Cargando…

Poultry consumption and prostate cancer risk: a meta-analysis

Background. Several kinds of foods are hypothesized to be potential factors contributing to the variation of prostate cancer (PCa) incidence. But the effect of poultry on PCa is still inconsistent and no quantitative assessment has been published up to date. So we conducted this meta-analysis to cla...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Qian, Wan, Zheng-ce, Xu, Xiao-bing, Wu, Jing, Xiong, Guang-lian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4741082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26855875
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1646
_version_ 1782413943930617856
author He, Qian
Wan, Zheng-ce
Xu, Xiao-bing
Wu, Jing
Xiong, Guang-lian
author_facet He, Qian
Wan, Zheng-ce
Xu, Xiao-bing
Wu, Jing
Xiong, Guang-lian
author_sort He, Qian
collection PubMed
description Background. Several kinds of foods are hypothesized to be potential factors contributing to the variation of prostate cancer (PCa) incidence. But the effect of poultry on PCa is still inconsistent and no quantitative assessment has been published up to date. So we conducted this meta-analysis to clarify the association between them. Materials and Methods. We conducted a literature search of PubMed and Embase for studies examining the association between poultry consumption and PCa up to June, 2015. Pooled risk ratio (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) of the highest versus lowest poultry consumption categories were calculated by fixed-effect model or random-effect model. Results. A total of 27 (12 cohort and 15 case-control) studies comprising 23,703 cases and 469,986 noncases were eligible for inclusion. The summary RR of total PCa incidence was 1.03 (95% CI [0.95–1.11]) for the highest versus lowest categories of poultry intake. The heterogeneity between studies was not statistically significant (P = 0.768, I(2) = 28.5%). Synthesized analysis of 11 studies on high stage PCa and 8 studies on chicken exposure also demonstrated null association. We also did not obtain significant association in the subgroup of cohort study (RR = 1.04, 95% CI [0.98–1.10]), as well as in the subgroups of population-based case-control study and hospital-based case-control study. Then the studies were divided into three geographic groups: Western countries, Asia and South America. The pooled RRs in these areas did not reveal statistically significant association between poultry and PCa. Conclusions. This meta-analysis suggests no association between poultry consumption and PCa risk. Further well-designed studies are warranted to confirm the result.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4741082
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47410822016-02-05 Poultry consumption and prostate cancer risk: a meta-analysis He, Qian Wan, Zheng-ce Xu, Xiao-bing Wu, Jing Xiong, Guang-lian PeerJ Evidence Based Medicine Background. Several kinds of foods are hypothesized to be potential factors contributing to the variation of prostate cancer (PCa) incidence. But the effect of poultry on PCa is still inconsistent and no quantitative assessment has been published up to date. So we conducted this meta-analysis to clarify the association between them. Materials and Methods. We conducted a literature search of PubMed and Embase for studies examining the association between poultry consumption and PCa up to June, 2015. Pooled risk ratio (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) of the highest versus lowest poultry consumption categories were calculated by fixed-effect model or random-effect model. Results. A total of 27 (12 cohort and 15 case-control) studies comprising 23,703 cases and 469,986 noncases were eligible for inclusion. The summary RR of total PCa incidence was 1.03 (95% CI [0.95–1.11]) for the highest versus lowest categories of poultry intake. The heterogeneity between studies was not statistically significant (P = 0.768, I(2) = 28.5%). Synthesized analysis of 11 studies on high stage PCa and 8 studies on chicken exposure also demonstrated null association. We also did not obtain significant association in the subgroup of cohort study (RR = 1.04, 95% CI [0.98–1.10]), as well as in the subgroups of population-based case-control study and hospital-based case-control study. Then the studies were divided into three geographic groups: Western countries, Asia and South America. The pooled RRs in these areas did not reveal statistically significant association between poultry and PCa. Conclusions. This meta-analysis suggests no association between poultry consumption and PCa risk. Further well-designed studies are warranted to confirm the result. PeerJ Inc. 2016-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4741082/ /pubmed/26855875 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1646 Text en ©2016 He et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Evidence Based Medicine
He, Qian
Wan, Zheng-ce
Xu, Xiao-bing
Wu, Jing
Xiong, Guang-lian
Poultry consumption and prostate cancer risk: a meta-analysis
title Poultry consumption and prostate cancer risk: a meta-analysis
title_full Poultry consumption and prostate cancer risk: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Poultry consumption and prostate cancer risk: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Poultry consumption and prostate cancer risk: a meta-analysis
title_short Poultry consumption and prostate cancer risk: a meta-analysis
title_sort poultry consumption and prostate cancer risk: a meta-analysis
topic Evidence Based Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4741082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26855875
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1646
work_keys_str_mv AT heqian poultryconsumptionandprostatecancerriskametaanalysis
AT wanzhengce poultryconsumptionandprostatecancerriskametaanalysis
AT xuxiaobing poultryconsumptionandprostatecancerriskametaanalysis
AT wujing poultryconsumptionandprostatecancerriskametaanalysis
AT xiongguanglian poultryconsumptionandprostatecancerriskametaanalysis