Cargando…

NEW ALTERNATIVE FOR WOUND PROTECTION IN LAPAROSCOPIC COLECTOMY

BACKGROUND: Large number of surgical services use laparoscopy to approach the colon. One of the concerns on the resection using this way is the high rate of cancer relapse at in- and outlet site of the surgical instruments. AIM: To describe a protective device for surgical isolation in laparoscopic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: da SILVA, José Jorge, SILVA, Rafael Melo, COSTA, Kárin Kneipp
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4739240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25861073
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-67202015000100016
_version_ 1782413713607753728
author da SILVA, José Jorge
SILVA, Rafael Melo
COSTA, Kárin Kneipp
author_facet da SILVA, José Jorge
SILVA, Rafael Melo
COSTA, Kárin Kneipp
author_sort da SILVA, José Jorge
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Large number of surgical services use laparoscopy to approach the colon. One of the concerns on the resection using this way is the high rate of cancer relapse at in- and outlet site of the surgical instruments. AIM: To describe a protective device for surgical isolation in laparoscopic colectomy. METHODS: The device is made of sterile polyethylene plastic cover used to protect the fiber optic cable in laparoscopic surgery and one 20 Fr. urethral catheter working as a conduit. RESULTS: The device was used in six laparoscopic colectomies, three for adenocarcinoma of the colon and three for intestinal endometriosis. It was effective to avoid contact of the specimen with the abdominal wall, in order to reduce the risk of implantation of cancer or endometriotic cells and surgical site infection. The device was made intraoperative at all surgeries and allowed good visualization in laparoscopy and maintenance of the pneumoperitoneum. It cost R$ 22,00 (approximately US$ 10), R$14.50 related to the plastic cover and R$7.50, the urethral tube. The production time of the device and its installation in the abdominal cavity was measured in each procedure and was, on average, respectively, of 66 s and 25 s. CONCLUSIONS: The device proved to be feasible, not requiring any special training and can be performed by the surgical team itself, even at institutions with limited resources.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4739240
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47392402016-02-24 NEW ALTERNATIVE FOR WOUND PROTECTION IN LAPAROSCOPIC COLECTOMY da SILVA, José Jorge SILVA, Rafael Melo COSTA, Kárin Kneipp Arq Bras Cir Dig Original Article BACKGROUND: Large number of surgical services use laparoscopy to approach the colon. One of the concerns on the resection using this way is the high rate of cancer relapse at in- and outlet site of the surgical instruments. AIM: To describe a protective device for surgical isolation in laparoscopic colectomy. METHODS: The device is made of sterile polyethylene plastic cover used to protect the fiber optic cable in laparoscopic surgery and one 20 Fr. urethral catheter working as a conduit. RESULTS: The device was used in six laparoscopic colectomies, three for adenocarcinoma of the colon and three for intestinal endometriosis. It was effective to avoid contact of the specimen with the abdominal wall, in order to reduce the risk of implantation of cancer or endometriotic cells and surgical site infection. The device was made intraoperative at all surgeries and allowed good visualization in laparoscopy and maintenance of the pneumoperitoneum. It cost R$ 22,00 (approximately US$ 10), R$14.50 related to the plastic cover and R$7.50, the urethral tube. The production time of the device and its installation in the abdominal cavity was measured in each procedure and was, on average, respectively, of 66 s and 25 s. CONCLUSIONS: The device proved to be feasible, not requiring any special training and can be performed by the surgical team itself, even at institutions with limited resources. Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4739240/ /pubmed/25861073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-67202015000100016 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
da SILVA, José Jorge
SILVA, Rafael Melo
COSTA, Kárin Kneipp
NEW ALTERNATIVE FOR WOUND PROTECTION IN LAPAROSCOPIC COLECTOMY
title NEW ALTERNATIVE FOR WOUND PROTECTION IN LAPAROSCOPIC COLECTOMY
title_full NEW ALTERNATIVE FOR WOUND PROTECTION IN LAPAROSCOPIC COLECTOMY
title_fullStr NEW ALTERNATIVE FOR WOUND PROTECTION IN LAPAROSCOPIC COLECTOMY
title_full_unstemmed NEW ALTERNATIVE FOR WOUND PROTECTION IN LAPAROSCOPIC COLECTOMY
title_short NEW ALTERNATIVE FOR WOUND PROTECTION IN LAPAROSCOPIC COLECTOMY
title_sort new alternative for wound protection in laparoscopic colectomy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4739240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25861073
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-67202015000100016
work_keys_str_mv AT dasilvajosejorge newalternativeforwoundprotectioninlaparoscopiccolectomy
AT silvarafaelmelo newalternativeforwoundprotectioninlaparoscopiccolectomy
AT costakarinkneipp newalternativeforwoundprotectioninlaparoscopiccolectomy