Cargando…

Prognostic interaction between ASXL1 and TET2 mutations in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia

Mutations involving epigenetic regulators (TET2~60% and ASXL1~40%) and splicing components (SRSF2~50%) are frequent in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). On a 27-gene targeted capture panel performed on 175 CMML patients (66% males, median age 70 years), common mutations included: TET2 46%, ASX...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patnaik, M M, Lasho, T L, Vijayvargiya, P, Finke, C M, Hanson, C A, Ketterling, R P, Gangat, N, Tefferi, A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4742630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26771811
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bcj.2015.113
_version_ 1782414228747976704
author Patnaik, M M
Lasho, T L
Vijayvargiya, P
Finke, C M
Hanson, C A
Ketterling, R P
Gangat, N
Tefferi, A
author_facet Patnaik, M M
Lasho, T L
Vijayvargiya, P
Finke, C M
Hanson, C A
Ketterling, R P
Gangat, N
Tefferi, A
author_sort Patnaik, M M
collection PubMed
description Mutations involving epigenetic regulators (TET2~60% and ASXL1~40%) and splicing components (SRSF2~50%) are frequent in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). On a 27-gene targeted capture panel performed on 175 CMML patients (66% males, median age 70 years), common mutations included: TET2 46%, ASXL1 47%, SRSF2 45% and SETBP1 19%. A total of 172 (98%) patients had at least one mutation, 21 (12%) had 2, 24 (14%) had 3 and 30 (17%) had >3 mutations. In a univariate analysis, the presence of ASXL1 mutations (P=0.02) and the absence of TET2 mutations (P=0.03), adversely impacted survival; while the number of concurrent mutations had no impact (P=0.3). In a multivariable analysis that included hemoglobin, platelet count, absolute monocyte count and circulating immature myeloid cells (Mayo model), the presence of ASXL1 mutations (P=0.01) and absence of TET2 mutations (P=0.003) retained prognostic significance. Patients were stratified into four categories: ASXL1wt/TET2wt (n=56), ASXL1mut/TET2wt (n=31), ASXL1mut/TET2mut (n=50) and ASXL1wt/TET2mut (n=38). Survival data demonstrated a significant difference in favor of ASXL1wt/TET2mut (38 months; P=0.016), compared with those with ASXL1wt/TET2wt (19 months), ASXL1mut/TET2wt (21 months) and ASXL1mut/TET2mut (16 months) (P=0.3). We confirm the negative prognostic impact imparted by ASXL1 mutations and suggest a favorable impact from TET2 mutations in the absence of ASXL1 mutations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4742630
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47426302016-02-22 Prognostic interaction between ASXL1 and TET2 mutations in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia Patnaik, M M Lasho, T L Vijayvargiya, P Finke, C M Hanson, C A Ketterling, R P Gangat, N Tefferi, A Blood Cancer J Original Article Mutations involving epigenetic regulators (TET2~60% and ASXL1~40%) and splicing components (SRSF2~50%) are frequent in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). On a 27-gene targeted capture panel performed on 175 CMML patients (66% males, median age 70 years), common mutations included: TET2 46%, ASXL1 47%, SRSF2 45% and SETBP1 19%. A total of 172 (98%) patients had at least one mutation, 21 (12%) had 2, 24 (14%) had 3 and 30 (17%) had >3 mutations. In a univariate analysis, the presence of ASXL1 mutations (P=0.02) and the absence of TET2 mutations (P=0.03), adversely impacted survival; while the number of concurrent mutations had no impact (P=0.3). In a multivariable analysis that included hemoglobin, platelet count, absolute monocyte count and circulating immature myeloid cells (Mayo model), the presence of ASXL1 mutations (P=0.01) and absence of TET2 mutations (P=0.003) retained prognostic significance. Patients were stratified into four categories: ASXL1wt/TET2wt (n=56), ASXL1mut/TET2wt (n=31), ASXL1mut/TET2mut (n=50) and ASXL1wt/TET2mut (n=38). Survival data demonstrated a significant difference in favor of ASXL1wt/TET2mut (38 months; P=0.016), compared with those with ASXL1wt/TET2wt (19 months), ASXL1mut/TET2wt (21 months) and ASXL1mut/TET2mut (16 months) (P=0.3). We confirm the negative prognostic impact imparted by ASXL1 mutations and suggest a favorable impact from TET2 mutations in the absence of ASXL1 mutations. Nature Publishing Group 2016-01 2016-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4742630/ /pubmed/26771811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bcj.2015.113 Text en Copyright © 2016 Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Patnaik, M M
Lasho, T L
Vijayvargiya, P
Finke, C M
Hanson, C A
Ketterling, R P
Gangat, N
Tefferi, A
Prognostic interaction between ASXL1 and TET2 mutations in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia
title Prognostic interaction between ASXL1 and TET2 mutations in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia
title_full Prognostic interaction between ASXL1 and TET2 mutations in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia
title_fullStr Prognostic interaction between ASXL1 and TET2 mutations in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic interaction between ASXL1 and TET2 mutations in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia
title_short Prognostic interaction between ASXL1 and TET2 mutations in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia
title_sort prognostic interaction between asxl1 and tet2 mutations in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4742630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26771811
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bcj.2015.113
work_keys_str_mv AT patnaikmm prognosticinteractionbetweenasxl1andtet2mutationsinchronicmyelomonocyticleukemia
AT lashotl prognosticinteractionbetweenasxl1andtet2mutationsinchronicmyelomonocyticleukemia
AT vijayvargiyap prognosticinteractionbetweenasxl1andtet2mutationsinchronicmyelomonocyticleukemia
AT finkecm prognosticinteractionbetweenasxl1andtet2mutationsinchronicmyelomonocyticleukemia
AT hansonca prognosticinteractionbetweenasxl1andtet2mutationsinchronicmyelomonocyticleukemia
AT ketterlingrp prognosticinteractionbetweenasxl1andtet2mutationsinchronicmyelomonocyticleukemia
AT gangatn prognosticinteractionbetweenasxl1andtet2mutationsinchronicmyelomonocyticleukemia
AT tefferia prognosticinteractionbetweenasxl1andtet2mutationsinchronicmyelomonocyticleukemia