Cargando…
Continued misinterpretation of confidence intervals: response to Miller and Ulrich
Miller and Ulrich (2015) critique our claim (Hoekstra et al., Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(5), 1157–1164, 2014), based on a survey given to researchers and students, of widespread misunderstanding of confidence intervals (CIs). They suggest that survey respondents may have interpreted the s...
Autores principales: | Morey, Richard D., Hoekstra, Rink, Rouder, Jeffrey N., Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4742490/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26620955 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0955-8 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The fallacy of placing confidence in confidence intervals
por: Morey, Richard D., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations
por: Greenland, Sander, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
P-Value, Confidence Intervals, and Statistical Inference: A New Dataset of Misinterpretation
por: Lyu, Ziyang, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Ulrich's international periodicals directory
por: Collective
Publicado: (1987) -
Conversaciones con Hans Ulrich Obrist /
por: Koolhaas, Rem
Publicado: (2009)