Cargando…

The Cost Effectiveness of Maintenance Schedules Following Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: An Economic Evaluation Alongside a Randomised Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) affects approximately 3 million people in the UK. An 8-week pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) course is recommended under current guidelines. However, studies show that initial benefits diminish over time. OBJECTIVE: We present here an economic ev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burns, Darren K., Wilson, Edward C. F., Browne, Paula, Olive, Sandra, Clark, Allan, Galey, Penny, Dix, Emma, Woodhouse, Helene, Robinson, Sue, Wilson, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4740569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26346590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40258-015-0199-9
_version_ 1782413874650152960
author Burns, Darren K.
Wilson, Edward C. F.
Browne, Paula
Olive, Sandra
Clark, Allan
Galey, Penny
Dix, Emma
Woodhouse, Helene
Robinson, Sue
Wilson, Andrew
author_facet Burns, Darren K.
Wilson, Edward C. F.
Browne, Paula
Olive, Sandra
Clark, Allan
Galey, Penny
Dix, Emma
Woodhouse, Helene
Robinson, Sue
Wilson, Andrew
author_sort Burns, Darren K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) affects approximately 3 million people in the UK. An 8-week pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) course is recommended under current guidelines. However, studies show that initial benefits diminish over time. OBJECTIVE: We present here an economic evaluation conducted alongside a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of a low-intensity maintenance programme over a time horizon of 1 year delivered in UK primary and secondary care settings. METHODS: Patients with COPD who completed at least 60 % of a standard 8-week PR programme were randomised to a 2-h maintenance session at 3, 6 and 9 months (n = 73) or treatment as usual (n = 75). Outcomes were change in Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ) score, EQ-5D-based QALYs, cost (price year 2014) to the UK NHS and social services over the 12 months following initial PR, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). RESULTS: At 12 months, incremental cost to the NHS and social services was −£204.04 (95 % CI −£1522 to £1114). Incremental CRQ and QALY gains were −0.007 (−0.461 to 0.447) and +0.015 (−0.050 to 0.079), respectively. Based on point estimates, PR maintenance therefore dominates treatment as usual from the perspective of the NHS and social services in terms of cost per QALY gained. Whether it is cost effective in terms of CRQ depends on whether the £204 per patient could be reinvested elsewhere to a CRQ gain of greater than 0.007. However, there is much decision uncertainty: 95 % CIs around increments did not exclude zero, and there is a 72.9 % (72.5 %) probability that the ICER is below £20,000 (£30,000) per QALY. CONCLUSION: Future research should explore whether more intensive maintenance regimens offer benefit to patients at reasonable cost. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40258-015-0199-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4740569
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47405692016-02-12 The Cost Effectiveness of Maintenance Schedules Following Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: An Economic Evaluation Alongside a Randomised Controlled Trial Burns, Darren K. Wilson, Edward C. F. Browne, Paula Olive, Sandra Clark, Allan Galey, Penny Dix, Emma Woodhouse, Helene Robinson, Sue Wilson, Andrew Appl Health Econ Health Policy Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) affects approximately 3 million people in the UK. An 8-week pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) course is recommended under current guidelines. However, studies show that initial benefits diminish over time. OBJECTIVE: We present here an economic evaluation conducted alongside a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of a low-intensity maintenance programme over a time horizon of 1 year delivered in UK primary and secondary care settings. METHODS: Patients with COPD who completed at least 60 % of a standard 8-week PR programme were randomised to a 2-h maintenance session at 3, 6 and 9 months (n = 73) or treatment as usual (n = 75). Outcomes were change in Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ) score, EQ-5D-based QALYs, cost (price year 2014) to the UK NHS and social services over the 12 months following initial PR, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). RESULTS: At 12 months, incremental cost to the NHS and social services was −£204.04 (95 % CI −£1522 to £1114). Incremental CRQ and QALY gains were −0.007 (−0.461 to 0.447) and +0.015 (−0.050 to 0.079), respectively. Based on point estimates, PR maintenance therefore dominates treatment as usual from the perspective of the NHS and social services in terms of cost per QALY gained. Whether it is cost effective in terms of CRQ depends on whether the £204 per patient could be reinvested elsewhere to a CRQ gain of greater than 0.007. However, there is much decision uncertainty: 95 % CIs around increments did not exclude zero, and there is a 72.9 % (72.5 %) probability that the ICER is below £20,000 (£30,000) per QALY. CONCLUSION: Future research should explore whether more intensive maintenance regimens offer benefit to patients at reasonable cost. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40258-015-0199-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2015-09-07 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4740569/ /pubmed/26346590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40258-015-0199-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Burns, Darren K.
Wilson, Edward C. F.
Browne, Paula
Olive, Sandra
Clark, Allan
Galey, Penny
Dix, Emma
Woodhouse, Helene
Robinson, Sue
Wilson, Andrew
The Cost Effectiveness of Maintenance Schedules Following Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: An Economic Evaluation Alongside a Randomised Controlled Trial
title The Cost Effectiveness of Maintenance Schedules Following Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: An Economic Evaluation Alongside a Randomised Controlled Trial
title_full The Cost Effectiveness of Maintenance Schedules Following Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: An Economic Evaluation Alongside a Randomised Controlled Trial
title_fullStr The Cost Effectiveness of Maintenance Schedules Following Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: An Economic Evaluation Alongside a Randomised Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed The Cost Effectiveness of Maintenance Schedules Following Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: An Economic Evaluation Alongside a Randomised Controlled Trial
title_short The Cost Effectiveness of Maintenance Schedules Following Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: An Economic Evaluation Alongside a Randomised Controlled Trial
title_sort cost effectiveness of maintenance schedules following pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: an economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4740569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26346590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40258-015-0199-9
work_keys_str_mv AT burnsdarrenk thecosteffectivenessofmaintenanceschedulesfollowingpulmonaryrehabilitationinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseaneconomicevaluationalongsidearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT wilsonedwardcf thecosteffectivenessofmaintenanceschedulesfollowingpulmonaryrehabilitationinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseaneconomicevaluationalongsidearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT brownepaula thecosteffectivenessofmaintenanceschedulesfollowingpulmonaryrehabilitationinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseaneconomicevaluationalongsidearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT olivesandra thecosteffectivenessofmaintenanceschedulesfollowingpulmonaryrehabilitationinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseaneconomicevaluationalongsidearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT clarkallan thecosteffectivenessofmaintenanceschedulesfollowingpulmonaryrehabilitationinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseaneconomicevaluationalongsidearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT galeypenny thecosteffectivenessofmaintenanceschedulesfollowingpulmonaryrehabilitationinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseaneconomicevaluationalongsidearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT dixemma thecosteffectivenessofmaintenanceschedulesfollowingpulmonaryrehabilitationinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseaneconomicevaluationalongsidearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT woodhousehelene thecosteffectivenessofmaintenanceschedulesfollowingpulmonaryrehabilitationinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseaneconomicevaluationalongsidearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT robinsonsue thecosteffectivenessofmaintenanceschedulesfollowingpulmonaryrehabilitationinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseaneconomicevaluationalongsidearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT wilsonandrew thecosteffectivenessofmaintenanceschedulesfollowingpulmonaryrehabilitationinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseaneconomicevaluationalongsidearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT burnsdarrenk costeffectivenessofmaintenanceschedulesfollowingpulmonaryrehabilitationinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseaneconomicevaluationalongsidearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT wilsonedwardcf costeffectivenessofmaintenanceschedulesfollowingpulmonaryrehabilitationinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseaneconomicevaluationalongsidearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT brownepaula costeffectivenessofmaintenanceschedulesfollowingpulmonaryrehabilitationinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseaneconomicevaluationalongsidearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT olivesandra costeffectivenessofmaintenanceschedulesfollowingpulmonaryrehabilitationinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseaneconomicevaluationalongsidearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT clarkallan costeffectivenessofmaintenanceschedulesfollowingpulmonaryrehabilitationinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseaneconomicevaluationalongsidearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT galeypenny costeffectivenessofmaintenanceschedulesfollowingpulmonaryrehabilitationinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseaneconomicevaluationalongsidearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT dixemma costeffectivenessofmaintenanceschedulesfollowingpulmonaryrehabilitationinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseaneconomicevaluationalongsidearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT woodhousehelene costeffectivenessofmaintenanceschedulesfollowingpulmonaryrehabilitationinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseaneconomicevaluationalongsidearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT robinsonsue costeffectivenessofmaintenanceschedulesfollowingpulmonaryrehabilitationinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseaneconomicevaluationalongsidearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT wilsonandrew costeffectivenessofmaintenanceschedulesfollowingpulmonaryrehabilitationinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseaneconomicevaluationalongsidearandomisedcontrolledtrial