Cargando…

Intraocular Pressure Control after Trabeculectomy, Phacotrabeculectomy and Phacoemulsification in a Hispanic Population

Purpose: To compare the efficacy of different surgical strategies for intraocular pressure (IOP) control in Hispanic glaucoma patients with and without visually significant cataracts. Design: Comparative retrospective consecutive case series. Methods: The charts of 153 consecutive patients with prim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: L Jung, Jennifer, Isida-Llerandi, Cristina G, Lazcano-Gomez, Gabriel, SooHoo, Jeffrey R, Kahook, Malik Y
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4741170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26997812
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10008-1164
_version_ 1782413959853244416
author L Jung, Jennifer
Isida-Llerandi, Cristina G
Lazcano-Gomez, Gabriel
SooHoo, Jeffrey R
Kahook, Malik Y
author_facet L Jung, Jennifer
Isida-Llerandi, Cristina G
Lazcano-Gomez, Gabriel
SooHoo, Jeffrey R
Kahook, Malik Y
author_sort L Jung, Jennifer
collection PubMed
description Purpose: To compare the efficacy of different surgical strategies for intraocular pressure (IOP) control in Hispanic glaucoma patients with and without visually significant cataracts. Design: Comparative retrospective consecutive case series. Methods: The charts of 153 consecutive patients with primary open angle glaucoma who underwent either trabeculectomy alone (n = 51), phacotrabeculectomy (n = 51), or phacoemulsification alone (n = 51) were reviewed to compare IOP control, the number of glaucoma medications required postoperatively, and the inci dence of surgical complications. Results: Preoperative IOP was 17.5 ± 5.2 mm Hg in the trabe-culectomy group, 15.4 ± 4.5 mm Hg in the phacotrabeculectomy group and 13.9 ± 2.9 mm Hg in the phacoemulsification group (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Mean IOP reduction from baseline was 4.2 ± 6.9 (24.6%) for the trabeculectomy group, 2.9 ± 5.0 (20.8%) for the phacotrabeculectomy group, and 0.9 ± 3.4 (6.5%) for the phacoemulsification group (p = 0.009). The number of IOP-lowering medications required postoperatively decreased significantly in all three groups (p = 0.001). The rate of early and late postoperative complications was similar between the trabeculectomy and phacotrabeculectomy groups and less for the phacoemulsification group. Conclusion: Trabeculectomy and phacotrabeculectomy are both viable surgical options for managing open angle glau coma. Both resulted in similar rates of success, IOP reduction, decrease in use of IOP-lowering medications and post operative complication rates. Phacoemulsification alone had a lower success rate and greater need for postoperative IOP-lowering medications compared to trabeculectomy alone or phacotrabeculectomy. Phacoemulsification alone may be a reasonable option for patients with visually significant cataract and lower baseline IOP. How to cite this article: Jung JL, Isida-Llerandi CG, Lazcano-Gomez G, SooHoo JR, Kahook MY. Intraocular Pressure Control after Trabeculectomy, Phacotrabeculectomy and Phaco-emulsification in a Hispanic Population. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2014;8(2):67-74.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4741170
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47411702016-03-18 Intraocular Pressure Control after Trabeculectomy, Phacotrabeculectomy and Phacoemulsification in a Hispanic Population L Jung, Jennifer Isida-Llerandi, Cristina G Lazcano-Gomez, Gabriel SooHoo, Jeffrey R Kahook, Malik Y J Curr Glaucoma Pract Original Research Purpose: To compare the efficacy of different surgical strategies for intraocular pressure (IOP) control in Hispanic glaucoma patients with and without visually significant cataracts. Design: Comparative retrospective consecutive case series. Methods: The charts of 153 consecutive patients with primary open angle glaucoma who underwent either trabeculectomy alone (n = 51), phacotrabeculectomy (n = 51), or phacoemulsification alone (n = 51) were reviewed to compare IOP control, the number of glaucoma medications required postoperatively, and the inci dence of surgical complications. Results: Preoperative IOP was 17.5 ± 5.2 mm Hg in the trabe-culectomy group, 15.4 ± 4.5 mm Hg in the phacotrabeculectomy group and 13.9 ± 2.9 mm Hg in the phacoemulsification group (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Mean IOP reduction from baseline was 4.2 ± 6.9 (24.6%) for the trabeculectomy group, 2.9 ± 5.0 (20.8%) for the phacotrabeculectomy group, and 0.9 ± 3.4 (6.5%) for the phacoemulsification group (p = 0.009). The number of IOP-lowering medications required postoperatively decreased significantly in all three groups (p = 0.001). The rate of early and late postoperative complications was similar between the trabeculectomy and phacotrabeculectomy groups and less for the phacoemulsification group. Conclusion: Trabeculectomy and phacotrabeculectomy are both viable surgical options for managing open angle glau coma. Both resulted in similar rates of success, IOP reduction, decrease in use of IOP-lowering medications and post operative complication rates. Phacoemulsification alone had a lower success rate and greater need for postoperative IOP-lowering medications compared to trabeculectomy alone or phacotrabeculectomy. Phacoemulsification alone may be a reasonable option for patients with visually significant cataract and lower baseline IOP. How to cite this article: Jung JL, Isida-Llerandi CG, Lazcano-Gomez G, SooHoo JR, Kahook MY. Intraocular Pressure Control after Trabeculectomy, Phacotrabeculectomy and Phaco-emulsification in a Hispanic Population. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2014;8(2):67-74. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2014 2014-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4741170/ /pubmed/26997812 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10008-1164 Text en Copyright © 2014; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
spellingShingle Original Research
L Jung, Jennifer
Isida-Llerandi, Cristina G
Lazcano-Gomez, Gabriel
SooHoo, Jeffrey R
Kahook, Malik Y
Intraocular Pressure Control after Trabeculectomy, Phacotrabeculectomy and Phacoemulsification in a Hispanic Population
title Intraocular Pressure Control after Trabeculectomy, Phacotrabeculectomy and Phacoemulsification in a Hispanic Population
title_full Intraocular Pressure Control after Trabeculectomy, Phacotrabeculectomy and Phacoemulsification in a Hispanic Population
title_fullStr Intraocular Pressure Control after Trabeculectomy, Phacotrabeculectomy and Phacoemulsification in a Hispanic Population
title_full_unstemmed Intraocular Pressure Control after Trabeculectomy, Phacotrabeculectomy and Phacoemulsification in a Hispanic Population
title_short Intraocular Pressure Control after Trabeculectomy, Phacotrabeculectomy and Phacoemulsification in a Hispanic Population
title_sort intraocular pressure control after trabeculectomy, phacotrabeculectomy and phacoemulsification in a hispanic population
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4741170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26997812
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10008-1164
work_keys_str_mv AT ljungjennifer intraocularpressurecontrolaftertrabeculectomyphacotrabeculectomyandphacoemulsificationinahispanicpopulation
AT isidallerandicristinag intraocularpressurecontrolaftertrabeculectomyphacotrabeculectomyandphacoemulsificationinahispanicpopulation
AT lazcanogomezgabriel intraocularpressurecontrolaftertrabeculectomyphacotrabeculectomyandphacoemulsificationinahispanicpopulation
AT soohoojeffreyr intraocularpressurecontrolaftertrabeculectomyphacotrabeculectomyandphacoemulsificationinahispanicpopulation
AT kahookmaliky intraocularpressurecontrolaftertrabeculectomyphacotrabeculectomyandphacoemulsificationinahispanicpopulation