Cargando…

Phase II study of docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil in patients with distantly metastatic penile cancer as first-line chemotherapy

PURPOSE: Patients with distantly metastatic (M1) penile squamous carcinoma have extremely poor prognosis and few prospective clinical trials evaluating systemic treatment have ever been performed for this population. METHODS: Patients (aged ≥ 18 years) with histologically confirmed, distantly metast...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Sheng, Zhu, Yao, Ye, Dingwei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4741671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26311739
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: Patients with distantly metastatic (M1) penile squamous carcinoma have extremely poor prognosis and few prospective clinical trials evaluating systemic treatment have ever been performed for this population. METHODS: Patients (aged ≥ 18 years) with histologically confirmed, distantly metastatic, measurable penile squamous carcinoma were enrolled. They were treated with docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) (day1), cisplatin 70 mg/m(2) (day1), and fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2)/d (days 1 to 5) every 3 weeks as first line chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS: 39 patients received chemotherapy with a median of four cycles (range two to six). The median follow-up time was 11 months. 15 patients had a confirmed objective response (38.5%, 95% CI 23.36–55.38), all of which were partial responses. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3 months (95% CI 2.92–3.09), and the median overall survival (OS) was 7 months (95% CI 5.99–8.03). Toxicity was manageable and the most frequently recorded adverse events of grade 3 or higher were neutropenia (13 of 39; 33%), nausea/vomiting (7 of 39;18%). There was no treatment-related death. CONCLUSION: The palliative regimen of docetaxel, fluorouracil, and cisplatin induced moderate responses and can be used as a choice for the treatment of patients with distantly metastatic penile cancer. However, efforts to improve efficacy and minimize toxicity for this regimen should be made in the future.