Cargando…
A Randomized Clinical Trial of Single-Dose Versus Weekly Dalbavancin for Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infection
Background. Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) are a cause of significant morbidity and therapy can be a burden to the healthcare system. New antibiotics that simplify treatment and avoid hospitalization are needed. This study compared the safety and efficacy of a single in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4741365/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26611777 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/civ982 |
_version_ | 1782413978521042944 |
---|---|
author | Dunne, Michael W. Puttagunta, Sailaja Giordano, Philip Krievins, Dainis Zelasky, Michael Baldassarre, James |
author_facet | Dunne, Michael W. Puttagunta, Sailaja Giordano, Philip Krievins, Dainis Zelasky, Michael Baldassarre, James |
author_sort | Dunne, Michael W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) are a cause of significant morbidity and therapy can be a burden to the healthcare system. New antibiotics that simplify treatment and avoid hospitalization are needed. This study compared the safety and efficacy of a single intravenous infusion of 1500 mg of dalbavancin to the 2-dose regimen. Methods. This study was a randomized, double-blind trial in patients aged >18 years with ABSSSIs. Patients were randomized to dalbavancin 1500 mg either as a single intravenous (IV) infusion or 1000 mg IV on day 1 followed 1 week later by 500 mg IV. The primary endpoint was a ≥20% reduction in the area of erythema at 48–72 hours in the intent-to-treat population. Noninferiority was to be declared if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) on the difference in the outcomes was greater than −10%. Clinical outcome was also assessed at days 14 and 28. Results. Six hundred ninety-eight patients were randomized. Demographic characteristics were similar on each regimen, although there were more patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) at baseline on the 2-dose regimen (36/210 [17.1%] vs 61/220 [27.7%]). Dalbavancin delivered as a single dose was noninferior to a 2-dose regimen (81.4% vs 84.2%; difference, −2.9% [95% CI, −8.5% to 2.8%]). Clinical outcomes were also similar at day 14 (84.0% vs 84.8%), day 28 (84.5% vs 85.1%), and day 14 in clinically evaluable patients with MRSA in a baseline culture (92.9% vs 95.3%) in the single- and 2-dose regimens, respectively. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 20.1% of the single-dose patients and 19.9% on the 2-dose regimen. Conclusions. A single 1500-mg infusion of dalbavancin is noninferior to a 2-dose regimen, has a similar safety profile, and removes logistical constraints related to delivery of the second dose. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT02127970. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4741365 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47413652016-02-05 A Randomized Clinical Trial of Single-Dose Versus Weekly Dalbavancin for Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infection Dunne, Michael W. Puttagunta, Sailaja Giordano, Philip Krievins, Dainis Zelasky, Michael Baldassarre, James Clin Infect Dis Articles and Commentaries Background. Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) are a cause of significant morbidity and therapy can be a burden to the healthcare system. New antibiotics that simplify treatment and avoid hospitalization are needed. This study compared the safety and efficacy of a single intravenous infusion of 1500 mg of dalbavancin to the 2-dose regimen. Methods. This study was a randomized, double-blind trial in patients aged >18 years with ABSSSIs. Patients were randomized to dalbavancin 1500 mg either as a single intravenous (IV) infusion or 1000 mg IV on day 1 followed 1 week later by 500 mg IV. The primary endpoint was a ≥20% reduction in the area of erythema at 48–72 hours in the intent-to-treat population. Noninferiority was to be declared if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) on the difference in the outcomes was greater than −10%. Clinical outcome was also assessed at days 14 and 28. Results. Six hundred ninety-eight patients were randomized. Demographic characteristics were similar on each regimen, although there were more patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) at baseline on the 2-dose regimen (36/210 [17.1%] vs 61/220 [27.7%]). Dalbavancin delivered as a single dose was noninferior to a 2-dose regimen (81.4% vs 84.2%; difference, −2.9% [95% CI, −8.5% to 2.8%]). Clinical outcomes were also similar at day 14 (84.0% vs 84.8%), day 28 (84.5% vs 85.1%), and day 14 in clinically evaluable patients with MRSA in a baseline culture (92.9% vs 95.3%) in the single- and 2-dose regimens, respectively. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 20.1% of the single-dose patients and 19.9% on the 2-dose regimen. Conclusions. A single 1500-mg infusion of dalbavancin is noninferior to a 2-dose regimen, has a similar safety profile, and removes logistical constraints related to delivery of the second dose. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT02127970. Oxford University Press 2016-03-01 2015-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4741365/ /pubmed/26611777 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/civ982 Text en © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, contact journals.permissions@oup.com. |
spellingShingle | Articles and Commentaries Dunne, Michael W. Puttagunta, Sailaja Giordano, Philip Krievins, Dainis Zelasky, Michael Baldassarre, James A Randomized Clinical Trial of Single-Dose Versus Weekly Dalbavancin for Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infection |
title | A Randomized Clinical Trial of Single-Dose Versus Weekly Dalbavancin for Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infection |
title_full | A Randomized Clinical Trial of Single-Dose Versus Weekly Dalbavancin for Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infection |
title_fullStr | A Randomized Clinical Trial of Single-Dose Versus Weekly Dalbavancin for Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infection |
title_full_unstemmed | A Randomized Clinical Trial of Single-Dose Versus Weekly Dalbavancin for Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infection |
title_short | A Randomized Clinical Trial of Single-Dose Versus Weekly Dalbavancin for Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infection |
title_sort | randomized clinical trial of single-dose versus weekly dalbavancin for treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection |
topic | Articles and Commentaries |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4741365/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26611777 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/civ982 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dunnemichaelw arandomizedclinicaltrialofsingledoseversusweeklydalbavancinfortreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfection AT puttaguntasailaja arandomizedclinicaltrialofsingledoseversusweeklydalbavancinfortreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfection AT giordanophilip arandomizedclinicaltrialofsingledoseversusweeklydalbavancinfortreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfection AT krievinsdainis arandomizedclinicaltrialofsingledoseversusweeklydalbavancinfortreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfection AT zelaskymichael arandomizedclinicaltrialofsingledoseversusweeklydalbavancinfortreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfection AT baldassarrejames arandomizedclinicaltrialofsingledoseversusweeklydalbavancinfortreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfection AT dunnemichaelw randomizedclinicaltrialofsingledoseversusweeklydalbavancinfortreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfection AT puttaguntasailaja randomizedclinicaltrialofsingledoseversusweeklydalbavancinfortreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfection AT giordanophilip randomizedclinicaltrialofsingledoseversusweeklydalbavancinfortreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfection AT krievinsdainis randomizedclinicaltrialofsingledoseversusweeklydalbavancinfortreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfection AT zelaskymichael randomizedclinicaltrialofsingledoseversusweeklydalbavancinfortreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfection AT baldassarrejames randomizedclinicaltrialofsingledoseversusweeklydalbavancinfortreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfection |