Cargando…
Resulting Shifts in Percentile and Standard Placements after Comparison of the BOD POD and DXA
The purpose of this study was to determine the validity of the BOD POD® when compared to the DXA and if placement on a percentile chart and standard table is affected by any differences between the two measures. A total of 244 (27.7 ± 10.8 yrs, 77.3 ± 16.1 kg, 171.4 ± 10.1 cm, 26.31 ± 5.42 BMI) male...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Berkeley Electronic Press
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4739294/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27182302 |
_version_ | 1782413722471366656 |
---|---|
author | HEDEN, TIMOTHY SHEPARD, STEVE SMITH, JOHN COVINGTON, KAY LECHEMINANT, JAMES |
author_facet | HEDEN, TIMOTHY SHEPARD, STEVE SMITH, JOHN COVINGTON, KAY LECHEMINANT, JAMES |
author_sort | HEDEN, TIMOTHY |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study was to determine the validity of the BOD POD® when compared to the DXA and if placement on a percentile chart and standard table is affected by any differences between the two measures. A total of 244 (27.7 ± 10.8 yrs, 77.3 ± 16.1 kg, 171.4 ± 10.1 cm, 26.31 ± 5.42 BMI) males and females between the ages of 18 and 52 were recruited to participate in this study. The participant’s body fat percentage (%BF) was tested in random order on the BOD POD® and DXA during a 30-minute session following manufacturer’s guidelines and procedures. Dependent t-test indicated the %BF measured by the BOD POD® (23.4% ± 12.8) was significantly lower when compared to the DXA (29.5% ± 12.1), p = .001. The Pearson’s Product moment correlation was 0.95 (p = .001), indicating a very strong relationship between the two instruments. Using estimates of %BF from the BOD POD® also resulted in more favorable shifts on a percentile chart and standard table. Since a high correlation was evident between the two, the BOD POD® can be used as an instrument to track %BF changes over time during a diet and/or exercise intervention. However, caution should be made when classifying %BF with percentile charts or standard tables using the BOD POD® %BF estimates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4739294 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Berkeley Electronic Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47392942016-05-12 Resulting Shifts in Percentile and Standard Placements after Comparison of the BOD POD and DXA HEDEN, TIMOTHY SHEPARD, STEVE SMITH, JOHN COVINGTON, KAY LECHEMINANT, JAMES Int J Exerc Sci Articles The purpose of this study was to determine the validity of the BOD POD® when compared to the DXA and if placement on a percentile chart and standard table is affected by any differences between the two measures. A total of 244 (27.7 ± 10.8 yrs, 77.3 ± 16.1 kg, 171.4 ± 10.1 cm, 26.31 ± 5.42 BMI) males and females between the ages of 18 and 52 were recruited to participate in this study. The participant’s body fat percentage (%BF) was tested in random order on the BOD POD® and DXA during a 30-minute session following manufacturer’s guidelines and procedures. Dependent t-test indicated the %BF measured by the BOD POD® (23.4% ± 12.8) was significantly lower when compared to the DXA (29.5% ± 12.1), p = .001. The Pearson’s Product moment correlation was 0.95 (p = .001), indicating a very strong relationship between the two instruments. Using estimates of %BF from the BOD POD® also resulted in more favorable shifts on a percentile chart and standard table. Since a high correlation was evident between the two, the BOD POD® can be used as an instrument to track %BF changes over time during a diet and/or exercise intervention. However, caution should be made when classifying %BF with percentile charts or standard tables using the BOD POD® %BF estimates. Berkeley Electronic Press 2008-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4739294/ /pubmed/27182302 Text en |
spellingShingle | Articles HEDEN, TIMOTHY SHEPARD, STEVE SMITH, JOHN COVINGTON, KAY LECHEMINANT, JAMES Resulting Shifts in Percentile and Standard Placements after Comparison of the BOD POD and DXA |
title | Resulting Shifts in Percentile and Standard Placements after Comparison of the BOD POD and DXA |
title_full | Resulting Shifts in Percentile and Standard Placements after Comparison of the BOD POD and DXA |
title_fullStr | Resulting Shifts in Percentile and Standard Placements after Comparison of the BOD POD and DXA |
title_full_unstemmed | Resulting Shifts in Percentile and Standard Placements after Comparison of the BOD POD and DXA |
title_short | Resulting Shifts in Percentile and Standard Placements after Comparison of the BOD POD and DXA |
title_sort | resulting shifts in percentile and standard placements after comparison of the bod pod and dxa |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4739294/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27182302 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hedentimothy resultingshiftsinpercentileandstandardplacementsaftercomparisonofthebodpodanddxa AT shepardsteve resultingshiftsinpercentileandstandardplacementsaftercomparisonofthebodpodanddxa AT smithjohn resultingshiftsinpercentileandstandardplacementsaftercomparisonofthebodpodanddxa AT covingtonkay resultingshiftsinpercentileandstandardplacementsaftercomparisonofthebodpodanddxa AT lecheminantjames resultingshiftsinpercentileandstandardplacementsaftercomparisonofthebodpodanddxa |