Cargando…

Is Tamsulosin 0.2 mg Effective and Safe as a First-Line Treatment Compared with Other Alpha Blockers?: A Meta-Analysis and a Moderator Focused Study

PURPOSE: Tamsulosin 0.2 mg is used widely in Asian people, but the low dose has been studied less than tamsulosin 0.4 mg or other alpha blockers of standard dose. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of tamsulosin 0.2 mg by a meta-analysis and meta-regression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shim, Sung Ryul, Kim, Jae Heon, Chang, In Ho, Shin, In Soo, Hwang, Sung Dong, Kim, Khae Hwan, Yoon, Sang Jin, Song, Yun Seob
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4740534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26847294
http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2016.57.2.407
_version_ 1782413866674683904
author Shim, Sung Ryul
Kim, Jae Heon
Chang, In Ho
Shin, In Soo
Hwang, Sung Dong
Kim, Khae Hwan
Yoon, Sang Jin
Song, Yun Seob
author_facet Shim, Sung Ryul
Kim, Jae Heon
Chang, In Ho
Shin, In Soo
Hwang, Sung Dong
Kim, Khae Hwan
Yoon, Sang Jin
Song, Yun Seob
author_sort Shim, Sung Ryul
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Tamsulosin 0.2 mg is used widely in Asian people, but the low dose has been studied less than tamsulosin 0.4 mg or other alpha blockers of standard dose. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of tamsulosin 0.2 mg by a meta-analysis and meta-regression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis of efficacy of tamsulosin 0.2 mg using International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), maximal urinary flow rate (Qmax), post-voided residual volume (PVR), and quality of life (QoL). Safety was analyzed using adverse events. Relevant studies were searched using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane library from January 1980 to June 2013. RESULTS: Ten studies were included with a total sample size of 1418 subjects [722 tamsulosin 0.2 mg group and 696 other alpha-blockers (terazosin, doxazosin, naftopidil, silodosin) group]. Study duration ranged from 4 to 24 weeks. The pooled overall standardized mean differences (SMD) in the mean change of IPSS from baseline for the tamsulosin group versus the control group was 0.02 [95% confidence interval (CI); -0.20, 0.25]. The pooled overall SMD in the mean change of QoL from baseline for the tamsulosin group versus the control group was 0.16 (95% CI; -0.16, 0.48). The regression analysis with the continuous variables (number of patients, study duration) revealed no significance in all outcomes as IPSS, QoL, and Qmax. CONCLUSION: This study clarifies that tamsulosin 0.2 mg has similar efficacy and fewer adverse events compared with other alpha-blockers as an initial treatment strategy for men with lower urinary tract symptoms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4740534
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Yonsei University College of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47405342016-03-01 Is Tamsulosin 0.2 mg Effective and Safe as a First-Line Treatment Compared with Other Alpha Blockers?: A Meta-Analysis and a Moderator Focused Study Shim, Sung Ryul Kim, Jae Heon Chang, In Ho Shin, In Soo Hwang, Sung Dong Kim, Khae Hwan Yoon, Sang Jin Song, Yun Seob Yonsei Med J Original Article PURPOSE: Tamsulosin 0.2 mg is used widely in Asian people, but the low dose has been studied less than tamsulosin 0.4 mg or other alpha blockers of standard dose. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of tamsulosin 0.2 mg by a meta-analysis and meta-regression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis of efficacy of tamsulosin 0.2 mg using International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), maximal urinary flow rate (Qmax), post-voided residual volume (PVR), and quality of life (QoL). Safety was analyzed using adverse events. Relevant studies were searched using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane library from January 1980 to June 2013. RESULTS: Ten studies were included with a total sample size of 1418 subjects [722 tamsulosin 0.2 mg group and 696 other alpha-blockers (terazosin, doxazosin, naftopidil, silodosin) group]. Study duration ranged from 4 to 24 weeks. The pooled overall standardized mean differences (SMD) in the mean change of IPSS from baseline for the tamsulosin group versus the control group was 0.02 [95% confidence interval (CI); -0.20, 0.25]. The pooled overall SMD in the mean change of QoL from baseline for the tamsulosin group versus the control group was 0.16 (95% CI; -0.16, 0.48). The regression analysis with the continuous variables (number of patients, study duration) revealed no significance in all outcomes as IPSS, QoL, and Qmax. CONCLUSION: This study clarifies that tamsulosin 0.2 mg has similar efficacy and fewer adverse events compared with other alpha-blockers as an initial treatment strategy for men with lower urinary tract symptoms. Yonsei University College of Medicine 2016-03-01 2016-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4740534/ /pubmed/26847294 http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2016.57.2.407 Text en © Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Shim, Sung Ryul
Kim, Jae Heon
Chang, In Ho
Shin, In Soo
Hwang, Sung Dong
Kim, Khae Hwan
Yoon, Sang Jin
Song, Yun Seob
Is Tamsulosin 0.2 mg Effective and Safe as a First-Line Treatment Compared with Other Alpha Blockers?: A Meta-Analysis and a Moderator Focused Study
title Is Tamsulosin 0.2 mg Effective and Safe as a First-Line Treatment Compared with Other Alpha Blockers?: A Meta-Analysis and a Moderator Focused Study
title_full Is Tamsulosin 0.2 mg Effective and Safe as a First-Line Treatment Compared with Other Alpha Blockers?: A Meta-Analysis and a Moderator Focused Study
title_fullStr Is Tamsulosin 0.2 mg Effective and Safe as a First-Line Treatment Compared with Other Alpha Blockers?: A Meta-Analysis and a Moderator Focused Study
title_full_unstemmed Is Tamsulosin 0.2 mg Effective and Safe as a First-Line Treatment Compared with Other Alpha Blockers?: A Meta-Analysis and a Moderator Focused Study
title_short Is Tamsulosin 0.2 mg Effective and Safe as a First-Line Treatment Compared with Other Alpha Blockers?: A Meta-Analysis and a Moderator Focused Study
title_sort is tamsulosin 0.2 mg effective and safe as a first-line treatment compared with other alpha blockers?: a meta-analysis and a moderator focused study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4740534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26847294
http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2016.57.2.407
work_keys_str_mv AT shimsungryul istamsulosin02mgeffectiveandsafeasafirstlinetreatmentcomparedwithotheralphablockersametaanalysisandamoderatorfocusedstudy
AT kimjaeheon istamsulosin02mgeffectiveandsafeasafirstlinetreatmentcomparedwithotheralphablockersametaanalysisandamoderatorfocusedstudy
AT changinho istamsulosin02mgeffectiveandsafeasafirstlinetreatmentcomparedwithotheralphablockersametaanalysisandamoderatorfocusedstudy
AT shininsoo istamsulosin02mgeffectiveandsafeasafirstlinetreatmentcomparedwithotheralphablockersametaanalysisandamoderatorfocusedstudy
AT hwangsungdong istamsulosin02mgeffectiveandsafeasafirstlinetreatmentcomparedwithotheralphablockersametaanalysisandamoderatorfocusedstudy
AT kimkhaehwan istamsulosin02mgeffectiveandsafeasafirstlinetreatmentcomparedwithotheralphablockersametaanalysisandamoderatorfocusedstudy
AT yoonsangjin istamsulosin02mgeffectiveandsafeasafirstlinetreatmentcomparedwithotheralphablockersametaanalysisandamoderatorfocusedstudy
AT songyunseob istamsulosin02mgeffectiveandsafeasafirstlinetreatmentcomparedwithotheralphablockersametaanalysisandamoderatorfocusedstudy