Cargando…
Is Tamsulosin 0.2 mg Effective and Safe as a First-Line Treatment Compared with Other Alpha Blockers?: A Meta-Analysis and a Moderator Focused Study
PURPOSE: Tamsulosin 0.2 mg is used widely in Asian people, but the low dose has been studied less than tamsulosin 0.4 mg or other alpha blockers of standard dose. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of tamsulosin 0.2 mg by a meta-analysis and meta-regression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We co...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Yonsei University College of Medicine
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4740534/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26847294 http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2016.57.2.407 |
_version_ | 1782413866674683904 |
---|---|
author | Shim, Sung Ryul Kim, Jae Heon Chang, In Ho Shin, In Soo Hwang, Sung Dong Kim, Khae Hwan Yoon, Sang Jin Song, Yun Seob |
author_facet | Shim, Sung Ryul Kim, Jae Heon Chang, In Ho Shin, In Soo Hwang, Sung Dong Kim, Khae Hwan Yoon, Sang Jin Song, Yun Seob |
author_sort | Shim, Sung Ryul |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Tamsulosin 0.2 mg is used widely in Asian people, but the low dose has been studied less than tamsulosin 0.4 mg or other alpha blockers of standard dose. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of tamsulosin 0.2 mg by a meta-analysis and meta-regression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis of efficacy of tamsulosin 0.2 mg using International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), maximal urinary flow rate (Qmax), post-voided residual volume (PVR), and quality of life (QoL). Safety was analyzed using adverse events. Relevant studies were searched using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane library from January 1980 to June 2013. RESULTS: Ten studies were included with a total sample size of 1418 subjects [722 tamsulosin 0.2 mg group and 696 other alpha-blockers (terazosin, doxazosin, naftopidil, silodosin) group]. Study duration ranged from 4 to 24 weeks. The pooled overall standardized mean differences (SMD) in the mean change of IPSS from baseline for the tamsulosin group versus the control group was 0.02 [95% confidence interval (CI); -0.20, 0.25]. The pooled overall SMD in the mean change of QoL from baseline for the tamsulosin group versus the control group was 0.16 (95% CI; -0.16, 0.48). The regression analysis with the continuous variables (number of patients, study duration) revealed no significance in all outcomes as IPSS, QoL, and Qmax. CONCLUSION: This study clarifies that tamsulosin 0.2 mg has similar efficacy and fewer adverse events compared with other alpha-blockers as an initial treatment strategy for men with lower urinary tract symptoms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4740534 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Yonsei University College of Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47405342016-03-01 Is Tamsulosin 0.2 mg Effective and Safe as a First-Line Treatment Compared with Other Alpha Blockers?: A Meta-Analysis and a Moderator Focused Study Shim, Sung Ryul Kim, Jae Heon Chang, In Ho Shin, In Soo Hwang, Sung Dong Kim, Khae Hwan Yoon, Sang Jin Song, Yun Seob Yonsei Med J Original Article PURPOSE: Tamsulosin 0.2 mg is used widely in Asian people, but the low dose has been studied less than tamsulosin 0.4 mg or other alpha blockers of standard dose. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of tamsulosin 0.2 mg by a meta-analysis and meta-regression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis of efficacy of tamsulosin 0.2 mg using International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), maximal urinary flow rate (Qmax), post-voided residual volume (PVR), and quality of life (QoL). Safety was analyzed using adverse events. Relevant studies were searched using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane library from January 1980 to June 2013. RESULTS: Ten studies were included with a total sample size of 1418 subjects [722 tamsulosin 0.2 mg group and 696 other alpha-blockers (terazosin, doxazosin, naftopidil, silodosin) group]. Study duration ranged from 4 to 24 weeks. The pooled overall standardized mean differences (SMD) in the mean change of IPSS from baseline for the tamsulosin group versus the control group was 0.02 [95% confidence interval (CI); -0.20, 0.25]. The pooled overall SMD in the mean change of QoL from baseline for the tamsulosin group versus the control group was 0.16 (95% CI; -0.16, 0.48). The regression analysis with the continuous variables (number of patients, study duration) revealed no significance in all outcomes as IPSS, QoL, and Qmax. CONCLUSION: This study clarifies that tamsulosin 0.2 mg has similar efficacy and fewer adverse events compared with other alpha-blockers as an initial treatment strategy for men with lower urinary tract symptoms. Yonsei University College of Medicine 2016-03-01 2016-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4740534/ /pubmed/26847294 http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2016.57.2.407 Text en © Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Shim, Sung Ryul Kim, Jae Heon Chang, In Ho Shin, In Soo Hwang, Sung Dong Kim, Khae Hwan Yoon, Sang Jin Song, Yun Seob Is Tamsulosin 0.2 mg Effective and Safe as a First-Line Treatment Compared with Other Alpha Blockers?: A Meta-Analysis and a Moderator Focused Study |
title | Is Tamsulosin 0.2 mg Effective and Safe as a First-Line Treatment Compared with Other Alpha Blockers?: A Meta-Analysis and a Moderator Focused Study |
title_full | Is Tamsulosin 0.2 mg Effective and Safe as a First-Line Treatment Compared with Other Alpha Blockers?: A Meta-Analysis and a Moderator Focused Study |
title_fullStr | Is Tamsulosin 0.2 mg Effective and Safe as a First-Line Treatment Compared with Other Alpha Blockers?: A Meta-Analysis and a Moderator Focused Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Is Tamsulosin 0.2 mg Effective and Safe as a First-Line Treatment Compared with Other Alpha Blockers?: A Meta-Analysis and a Moderator Focused Study |
title_short | Is Tamsulosin 0.2 mg Effective and Safe as a First-Line Treatment Compared with Other Alpha Blockers?: A Meta-Analysis and a Moderator Focused Study |
title_sort | is tamsulosin 0.2 mg effective and safe as a first-line treatment compared with other alpha blockers?: a meta-analysis and a moderator focused study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4740534/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26847294 http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2016.57.2.407 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shimsungryul istamsulosin02mgeffectiveandsafeasafirstlinetreatmentcomparedwithotheralphablockersametaanalysisandamoderatorfocusedstudy AT kimjaeheon istamsulosin02mgeffectiveandsafeasafirstlinetreatmentcomparedwithotheralphablockersametaanalysisandamoderatorfocusedstudy AT changinho istamsulosin02mgeffectiveandsafeasafirstlinetreatmentcomparedwithotheralphablockersametaanalysisandamoderatorfocusedstudy AT shininsoo istamsulosin02mgeffectiveandsafeasafirstlinetreatmentcomparedwithotheralphablockersametaanalysisandamoderatorfocusedstudy AT hwangsungdong istamsulosin02mgeffectiveandsafeasafirstlinetreatmentcomparedwithotheralphablockersametaanalysisandamoderatorfocusedstudy AT kimkhaehwan istamsulosin02mgeffectiveandsafeasafirstlinetreatmentcomparedwithotheralphablockersametaanalysisandamoderatorfocusedstudy AT yoonsangjin istamsulosin02mgeffectiveandsafeasafirstlinetreatmentcomparedwithotheralphablockersametaanalysisandamoderatorfocusedstudy AT songyunseob istamsulosin02mgeffectiveandsafeasafirstlinetreatmentcomparedwithotheralphablockersametaanalysisandamoderatorfocusedstudy |