Cargando…
The effect of habitual and experimental antiperspirant and deodorant product use on the armpit microbiome
An ever expanding body of research investigates the human microbiome in general and the skin microbiome in particular. Microbiomes vary greatly from individual to individual. Understanding the factors that account for this variation, however, has proven challenging, with many studies able to account...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4741080/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26855863 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1605 |
_version_ | 1782413943479730176 |
---|---|
author | Urban, Julie Fergus, Daniel J. Savage, Amy M. Ehlers, Megan Menninger, Holly L. Dunn, Robert R. Horvath, Julie E. |
author_facet | Urban, Julie Fergus, Daniel J. Savage, Amy M. Ehlers, Megan Menninger, Holly L. Dunn, Robert R. Horvath, Julie E. |
author_sort | Urban, Julie |
collection | PubMed |
description | An ever expanding body of research investigates the human microbiome in general and the skin microbiome in particular. Microbiomes vary greatly from individual to individual. Understanding the factors that account for this variation, however, has proven challenging, with many studies able to account statistically for just a small proportion of the inter-individual variation in the abundance, species richness or composition of bacteria. The human armpit has long been noted to host a high biomass bacterial community, and recent studies have highlighted substantial inter-individual variation in armpit bacteria, even relative to variation among individuals for other body habitats. One obvious potential explanation for this variation has to do with the use of personal hygiene products, particularly deodorants and antiperspirants. Here we experimentally manipulate product use to examine the abundance, species richness, and composition of bacterial communities that recolonize the armpits of people with different product use habits. In doing so, we find that when deodorant and antiperspirant use were stopped, culturable bacterial density increased and approached that found on individuals who regularly do not use any product. In addition, when antiperspirants were subsequently applied, bacterial density dramatically declined. These culture-based results are in line with sequence-based comparisons of the effects of long-term product use on bacterial species richness and composition. Sequence-based analyses suggested that individuals who habitually use antiperspirant tended to have a greater richness of bacterial OTUs in their armpits than those who use deodorant. In addition, individuals who used antiperspirants or deodorants long-term, but who stopped using product for two or more days as part of this study, had armpit communities dominated by Staphylococcaceae, whereas those of individuals in our study who habitually used no products were dominated by Corynebacterium. Collectively these results suggest a strong effect of product use on the bacterial composition of armpits. Although stopping the use of deodorant and antiperspirant similarly favors presence of Staphylococcaceae over Corynebacterium, their differential modes of action exert strikingly different effects on the richness of other bacteria living in armpit communities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4741080 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47410802016-02-05 The effect of habitual and experimental antiperspirant and deodorant product use on the armpit microbiome Urban, Julie Fergus, Daniel J. Savage, Amy M. Ehlers, Megan Menninger, Holly L. Dunn, Robert R. Horvath, Julie E. PeerJ Ecology An ever expanding body of research investigates the human microbiome in general and the skin microbiome in particular. Microbiomes vary greatly from individual to individual. Understanding the factors that account for this variation, however, has proven challenging, with many studies able to account statistically for just a small proportion of the inter-individual variation in the abundance, species richness or composition of bacteria. The human armpit has long been noted to host a high biomass bacterial community, and recent studies have highlighted substantial inter-individual variation in armpit bacteria, even relative to variation among individuals for other body habitats. One obvious potential explanation for this variation has to do with the use of personal hygiene products, particularly deodorants and antiperspirants. Here we experimentally manipulate product use to examine the abundance, species richness, and composition of bacterial communities that recolonize the armpits of people with different product use habits. In doing so, we find that when deodorant and antiperspirant use were stopped, culturable bacterial density increased and approached that found on individuals who regularly do not use any product. In addition, when antiperspirants were subsequently applied, bacterial density dramatically declined. These culture-based results are in line with sequence-based comparisons of the effects of long-term product use on bacterial species richness and composition. Sequence-based analyses suggested that individuals who habitually use antiperspirant tended to have a greater richness of bacterial OTUs in their armpits than those who use deodorant. In addition, individuals who used antiperspirants or deodorants long-term, but who stopped using product for two or more days as part of this study, had armpit communities dominated by Staphylococcaceae, whereas those of individuals in our study who habitually used no products were dominated by Corynebacterium. Collectively these results suggest a strong effect of product use on the bacterial composition of armpits. Although stopping the use of deodorant and antiperspirant similarly favors presence of Staphylococcaceae over Corynebacterium, their differential modes of action exert strikingly different effects on the richness of other bacteria living in armpit communities. PeerJ Inc. 2016-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4741080/ /pubmed/26855863 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1605 Text en ©2016 Urban et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Ecology Urban, Julie Fergus, Daniel J. Savage, Amy M. Ehlers, Megan Menninger, Holly L. Dunn, Robert R. Horvath, Julie E. The effect of habitual and experimental antiperspirant and deodorant product use on the armpit microbiome |
title | The effect of habitual and experimental antiperspirant and deodorant product use on the armpit microbiome |
title_full | The effect of habitual and experimental antiperspirant and deodorant product use on the armpit microbiome |
title_fullStr | The effect of habitual and experimental antiperspirant and deodorant product use on the armpit microbiome |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of habitual and experimental antiperspirant and deodorant product use on the armpit microbiome |
title_short | The effect of habitual and experimental antiperspirant and deodorant product use on the armpit microbiome |
title_sort | effect of habitual and experimental antiperspirant and deodorant product use on the armpit microbiome |
topic | Ecology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4741080/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26855863 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1605 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT urbanjulie theeffectofhabitualandexperimentalantiperspirantanddeodorantproductuseonthearmpitmicrobiome AT fergusdanielj theeffectofhabitualandexperimentalantiperspirantanddeodorantproductuseonthearmpitmicrobiome AT savageamym theeffectofhabitualandexperimentalantiperspirantanddeodorantproductuseonthearmpitmicrobiome AT ehlersmegan theeffectofhabitualandexperimentalantiperspirantanddeodorantproductuseonthearmpitmicrobiome AT menningerhollyl theeffectofhabitualandexperimentalantiperspirantanddeodorantproductuseonthearmpitmicrobiome AT dunnrobertr theeffectofhabitualandexperimentalantiperspirantanddeodorantproductuseonthearmpitmicrobiome AT horvathjuliee theeffectofhabitualandexperimentalantiperspirantanddeodorantproductuseonthearmpitmicrobiome AT urbanjulie effectofhabitualandexperimentalantiperspirantanddeodorantproductuseonthearmpitmicrobiome AT fergusdanielj effectofhabitualandexperimentalantiperspirantanddeodorantproductuseonthearmpitmicrobiome AT savageamym effectofhabitualandexperimentalantiperspirantanddeodorantproductuseonthearmpitmicrobiome AT ehlersmegan effectofhabitualandexperimentalantiperspirantanddeodorantproductuseonthearmpitmicrobiome AT menningerhollyl effectofhabitualandexperimentalantiperspirantanddeodorantproductuseonthearmpitmicrobiome AT dunnrobertr effectofhabitualandexperimentalantiperspirantanddeodorantproductuseonthearmpitmicrobiome AT horvathjuliee effectofhabitualandexperimentalantiperspirantanddeodorantproductuseonthearmpitmicrobiome |