Cargando…
Predictive factors for biochemical recurrence in radical prostatectomy patients
INTRODUCTION: Radical prostatectomy (RP) is considered the best treatment for the management of localized prostate cancer in patients with life expectancy over 10 years. However, a complete recovery is not guaranteed for all patients who received/underwent RP treatment. Biochemical recurrence is fre...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Polish Urological Association
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4742437/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26855791 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2015.606 |
_version_ | 1782414189417988096 |
---|---|
author | Turk, Hakan Celik, Orcun Un, Sitki Yoldas, Mehmet İsoglu, Cemal Selcuk Karabicak, Mustafa Ergani, Batuhan Koc, Gokhan Zorlu, Ferruh Ilbey, Yusuf Ozlem |
author_facet | Turk, Hakan Celik, Orcun Un, Sitki Yoldas, Mehmet İsoglu, Cemal Selcuk Karabicak, Mustafa Ergani, Batuhan Koc, Gokhan Zorlu, Ferruh Ilbey, Yusuf Ozlem |
author_sort | Turk, Hakan |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Radical prostatectomy (RP) is considered the best treatment for the management of localized prostate cancer in patients with life expectancy over 10 years. However, a complete recovery is not guaranteed for all patients who received/underwent RP treatment. Biochemical recurrence is frequently observed during the post-operative follow-up period. The main objective in this study is to evaluate the predictive factors of biochemical recurrence in localized prostate cancer patients who underwent RP surgery MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 352 patients with prostate cancer treated by RP at a single institution between February 2004 and June 2014. Detailed pathological and follow-up data of all patients were obtained and analyzed to determine the results. RESULTS: Mean follow-up duration was 39.7 months. 83 patients (23%) experienced biochemical recurrence (BCR) during the follow-up period. Mean BCR duration range was 6.56 (1–41) months. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, Gleason score (GS), PSA and extra-capsular tumour spread (ECS) variables were found to be statistically significant as BCR predictive factors. CONCLUSIONS: According to our study results, it is thought that PSA, GS and ECS can all be used for guidance in choosing a treatment modality for post-RP biochemical recurrence and metastatic disease as predictive factors. However, there is no consensus in this matter and it is still debated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4742437 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Polish Urological Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47424372016-02-05 Predictive factors for biochemical recurrence in radical prostatectomy patients Turk, Hakan Celik, Orcun Un, Sitki Yoldas, Mehmet İsoglu, Cemal Selcuk Karabicak, Mustafa Ergani, Batuhan Koc, Gokhan Zorlu, Ferruh Ilbey, Yusuf Ozlem Cent European J Urol Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Radical prostatectomy (RP) is considered the best treatment for the management of localized prostate cancer in patients with life expectancy over 10 years. However, a complete recovery is not guaranteed for all patients who received/underwent RP treatment. Biochemical recurrence is frequently observed during the post-operative follow-up period. The main objective in this study is to evaluate the predictive factors of biochemical recurrence in localized prostate cancer patients who underwent RP surgery MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 352 patients with prostate cancer treated by RP at a single institution between February 2004 and June 2014. Detailed pathological and follow-up data of all patients were obtained and analyzed to determine the results. RESULTS: Mean follow-up duration was 39.7 months. 83 patients (23%) experienced biochemical recurrence (BCR) during the follow-up period. Mean BCR duration range was 6.56 (1–41) months. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, Gleason score (GS), PSA and extra-capsular tumour spread (ECS) variables were found to be statistically significant as BCR predictive factors. CONCLUSIONS: According to our study results, it is thought that PSA, GS and ECS can all be used for guidance in choosing a treatment modality for post-RP biochemical recurrence and metastatic disease as predictive factors. However, there is no consensus in this matter and it is still debated. Polish Urological Association 2015-11-30 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4742437/ /pubmed/26855791 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2015.606 Text en Copyright by Polish Urological Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Turk, Hakan Celik, Orcun Un, Sitki Yoldas, Mehmet İsoglu, Cemal Selcuk Karabicak, Mustafa Ergani, Batuhan Koc, Gokhan Zorlu, Ferruh Ilbey, Yusuf Ozlem Predictive factors for biochemical recurrence in radical prostatectomy patients |
title | Predictive factors for biochemical recurrence in radical prostatectomy patients |
title_full | Predictive factors for biochemical recurrence in radical prostatectomy patients |
title_fullStr | Predictive factors for biochemical recurrence in radical prostatectomy patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Predictive factors for biochemical recurrence in radical prostatectomy patients |
title_short | Predictive factors for biochemical recurrence in radical prostatectomy patients |
title_sort | predictive factors for biochemical recurrence in radical prostatectomy patients |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4742437/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26855791 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2015.606 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT turkhakan predictivefactorsforbiochemicalrecurrenceinradicalprostatectomypatients AT celikorcun predictivefactorsforbiochemicalrecurrenceinradicalprostatectomypatients AT unsitki predictivefactorsforbiochemicalrecurrenceinradicalprostatectomypatients AT yoldasmehmet predictivefactorsforbiochemicalrecurrenceinradicalprostatectomypatients AT isoglucemalselcuk predictivefactorsforbiochemicalrecurrenceinradicalprostatectomypatients AT karabicakmustafa predictivefactorsforbiochemicalrecurrenceinradicalprostatectomypatients AT erganibatuhan predictivefactorsforbiochemicalrecurrenceinradicalprostatectomypatients AT kocgokhan predictivefactorsforbiochemicalrecurrenceinradicalprostatectomypatients AT zorluferruh predictivefactorsforbiochemicalrecurrenceinradicalprostatectomypatients AT ilbeyyusufozlem predictivefactorsforbiochemicalrecurrenceinradicalprostatectomypatients |