Cargando…

Resulting Shifts in Percentile and Standard Placements after Comparison of the BOD POD and DXA

The purpose of this study was to determine the validity of the BOD POD® when compared to the DXA and if placement on a percentile chart and standard table is affected by any differences between the two measures. A total of 244 (27.7 ± 10.8 yrs, 77.3 ± 16.1 kg, 171.4 ± 10.1 cm, 26.31 ± 5.42 BMI) male...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: HEDEN, TIMOTHY, SHEPARD, STEVE, SMITH, JOHN, COVINGTON, KAY, LECHEMINANT, JAMES
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Berkeley Electronic Press 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4739294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27182302
_version_ 1782413722471366656
author HEDEN, TIMOTHY
SHEPARD, STEVE
SMITH, JOHN
COVINGTON, KAY
LECHEMINANT, JAMES
author_facet HEDEN, TIMOTHY
SHEPARD, STEVE
SMITH, JOHN
COVINGTON, KAY
LECHEMINANT, JAMES
author_sort HEDEN, TIMOTHY
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to determine the validity of the BOD POD® when compared to the DXA and if placement on a percentile chart and standard table is affected by any differences between the two measures. A total of 244 (27.7 ± 10.8 yrs, 77.3 ± 16.1 kg, 171.4 ± 10.1 cm, 26.31 ± 5.42 BMI) males and females between the ages of 18 and 52 were recruited to participate in this study. The participant’s body fat percentage (%BF) was tested in random order on the BOD POD® and DXA during a 30-minute session following manufacturer’s guidelines and procedures. Dependent t-test indicated the %BF measured by the BOD POD® (23.4% ± 12.8) was significantly lower when compared to the DXA (29.5% ± 12.1), p = .001. The Pearson’s Product moment correlation was 0.95 (p = .001), indicating a very strong relationship between the two instruments. Using estimates of %BF from the BOD POD® also resulted in more favorable shifts on a percentile chart and standard table. Since a high correlation was evident between the two, the BOD POD® can be used as an instrument to track %BF changes over time during a diet and/or exercise intervention. However, caution should be made when classifying %BF with percentile charts or standard tables using the BOD POD® %BF estimates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4739294
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Berkeley Electronic Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47392942016-05-12 Resulting Shifts in Percentile and Standard Placements after Comparison of the BOD POD and DXA HEDEN, TIMOTHY SHEPARD, STEVE SMITH, JOHN COVINGTON, KAY LECHEMINANT, JAMES Int J Exerc Sci Articles The purpose of this study was to determine the validity of the BOD POD® when compared to the DXA and if placement on a percentile chart and standard table is affected by any differences between the two measures. A total of 244 (27.7 ± 10.8 yrs, 77.3 ± 16.1 kg, 171.4 ± 10.1 cm, 26.31 ± 5.42 BMI) males and females between the ages of 18 and 52 were recruited to participate in this study. The participant’s body fat percentage (%BF) was tested in random order on the BOD POD® and DXA during a 30-minute session following manufacturer’s guidelines and procedures. Dependent t-test indicated the %BF measured by the BOD POD® (23.4% ± 12.8) was significantly lower when compared to the DXA (29.5% ± 12.1), p = .001. The Pearson’s Product moment correlation was 0.95 (p = .001), indicating a very strong relationship between the two instruments. Using estimates of %BF from the BOD POD® also resulted in more favorable shifts on a percentile chart and standard table. Since a high correlation was evident between the two, the BOD POD® can be used as an instrument to track %BF changes over time during a diet and/or exercise intervention. However, caution should be made when classifying %BF with percentile charts or standard tables using the BOD POD® %BF estimates. Berkeley Electronic Press 2008-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4739294/ /pubmed/27182302 Text en
spellingShingle Articles
HEDEN, TIMOTHY
SHEPARD, STEVE
SMITH, JOHN
COVINGTON, KAY
LECHEMINANT, JAMES
Resulting Shifts in Percentile and Standard Placements after Comparison of the BOD POD and DXA
title Resulting Shifts in Percentile and Standard Placements after Comparison of the BOD POD and DXA
title_full Resulting Shifts in Percentile and Standard Placements after Comparison of the BOD POD and DXA
title_fullStr Resulting Shifts in Percentile and Standard Placements after Comparison of the BOD POD and DXA
title_full_unstemmed Resulting Shifts in Percentile and Standard Placements after Comparison of the BOD POD and DXA
title_short Resulting Shifts in Percentile and Standard Placements after Comparison of the BOD POD and DXA
title_sort resulting shifts in percentile and standard placements after comparison of the bod pod and dxa
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4739294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27182302
work_keys_str_mv AT hedentimothy resultingshiftsinpercentileandstandardplacementsaftercomparisonofthebodpodanddxa
AT shepardsteve resultingshiftsinpercentileandstandardplacementsaftercomparisonofthebodpodanddxa
AT smithjohn resultingshiftsinpercentileandstandardplacementsaftercomparisonofthebodpodanddxa
AT covingtonkay resultingshiftsinpercentileandstandardplacementsaftercomparisonofthebodpodanddxa
AT lecheminantjames resultingshiftsinpercentileandstandardplacementsaftercomparisonofthebodpodanddxa