Cargando…
Prognostic interaction between ASXL1 and TET2 mutations in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia
Mutations involving epigenetic regulators (TET2~60% and ASXL1~40%) and splicing components (SRSF2~50%) are frequent in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). On a 27-gene targeted capture panel performed on 175 CMML patients (66% males, median age 70 years), common mutations included: TET2 46%, ASX...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4742630/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26771811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bcj.2015.113 |
_version_ | 1782414228747976704 |
---|---|
author | Patnaik, M M Lasho, T L Vijayvargiya, P Finke, C M Hanson, C A Ketterling, R P Gangat, N Tefferi, A |
author_facet | Patnaik, M M Lasho, T L Vijayvargiya, P Finke, C M Hanson, C A Ketterling, R P Gangat, N Tefferi, A |
author_sort | Patnaik, M M |
collection | PubMed |
description | Mutations involving epigenetic regulators (TET2~60% and ASXL1~40%) and splicing components (SRSF2~50%) are frequent in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). On a 27-gene targeted capture panel performed on 175 CMML patients (66% males, median age 70 years), common mutations included: TET2 46%, ASXL1 47%, SRSF2 45% and SETBP1 19%. A total of 172 (98%) patients had at least one mutation, 21 (12%) had 2, 24 (14%) had 3 and 30 (17%) had >3 mutations. In a univariate analysis, the presence of ASXL1 mutations (P=0.02) and the absence of TET2 mutations (P=0.03), adversely impacted survival; while the number of concurrent mutations had no impact (P=0.3). In a multivariable analysis that included hemoglobin, platelet count, absolute monocyte count and circulating immature myeloid cells (Mayo model), the presence of ASXL1 mutations (P=0.01) and absence of TET2 mutations (P=0.003) retained prognostic significance. Patients were stratified into four categories: ASXL1wt/TET2wt (n=56), ASXL1mut/TET2wt (n=31), ASXL1mut/TET2mut (n=50) and ASXL1wt/TET2mut (n=38). Survival data demonstrated a significant difference in favor of ASXL1wt/TET2mut (38 months; P=0.016), compared with those with ASXL1wt/TET2wt (19 months), ASXL1mut/TET2wt (21 months) and ASXL1mut/TET2mut (16 months) (P=0.3). We confirm the negative prognostic impact imparted by ASXL1 mutations and suggest a favorable impact from TET2 mutations in the absence of ASXL1 mutations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4742630 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47426302016-02-22 Prognostic interaction between ASXL1 and TET2 mutations in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia Patnaik, M M Lasho, T L Vijayvargiya, P Finke, C M Hanson, C A Ketterling, R P Gangat, N Tefferi, A Blood Cancer J Original Article Mutations involving epigenetic regulators (TET2~60% and ASXL1~40%) and splicing components (SRSF2~50%) are frequent in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). On a 27-gene targeted capture panel performed on 175 CMML patients (66% males, median age 70 years), common mutations included: TET2 46%, ASXL1 47%, SRSF2 45% and SETBP1 19%. A total of 172 (98%) patients had at least one mutation, 21 (12%) had 2, 24 (14%) had 3 and 30 (17%) had >3 mutations. In a univariate analysis, the presence of ASXL1 mutations (P=0.02) and the absence of TET2 mutations (P=0.03), adversely impacted survival; while the number of concurrent mutations had no impact (P=0.3). In a multivariable analysis that included hemoglobin, platelet count, absolute monocyte count and circulating immature myeloid cells (Mayo model), the presence of ASXL1 mutations (P=0.01) and absence of TET2 mutations (P=0.003) retained prognostic significance. Patients were stratified into four categories: ASXL1wt/TET2wt (n=56), ASXL1mut/TET2wt (n=31), ASXL1mut/TET2mut (n=50) and ASXL1wt/TET2mut (n=38). Survival data demonstrated a significant difference in favor of ASXL1wt/TET2mut (38 months; P=0.016), compared with those with ASXL1wt/TET2wt (19 months), ASXL1mut/TET2wt (21 months) and ASXL1mut/TET2mut (16 months) (P=0.3). We confirm the negative prognostic impact imparted by ASXL1 mutations and suggest a favorable impact from TET2 mutations in the absence of ASXL1 mutations. Nature Publishing Group 2016-01 2016-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4742630/ /pubmed/26771811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bcj.2015.113 Text en Copyright © 2016 Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Article Patnaik, M M Lasho, T L Vijayvargiya, P Finke, C M Hanson, C A Ketterling, R P Gangat, N Tefferi, A Prognostic interaction between ASXL1 and TET2 mutations in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia |
title | Prognostic interaction between ASXL1 and TET2 mutations in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia |
title_full | Prognostic interaction between ASXL1 and TET2 mutations in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia |
title_fullStr | Prognostic interaction between ASXL1 and TET2 mutations in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic interaction between ASXL1 and TET2 mutations in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia |
title_short | Prognostic interaction between ASXL1 and TET2 mutations in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia |
title_sort | prognostic interaction between asxl1 and tet2 mutations in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4742630/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26771811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bcj.2015.113 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT patnaikmm prognosticinteractionbetweenasxl1andtet2mutationsinchronicmyelomonocyticleukemia AT lashotl prognosticinteractionbetweenasxl1andtet2mutationsinchronicmyelomonocyticleukemia AT vijayvargiyap prognosticinteractionbetweenasxl1andtet2mutationsinchronicmyelomonocyticleukemia AT finkecm prognosticinteractionbetweenasxl1andtet2mutationsinchronicmyelomonocyticleukemia AT hansonca prognosticinteractionbetweenasxl1andtet2mutationsinchronicmyelomonocyticleukemia AT ketterlingrp prognosticinteractionbetweenasxl1andtet2mutationsinchronicmyelomonocyticleukemia AT gangatn prognosticinteractionbetweenasxl1andtet2mutationsinchronicmyelomonocyticleukemia AT tefferia prognosticinteractionbetweenasxl1andtet2mutationsinchronicmyelomonocyticleukemia |