Cargando…
NEW ALTERNATIVE FOR WOUND PROTECTION IN LAPAROSCOPIC COLECTOMY
BACKGROUND: Large number of surgical services use laparoscopy to approach the colon. One of the concerns on the resection using this way is the high rate of cancer relapse at in- and outlet site of the surgical instruments. AIM: To describe a protective device for surgical isolation in laparoscopic...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4739240/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25861073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-67202015000100016 |
_version_ | 1782413713607753728 |
---|---|
author | da SILVA, José Jorge SILVA, Rafael Melo COSTA, Kárin Kneipp |
author_facet | da SILVA, José Jorge SILVA, Rafael Melo COSTA, Kárin Kneipp |
author_sort | da SILVA, José Jorge |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Large number of surgical services use laparoscopy to approach the colon. One of the concerns on the resection using this way is the high rate of cancer relapse at in- and outlet site of the surgical instruments. AIM: To describe a protective device for surgical isolation in laparoscopic colectomy. METHODS: The device is made of sterile polyethylene plastic cover used to protect the fiber optic cable in laparoscopic surgery and one 20 Fr. urethral catheter working as a conduit. RESULTS: The device was used in six laparoscopic colectomies, three for adenocarcinoma of the colon and three for intestinal endometriosis. It was effective to avoid contact of the specimen with the abdominal wall, in order to reduce the risk of implantation of cancer or endometriotic cells and surgical site infection. The device was made intraoperative at all surgeries and allowed good visualization in laparoscopy and maintenance of the pneumoperitoneum. It cost R$ 22,00 (approximately US$ 10), R$14.50 related to the plastic cover and R$7.50, the urethral tube. The production time of the device and its installation in the abdominal cavity was measured in each procedure and was, on average, respectively, of 66 s and 25 s. CONCLUSIONS: The device proved to be feasible, not requiring any special training and can be performed by the surgical team itself, even at institutions with limited resources. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4739240 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47392402016-02-24 NEW ALTERNATIVE FOR WOUND PROTECTION IN LAPAROSCOPIC COLECTOMY da SILVA, José Jorge SILVA, Rafael Melo COSTA, Kárin Kneipp Arq Bras Cir Dig Original Article BACKGROUND: Large number of surgical services use laparoscopy to approach the colon. One of the concerns on the resection using this way is the high rate of cancer relapse at in- and outlet site of the surgical instruments. AIM: To describe a protective device for surgical isolation in laparoscopic colectomy. METHODS: The device is made of sterile polyethylene plastic cover used to protect the fiber optic cable in laparoscopic surgery and one 20 Fr. urethral catheter working as a conduit. RESULTS: The device was used in six laparoscopic colectomies, three for adenocarcinoma of the colon and three for intestinal endometriosis. It was effective to avoid contact of the specimen with the abdominal wall, in order to reduce the risk of implantation of cancer or endometriotic cells and surgical site infection. The device was made intraoperative at all surgeries and allowed good visualization in laparoscopy and maintenance of the pneumoperitoneum. It cost R$ 22,00 (approximately US$ 10), R$14.50 related to the plastic cover and R$7.50, the urethral tube. The production time of the device and its installation in the abdominal cavity was measured in each procedure and was, on average, respectively, of 66 s and 25 s. CONCLUSIONS: The device proved to be feasible, not requiring any special training and can be performed by the surgical team itself, even at institutions with limited resources. Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4739240/ /pubmed/25861073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-67202015000100016 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article da SILVA, José Jorge SILVA, Rafael Melo COSTA, Kárin Kneipp NEW ALTERNATIVE FOR WOUND PROTECTION IN LAPAROSCOPIC COLECTOMY |
title | NEW ALTERNATIVE FOR WOUND PROTECTION IN LAPAROSCOPIC
COLECTOMY |
title_full | NEW ALTERNATIVE FOR WOUND PROTECTION IN LAPAROSCOPIC
COLECTOMY |
title_fullStr | NEW ALTERNATIVE FOR WOUND PROTECTION IN LAPAROSCOPIC
COLECTOMY |
title_full_unstemmed | NEW ALTERNATIVE FOR WOUND PROTECTION IN LAPAROSCOPIC
COLECTOMY |
title_short | NEW ALTERNATIVE FOR WOUND PROTECTION IN LAPAROSCOPIC
COLECTOMY |
title_sort | new alternative for wound protection in laparoscopic
colectomy |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4739240/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25861073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-67202015000100016 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dasilvajosejorge newalternativeforwoundprotectioninlaparoscopiccolectomy AT silvarafaelmelo newalternativeforwoundprotectioninlaparoscopiccolectomy AT costakarinkneipp newalternativeforwoundprotectioninlaparoscopiccolectomy |