Cargando…
Searching for the Optimal Sampling Solution: Variation in Invertebrate Communities, Sample Condition and DNA Quality
There is a great demand for standardising biodiversity assessments in order to allow optimal comparison across research groups. For invertebrates, pitfall or flight-interception traps are commonly used, but sampling solution differs widely between studies, which could influence the communities colle...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4740435/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26840598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148247 |
_version_ | 1782413845223964672 |
---|---|
author | Gossner, Martin M. Struwe, Jan-Frederic Sturm, Sarah Max, Simeon McCutcheon, Michelle Weisser, Wolfgang W. Zytynska, Sharon E. |
author_facet | Gossner, Martin M. Struwe, Jan-Frederic Sturm, Sarah Max, Simeon McCutcheon, Michelle Weisser, Wolfgang W. Zytynska, Sharon E. |
author_sort | Gossner, Martin M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is a great demand for standardising biodiversity assessments in order to allow optimal comparison across research groups. For invertebrates, pitfall or flight-interception traps are commonly used, but sampling solution differs widely between studies, which could influence the communities collected and affect sample processing (morphological or genetic). We assessed arthropod communities with flight-interception traps using three commonly used sampling solutions across two forest types and two vertical strata. We first considered the effect of sampling solution and its interaction with forest type, vertical stratum, and position of sampling jar at the trap on sample condition and community composition. We found that samples collected in copper sulphate were more mouldy and fragmented relative to other solutions which might impair morphological identification, but condition depended on forest type, trap type and the position of the jar. Community composition, based on order-level identification, did not differ across sampling solutions and only varied with forest type and vertical stratum. Species richness and species-level community composition, however, differed greatly among sampling solutions. Renner solution was highly attractant for beetles and repellent for true bugs. Secondly, we tested whether sampling solution affects subsequent molecular analyses and found that DNA barcoding success was species-specific. Samples from copper sulphate produced the fewest successful DNA sequences for genetic identification, and since DNA yield or quality was not particularly reduced in these samples additional interactions between the solution and DNA must also be occurring. Our results show that the choice of sampling solution should be an important consideration in biodiversity studies. Due to the potential bias towards or against certain species by Ethanol-containing sampling solution we suggest ethylene glycol as a suitable sampling solution when genetic analysis tools are to be used and copper sulphate when focusing on morphological species identification and facing financial restrictions in biodiversity studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4740435 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47404352016-02-11 Searching for the Optimal Sampling Solution: Variation in Invertebrate Communities, Sample Condition and DNA Quality Gossner, Martin M. Struwe, Jan-Frederic Sturm, Sarah Max, Simeon McCutcheon, Michelle Weisser, Wolfgang W. Zytynska, Sharon E. PLoS One Research Article There is a great demand for standardising biodiversity assessments in order to allow optimal comparison across research groups. For invertebrates, pitfall or flight-interception traps are commonly used, but sampling solution differs widely between studies, which could influence the communities collected and affect sample processing (morphological or genetic). We assessed arthropod communities with flight-interception traps using three commonly used sampling solutions across two forest types and two vertical strata. We first considered the effect of sampling solution and its interaction with forest type, vertical stratum, and position of sampling jar at the trap on sample condition and community composition. We found that samples collected in copper sulphate were more mouldy and fragmented relative to other solutions which might impair morphological identification, but condition depended on forest type, trap type and the position of the jar. Community composition, based on order-level identification, did not differ across sampling solutions and only varied with forest type and vertical stratum. Species richness and species-level community composition, however, differed greatly among sampling solutions. Renner solution was highly attractant for beetles and repellent for true bugs. Secondly, we tested whether sampling solution affects subsequent molecular analyses and found that DNA barcoding success was species-specific. Samples from copper sulphate produced the fewest successful DNA sequences for genetic identification, and since DNA yield or quality was not particularly reduced in these samples additional interactions between the solution and DNA must also be occurring. Our results show that the choice of sampling solution should be an important consideration in biodiversity studies. Due to the potential bias towards or against certain species by Ethanol-containing sampling solution we suggest ethylene glycol as a suitable sampling solution when genetic analysis tools are to be used and copper sulphate when focusing on morphological species identification and facing financial restrictions in biodiversity studies. Public Library of Science 2016-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4740435/ /pubmed/26840598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148247 Text en © 2016 Gossner et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gossner, Martin M. Struwe, Jan-Frederic Sturm, Sarah Max, Simeon McCutcheon, Michelle Weisser, Wolfgang W. Zytynska, Sharon E. Searching for the Optimal Sampling Solution: Variation in Invertebrate Communities, Sample Condition and DNA Quality |
title | Searching for the Optimal Sampling Solution: Variation in Invertebrate Communities, Sample Condition and DNA Quality |
title_full | Searching for the Optimal Sampling Solution: Variation in Invertebrate Communities, Sample Condition and DNA Quality |
title_fullStr | Searching for the Optimal Sampling Solution: Variation in Invertebrate Communities, Sample Condition and DNA Quality |
title_full_unstemmed | Searching for the Optimal Sampling Solution: Variation in Invertebrate Communities, Sample Condition and DNA Quality |
title_short | Searching for the Optimal Sampling Solution: Variation in Invertebrate Communities, Sample Condition and DNA Quality |
title_sort | searching for the optimal sampling solution: variation in invertebrate communities, sample condition and dna quality |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4740435/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26840598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148247 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gossnermartinm searchingfortheoptimalsamplingsolutionvariationininvertebratecommunitiessampleconditionanddnaquality AT struwejanfrederic searchingfortheoptimalsamplingsolutionvariationininvertebratecommunitiessampleconditionanddnaquality AT sturmsarah searchingfortheoptimalsamplingsolutionvariationininvertebratecommunitiessampleconditionanddnaquality AT maxsimeon searchingfortheoptimalsamplingsolutionvariationininvertebratecommunitiessampleconditionanddnaquality AT mccutcheonmichelle searchingfortheoptimalsamplingsolutionvariationininvertebratecommunitiessampleconditionanddnaquality AT weisserwolfgangw searchingfortheoptimalsamplingsolutionvariationininvertebratecommunitiessampleconditionanddnaquality AT zytynskasharone searchingfortheoptimalsamplingsolutionvariationininvertebratecommunitiessampleconditionanddnaquality |