercise test (GXT). Estimated maximal oxygen consumption (VO(2)max) was lower in the RL trial (37.9±5.7 ml·kg(−1)·min(−1)) compared to the PL trial (39.7±6.5 ml·kg(−1)·min(−1); P= 0.02). Although no significant differences were noted for the number of ectopic beats (ETB) between the trials, a five to one ratio for the RL and PL existed (RL = 106 total ectopic beats; PL = 21 total ectopic beats). Sub-maximal exercise heart demand (RPP: systolic BP × HR) at the same workload was considerably higher in the RL trial (224.9 ± 39.9 mmHg·bts·min(−1); P=0.04) compared to PL (195.8 ± 22.9 mmHg·bts·min(−1)). Recovery DBP was significantly higher at one min. in the RL trial (51.6 ± 25.1 mmHg) compared to PL (25.4 ± 33.8 mmHg; P=0.05). Based on the results of this study, it was determined that energy drinks lowered estimated VO(2)max while elevating RPP and recovery DBP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4738925
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Berkeley Electronic Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47389252016-05-12 Energy Drinks: Ergolytic or Ergogenic? SILLIVENT, JOE BLEVINS, JENNIFER PEAK, KAYLA Int J Exerc Sci Original Research Despite the growing popularity of energy drinks, many do not realize the negative effects on the cardiovascular system. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of energy drink ingestion on estimated VO(2)max, heart rate (HR), systolic and diastolic BP (SBP and DBP, respectively), rate pressure product (RPP), and RPE at rest and during exercise. Seven healthy adults (age: 24.3 ± 3.5 yrs; body mass: = 66.0 ± 2.2 kg) participated in this randomized double blind, crossover study. Subjects ingested a placebo (PL) or Redline (RL) energy drink (240ml; 250 mg caffeine) 40 minutes before maximal graded exercise test (GXT). Estimated maximal oxygen consumption (VO(2)max) was lower in the RL trial (37.9±5.7 ml·kg(−1)·min(−1)) compared to the PL trial (39.7±6.5 ml·kg(−1)·min(−1); P= 0.02). Although no significant differences were noted for the number of ectopic beats (ETB) between the trials, a five to one ratio for the RL and PL existed (RL = 106 total ectopic beats; PL = 21 total ectopic beats). Sub-maximal exercise heart demand (RPP: systolic BP × HR) at the same workload was considerably higher in the RL trial (224.9 ± 39.9 mmHg·bts·min(−1); P=0.04) compared to PL (195.8 ± 22.9 mmHg·bts·min(−1)). Recovery DBP was significantly higher at one min. in the RL trial (51.6 ± 25.1 mmHg) compared to PL (25.4 ± 33.8 mmHg; P=0.05). Based on the results of this study, it was determined that energy drinks lowered estimated VO(2)max while elevating RPP and recovery DBP. Berkeley Electronic Press 2012-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4738925/ /pubmed/27182384 Text en
spellingShingle Original Research
SILLIVENT, JOE
BLEVINS, JENNIFER
PEAK, KAYLA
Energy Drinks: Ergolytic or Ergogenic?
title Energy Drinks: Ergolytic or Ergogenic?
title_full Energy Drinks: Ergolytic or Ergogenic?
title_fullStr Energy Drinks: Ergolytic or Ergogenic?
title_full_unstemmed Energy Drinks: Ergolytic or Ergogenic?
title_short Energy Drinks: Ergolytic or Ergogenic?
title_sort energy drinks: ergolytic or ergogenic?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4738925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27182384
work_keys_str_mv AT silliventjoe energydrinksergolyticorergogenic
AT blevinsjennifer energydrinksergolyticorergogenic
AT peakkayla energydrinksergolyticorergogenic