Cargando…

Exploring the Ecological Validity of Thinking on Demand: Neural Correlates of Elicited vs. Spontaneously Occurring Inner Speech

Psychology and cognitive neuroscience often use standardized tasks to elicit particular experiences. We explore whether elicited experiences are similar to spontaneous experiences. In an MRI scanner, five participants performed tasks designed to elicit inner speech (covertly repeating experimenter-s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hurlburt, Russell T., Alderson-Day, Ben, Kühn, Simone, Fernyhough, Charles
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4741522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26845028
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147932
_version_ 1782414010267729920
author Hurlburt, Russell T.
Alderson-Day, Ben
Kühn, Simone
Fernyhough, Charles
author_facet Hurlburt, Russell T.
Alderson-Day, Ben
Kühn, Simone
Fernyhough, Charles
author_sort Hurlburt, Russell T.
collection PubMed
description Psychology and cognitive neuroscience often use standardized tasks to elicit particular experiences. We explore whether elicited experiences are similar to spontaneous experiences. In an MRI scanner, five participants performed tasks designed to elicit inner speech (covertly repeating experimenter-supplied words), inner seeing, inner hearing, feeling, and sensing. Then, in their natural environments, participants were trained in four days of random-beep-triggered Descriptive Experience Sampling (DES). They subsequently returned to the scanner for nine 25-min resting-state sessions; during each they received four DES beeps and described those moments (9 × 4 = 36 moments per participant) of spontaneously occurring experience. Enough of those moments included spontaneous inner speech to allow us to compare brain activation during spontaneous inner speech with what we had found in task-elicited inner speech. ROI analysis was used to compare activation in two relevant areas (Heschl’s gyrus and left inferior frontal gyrus). Task-elicited inner speech was associated with decreased activation in Heschl’s gyrus and increased activation in left inferior frontal gyrus. However, spontaneous inner speech had the opposite effect in Heschl’s gyrus and no significant effect in left inferior frontal gyrus. This study demonstrates how spontaneous phenomena can be investigated in MRI and calls into question the assumption that task-created phenomena are often neurophysiologically and psychologically similar to spontaneously occurring phenomena.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4741522
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47415222016-02-11 Exploring the Ecological Validity of Thinking on Demand: Neural Correlates of Elicited vs. Spontaneously Occurring Inner Speech Hurlburt, Russell T. Alderson-Day, Ben Kühn, Simone Fernyhough, Charles PLoS One Research Article Psychology and cognitive neuroscience often use standardized tasks to elicit particular experiences. We explore whether elicited experiences are similar to spontaneous experiences. In an MRI scanner, five participants performed tasks designed to elicit inner speech (covertly repeating experimenter-supplied words), inner seeing, inner hearing, feeling, and sensing. Then, in their natural environments, participants were trained in four days of random-beep-triggered Descriptive Experience Sampling (DES). They subsequently returned to the scanner for nine 25-min resting-state sessions; during each they received four DES beeps and described those moments (9 × 4 = 36 moments per participant) of spontaneously occurring experience. Enough of those moments included spontaneous inner speech to allow us to compare brain activation during spontaneous inner speech with what we had found in task-elicited inner speech. ROI analysis was used to compare activation in two relevant areas (Heschl’s gyrus and left inferior frontal gyrus). Task-elicited inner speech was associated with decreased activation in Heschl’s gyrus and increased activation in left inferior frontal gyrus. However, spontaneous inner speech had the opposite effect in Heschl’s gyrus and no significant effect in left inferior frontal gyrus. This study demonstrates how spontaneous phenomena can be investigated in MRI and calls into question the assumption that task-created phenomena are often neurophysiologically and psychologically similar to spontaneously occurring phenomena. Public Library of Science 2016-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4741522/ /pubmed/26845028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147932 Text en © 2016 Hurlburt et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hurlburt, Russell T.
Alderson-Day, Ben
Kühn, Simone
Fernyhough, Charles
Exploring the Ecological Validity of Thinking on Demand: Neural Correlates of Elicited vs. Spontaneously Occurring Inner Speech
title Exploring the Ecological Validity of Thinking on Demand: Neural Correlates of Elicited vs. Spontaneously Occurring Inner Speech
title_full Exploring the Ecological Validity of Thinking on Demand: Neural Correlates of Elicited vs. Spontaneously Occurring Inner Speech
title_fullStr Exploring the Ecological Validity of Thinking on Demand: Neural Correlates of Elicited vs. Spontaneously Occurring Inner Speech
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the Ecological Validity of Thinking on Demand: Neural Correlates of Elicited vs. Spontaneously Occurring Inner Speech
title_short Exploring the Ecological Validity of Thinking on Demand: Neural Correlates of Elicited vs. Spontaneously Occurring Inner Speech
title_sort exploring the ecological validity of thinking on demand: neural correlates of elicited vs. spontaneously occurring inner speech
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4741522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26845028
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147932
work_keys_str_mv AT hurlburtrussellt exploringtheecologicalvalidityofthinkingondemandneuralcorrelatesofelicitedvsspontaneouslyoccurringinnerspeech
AT aldersondayben exploringtheecologicalvalidityofthinkingondemandneuralcorrelatesofelicitedvsspontaneouslyoccurringinnerspeech
AT kuhnsimone exploringtheecologicalvalidityofthinkingondemandneuralcorrelatesofelicitedvsspontaneouslyoccurringinnerspeech
AT fernyhoughcharles exploringtheecologicalvalidityofthinkingondemandneuralcorrelatesofelicitedvsspontaneouslyoccurringinnerspeech