Cargando…
Negative outcomes evoke cyclic irrational decisions in Rock, Paper, Scissors
Rock, Paper, Scissors (RPS) represents a unique gaming space in which the predictions of human rational decision-making can be compared with actual performance. Playing a computerized opponent adopting a mixed-strategy equilibrium, participants revealed a non-significant tendency to over-select Rock...
Autores principales: | Dyson, Benjamin James, Wilbiks, Jonathan Michael Paul, Sandhu, Raj, Papanicolaou, Georgios, Lintag, Jaimie |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4740902/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26843423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep20479 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Rock, Paper, Scissors: Game Theory in Everyday Life
por: Fisher, Len
Publicado: (2008) -
Non-Hermitian topology in rock–paper–scissors games
por: Yoshida, Tsuneya, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Behavioural and neural modulation of win-stay but not lose-shift strategies as a function of outcome value in Rock, Paper, Scissors
por: Forder, Lewis, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
An experimental investigation of evolutionary dynamics in the Rock-Paper-Scissors game
por: Hoffman, Moshe, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Social cycling and conditional responses in the Rock-Paper-Scissors game
por: Wang, Zhijian, et al.
Publicado: (2014)