Cargando…

A Randomized Clinical Trial of Single-Dose Versus Weekly Dalbavancin for Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infection

Background. Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) are a cause of significant morbidity and therapy can be a burden to the healthcare system. New antibiotics that simplify treatment and avoid hospitalization are needed. This study compared the safety and efficacy of a single in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dunne, Michael W., Puttagunta, Sailaja, Giordano, Philip, Krievins, Dainis, Zelasky, Michael, Baldassarre, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4741365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26611777
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/civ982
_version_ 1782413978521042944
author Dunne, Michael W.
Puttagunta, Sailaja
Giordano, Philip
Krievins, Dainis
Zelasky, Michael
Baldassarre, James
author_facet Dunne, Michael W.
Puttagunta, Sailaja
Giordano, Philip
Krievins, Dainis
Zelasky, Michael
Baldassarre, James
author_sort Dunne, Michael W.
collection PubMed
description Background. Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) are a cause of significant morbidity and therapy can be a burden to the healthcare system. New antibiotics that simplify treatment and avoid hospitalization are needed. This study compared the safety and efficacy of a single intravenous infusion of 1500 mg of dalbavancin to the 2-dose regimen. Methods. This study was a randomized, double-blind trial in patients aged >18 years with ABSSSIs. Patients were randomized to dalbavancin 1500 mg either as a single intravenous (IV) infusion or 1000 mg IV on day 1 followed 1 week later by 500 mg IV. The primary endpoint was a ≥20% reduction in the area of erythema at 48–72 hours in the intent-to-treat population. Noninferiority was to be declared if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) on the difference in the outcomes was greater than −10%. Clinical outcome was also assessed at days 14 and 28. Results. Six hundred ninety-eight patients were randomized. Demographic characteristics were similar on each regimen, although there were more patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) at baseline on the 2-dose regimen (36/210 [17.1%] vs 61/220 [27.7%]). Dalbavancin delivered as a single dose was noninferior to a 2-dose regimen (81.4% vs 84.2%; difference, −2.9% [95% CI, −8.5% to 2.8%]). Clinical outcomes were also similar at day 14 (84.0% vs 84.8%), day 28 (84.5% vs 85.1%), and day 14 in clinically evaluable patients with MRSA in a baseline culture (92.9% vs 95.3%) in the single- and 2-dose regimens, respectively. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 20.1% of the single-dose patients and 19.9% on the 2-dose regimen. Conclusions. A single 1500-mg infusion of dalbavancin is noninferior to a 2-dose regimen, has a similar safety profile, and removes logistical constraints related to delivery of the second dose. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT02127970.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4741365
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47413652016-02-05 A Randomized Clinical Trial of Single-Dose Versus Weekly Dalbavancin for Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infection Dunne, Michael W. Puttagunta, Sailaja Giordano, Philip Krievins, Dainis Zelasky, Michael Baldassarre, James Clin Infect Dis Articles and Commentaries Background. Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) are a cause of significant morbidity and therapy can be a burden to the healthcare system. New antibiotics that simplify treatment and avoid hospitalization are needed. This study compared the safety and efficacy of a single intravenous infusion of 1500 mg of dalbavancin to the 2-dose regimen. Methods. This study was a randomized, double-blind trial in patients aged >18 years with ABSSSIs. Patients were randomized to dalbavancin 1500 mg either as a single intravenous (IV) infusion or 1000 mg IV on day 1 followed 1 week later by 500 mg IV. The primary endpoint was a ≥20% reduction in the area of erythema at 48–72 hours in the intent-to-treat population. Noninferiority was to be declared if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) on the difference in the outcomes was greater than −10%. Clinical outcome was also assessed at days 14 and 28. Results. Six hundred ninety-eight patients were randomized. Demographic characteristics were similar on each regimen, although there were more patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) at baseline on the 2-dose regimen (36/210 [17.1%] vs 61/220 [27.7%]). Dalbavancin delivered as a single dose was noninferior to a 2-dose regimen (81.4% vs 84.2%; difference, −2.9% [95% CI, −8.5% to 2.8%]). Clinical outcomes were also similar at day 14 (84.0% vs 84.8%), day 28 (84.5% vs 85.1%), and day 14 in clinically evaluable patients with MRSA in a baseline culture (92.9% vs 95.3%) in the single- and 2-dose regimens, respectively. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 20.1% of the single-dose patients and 19.9% on the 2-dose regimen. Conclusions. A single 1500-mg infusion of dalbavancin is noninferior to a 2-dose regimen, has a similar safety profile, and removes logistical constraints related to delivery of the second dose. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT02127970. Oxford University Press 2016-03-01 2015-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4741365/ /pubmed/26611777 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/civ982 Text en © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, contact journals.permissions@oup.com.
spellingShingle Articles and Commentaries
Dunne, Michael W.
Puttagunta, Sailaja
Giordano, Philip
Krievins, Dainis
Zelasky, Michael
Baldassarre, James
A Randomized Clinical Trial of Single-Dose Versus Weekly Dalbavancin for Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infection
title A Randomized Clinical Trial of Single-Dose Versus Weekly Dalbavancin for Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infection
title_full A Randomized Clinical Trial of Single-Dose Versus Weekly Dalbavancin for Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infection
title_fullStr A Randomized Clinical Trial of Single-Dose Versus Weekly Dalbavancin for Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infection
title_full_unstemmed A Randomized Clinical Trial of Single-Dose Versus Weekly Dalbavancin for Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infection
title_short A Randomized Clinical Trial of Single-Dose Versus Weekly Dalbavancin for Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infection
title_sort randomized clinical trial of single-dose versus weekly dalbavancin for treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection
topic Articles and Commentaries
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4741365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26611777
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/civ982
work_keys_str_mv AT dunnemichaelw arandomizedclinicaltrialofsingledoseversusweeklydalbavancinfortreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfection
AT puttaguntasailaja arandomizedclinicaltrialofsingledoseversusweeklydalbavancinfortreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfection
AT giordanophilip arandomizedclinicaltrialofsingledoseversusweeklydalbavancinfortreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfection
AT krievinsdainis arandomizedclinicaltrialofsingledoseversusweeklydalbavancinfortreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfection
AT zelaskymichael arandomizedclinicaltrialofsingledoseversusweeklydalbavancinfortreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfection
AT baldassarrejames arandomizedclinicaltrialofsingledoseversusweeklydalbavancinfortreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfection
AT dunnemichaelw randomizedclinicaltrialofsingledoseversusweeklydalbavancinfortreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfection
AT puttaguntasailaja randomizedclinicaltrialofsingledoseversusweeklydalbavancinfortreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfection
AT giordanophilip randomizedclinicaltrialofsingledoseversusweeklydalbavancinfortreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfection
AT krievinsdainis randomizedclinicaltrialofsingledoseversusweeklydalbavancinfortreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfection
AT zelaskymichael randomizedclinicaltrialofsingledoseversusweeklydalbavancinfortreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfection
AT baldassarrejames randomizedclinicaltrialofsingledoseversusweeklydalbavancinfortreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfection