Cargando…

Designing a sampling scheme to reveal correlations between weeds and soil properties at multiple spatial scales

Weeds tend to aggregate in patches within fields, and there is evidence that this is partly owing to variation in soil properties. Because the processes driving soil heterogeneity operate at various scales, the strength of the relations between soil properties and weed density would also be expected...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Metcalfe, H, Milne, A E, Webster, R, Lark, R M, Murdoch, A J, Storkey, J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4739553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26877560
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/wre.12184
_version_ 1782413766343786496
author Metcalfe, H
Milne, A E
Webster, R
Lark, R M
Murdoch, A J
Storkey, J
author_facet Metcalfe, H
Milne, A E
Webster, R
Lark, R M
Murdoch, A J
Storkey, J
author_sort Metcalfe, H
collection PubMed
description Weeds tend to aggregate in patches within fields, and there is evidence that this is partly owing to variation in soil properties. Because the processes driving soil heterogeneity operate at various scales, the strength of the relations between soil properties and weed density would also be expected to be scale‐dependent. Quantifying these effects of scale on weed patch dynamics is essential to guide the design of discrete sampling protocols for mapping weed distribution. We developed a general method that uses novel within‐field nested sampling and residual maximum‐likelihood (reml) estimation to explore scale‐dependent relations between weeds and soil properties. We validated the method using a case study of Alopecurus myosuroides in winter wheat. Using reml, we partitioned the variance and covariance into scale‐specific components and estimated the correlations between the weed counts and soil properties at each scale. We used variograms to quantify the spatial structure in the data and to map variables by kriging. Our methodology successfully captured the effect of scale on a number of edaphic drivers of weed patchiness. The overall Pearson correlations between A. myosuroides and soil organic matter and clay content were weak and masked the stronger correlations at >50 m. Knowing how the variance was partitioned across the spatial scales, we optimised the sampling design to focus sampling effort at those scales that contributed most to the total variance. The methods have the potential to guide patch spraying of weeds by identifying areas of the field that are vulnerable to weed establishment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4739553
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47395532016-02-12 Designing a sampling scheme to reveal correlations between weeds and soil properties at multiple spatial scales Metcalfe, H Milne, A E Webster, R Lark, R M Murdoch, A J Storkey, J Weed Res Methods Weeds tend to aggregate in patches within fields, and there is evidence that this is partly owing to variation in soil properties. Because the processes driving soil heterogeneity operate at various scales, the strength of the relations between soil properties and weed density would also be expected to be scale‐dependent. Quantifying these effects of scale on weed patch dynamics is essential to guide the design of discrete sampling protocols for mapping weed distribution. We developed a general method that uses novel within‐field nested sampling and residual maximum‐likelihood (reml) estimation to explore scale‐dependent relations between weeds and soil properties. We validated the method using a case study of Alopecurus myosuroides in winter wheat. Using reml, we partitioned the variance and covariance into scale‐specific components and estimated the correlations between the weed counts and soil properties at each scale. We used variograms to quantify the spatial structure in the data and to map variables by kriging. Our methodology successfully captured the effect of scale on a number of edaphic drivers of weed patchiness. The overall Pearson correlations between A. myosuroides and soil organic matter and clay content were weak and masked the stronger correlations at >50 m. Knowing how the variance was partitioned across the spatial scales, we optimised the sampling design to focus sampling effort at those scales that contributed most to the total variance. The methods have the potential to guide patch spraying of weeds by identifying areas of the field that are vulnerable to weed establishment. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-11-20 2016-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4739553/ /pubmed/26877560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/wre.12184 Text en © 2015 The Authors Weed Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Weed Research Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methods
Metcalfe, H
Milne, A E
Webster, R
Lark, R M
Murdoch, A J
Storkey, J
Designing a sampling scheme to reveal correlations between weeds and soil properties at multiple spatial scales
title Designing a sampling scheme to reveal correlations between weeds and soil properties at multiple spatial scales
title_full Designing a sampling scheme to reveal correlations between weeds and soil properties at multiple spatial scales
title_fullStr Designing a sampling scheme to reveal correlations between weeds and soil properties at multiple spatial scales
title_full_unstemmed Designing a sampling scheme to reveal correlations between weeds and soil properties at multiple spatial scales
title_short Designing a sampling scheme to reveal correlations between weeds and soil properties at multiple spatial scales
title_sort designing a sampling scheme to reveal correlations between weeds and soil properties at multiple spatial scales
topic Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4739553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26877560
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/wre.12184
work_keys_str_mv AT metcalfeh designingasamplingschemetorevealcorrelationsbetweenweedsandsoilpropertiesatmultiplespatialscales
AT milneae designingasamplingschemetorevealcorrelationsbetweenweedsandsoilpropertiesatmultiplespatialscales
AT websterr designingasamplingschemetorevealcorrelationsbetweenweedsandsoilpropertiesatmultiplespatialscales
AT larkrm designingasamplingschemetorevealcorrelationsbetweenweedsandsoilpropertiesatmultiplespatialscales
AT murdochaj designingasamplingschemetorevealcorrelationsbetweenweedsandsoilpropertiesatmultiplespatialscales
AT storkeyj designingasamplingschemetorevealcorrelationsbetweenweedsandsoilpropertiesatmultiplespatialscales