Cargando…

COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC TOTAL GASTRECTOMY AND LAPAROTOMIC TOTAL GASTRECTOMY FOR GASTRIC CANCER

BACKGROUND: The use of laparoscopy for the treatment of gastric cancer suffered some resistance among surgeons around the world, gaining strength in the past decade. However, its oncological safety and technical feasibility remain controversial. AIM: To describe the results from the clinical and ana...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: RAMAGEM, Carlos Alexandre Garção, LINHARES, Marcelo, LACERDA, Croider Franco, BERTULUCCI, Paulo Anderson, WONRATH, Durval, de OLIVEIRA, Antônio Talvane Torres
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4739248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25861074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-67202015000100017
_version_ 1782413715410255872
author RAMAGEM, Carlos Alexandre Garção
LINHARES, Marcelo
LACERDA, Croider Franco
BERTULUCCI, Paulo Anderson
WONRATH, Durval
de OLIVEIRA, Antônio Talvane Torres
author_facet RAMAGEM, Carlos Alexandre Garção
LINHARES, Marcelo
LACERDA, Croider Franco
BERTULUCCI, Paulo Anderson
WONRATH, Durval
de OLIVEIRA, Antônio Talvane Torres
author_sort RAMAGEM, Carlos Alexandre Garção
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of laparoscopy for the treatment of gastric cancer suffered some resistance among surgeons around the world, gaining strength in the past decade. However, its oncological safety and technical feasibility remain controversial. AIM: To describe the results from the clinical and anatomopathological point of view in the comparative evaluation between the surgical videolaparoscopic and laparotomic treatments of total gastrectomy with linphadenectomy at D2, resection R0. METHOD: Retrospective analyses and comparison data from patients submitted to total gastrectomy with D2 linphadenectomy at a sole institution. The data of 111 patients showed that 64 (57,7%) have been submitted to laparotomic gastrectomy and 47 (42,3%) to gastrectomy entirely performed through videolaparoscopy. All variables related to the surgery, post-operative follow-up and anatomopathologic findings have been evaluated. RESULTS: Among the studied variables, videolaparoscopy has shown a shorter surgical time and a more premature period for the introduction of oral and enteral nourishment than the open surgery. As to the amount of dissected limph nodes, there has been a significant difference towards laparotomy with p=0,014, but the average dissected limph nodes in both groups exceed 25 nodes as recommended by the JAGC. Was not found a significant difference between the studied groups as to age, ASA, type of surgery, need for blood transfusion, stage of the disease, Bormann classification, degree of differentiation, damage of the margins, further complications and death. CONCLUSIONS: The total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy performed by laparoscopy presented the same benefits known of laparotomy and with the advantages already established of minimally invasive surgery. It was done with less surgical time, less time for re-introduction of the oral and enteral diets and lower hospitalization time compared to laparotomy, without increasing postoperative complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4739248
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47392482016-02-24 COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC TOTAL GASTRECTOMY AND LAPAROTOMIC TOTAL GASTRECTOMY FOR GASTRIC CANCER RAMAGEM, Carlos Alexandre Garção LINHARES, Marcelo LACERDA, Croider Franco BERTULUCCI, Paulo Anderson WONRATH, Durval de OLIVEIRA, Antônio Talvane Torres Arq Bras Cir Dig Original Article BACKGROUND: The use of laparoscopy for the treatment of gastric cancer suffered some resistance among surgeons around the world, gaining strength in the past decade. However, its oncological safety and technical feasibility remain controversial. AIM: To describe the results from the clinical and anatomopathological point of view in the comparative evaluation between the surgical videolaparoscopic and laparotomic treatments of total gastrectomy with linphadenectomy at D2, resection R0. METHOD: Retrospective analyses and comparison data from patients submitted to total gastrectomy with D2 linphadenectomy at a sole institution. The data of 111 patients showed that 64 (57,7%) have been submitted to laparotomic gastrectomy and 47 (42,3%) to gastrectomy entirely performed through videolaparoscopy. All variables related to the surgery, post-operative follow-up and anatomopathologic findings have been evaluated. RESULTS: Among the studied variables, videolaparoscopy has shown a shorter surgical time and a more premature period for the introduction of oral and enteral nourishment than the open surgery. As to the amount of dissected limph nodes, there has been a significant difference towards laparotomy with p=0,014, but the average dissected limph nodes in both groups exceed 25 nodes as recommended by the JAGC. Was not found a significant difference between the studied groups as to age, ASA, type of surgery, need for blood transfusion, stage of the disease, Bormann classification, degree of differentiation, damage of the margins, further complications and death. CONCLUSIONS: The total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy performed by laparoscopy presented the same benefits known of laparotomy and with the advantages already established of minimally invasive surgery. It was done with less surgical time, less time for re-introduction of the oral and enteral diets and lower hospitalization time compared to laparotomy, without increasing postoperative complications. Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4739248/ /pubmed/25861074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-67202015000100017 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
RAMAGEM, Carlos Alexandre Garção
LINHARES, Marcelo
LACERDA, Croider Franco
BERTULUCCI, Paulo Anderson
WONRATH, Durval
de OLIVEIRA, Antônio Talvane Torres
COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC TOTAL GASTRECTOMY AND LAPAROTOMIC TOTAL GASTRECTOMY FOR GASTRIC CANCER
title COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC TOTAL GASTRECTOMY AND LAPAROTOMIC TOTAL GASTRECTOMY FOR GASTRIC CANCER
title_full COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC TOTAL GASTRECTOMY AND LAPAROTOMIC TOTAL GASTRECTOMY FOR GASTRIC CANCER
title_fullStr COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC TOTAL GASTRECTOMY AND LAPAROTOMIC TOTAL GASTRECTOMY FOR GASTRIC CANCER
title_full_unstemmed COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC TOTAL GASTRECTOMY AND LAPAROTOMIC TOTAL GASTRECTOMY FOR GASTRIC CANCER
title_short COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC TOTAL GASTRECTOMY AND LAPAROTOMIC TOTAL GASTRECTOMY FOR GASTRIC CANCER
title_sort comparison of laparoscopic total gastrectomy and laparotomic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4739248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25861074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-67202015000100017
work_keys_str_mv AT ramagemcarlosalexandregarcao comparisonoflaparoscopictotalgastrectomyandlaparotomictotalgastrectomyforgastriccancer
AT linharesmarcelo comparisonoflaparoscopictotalgastrectomyandlaparotomictotalgastrectomyforgastriccancer
AT lacerdacroiderfranco comparisonoflaparoscopictotalgastrectomyandlaparotomictotalgastrectomyforgastriccancer
AT bertuluccipauloanderson comparisonoflaparoscopictotalgastrectomyandlaparotomictotalgastrectomyforgastriccancer
AT wonrathdurval comparisonoflaparoscopictotalgastrectomyandlaparotomictotalgastrectomyforgastriccancer
AT deoliveiraantoniotalvanetorres comparisonoflaparoscopictotalgastrectomyandlaparotomictotalgastrectomyforgastriccancer