Cargando…

Trying to see, failing to focus: near visual impairment in Down syndrome

The majority of individuals with Down syndrome (DS) do not exhibit accurate accommodation, with the aetiology of this deficit unknown. This study examines the mechanism underlying hypoaccommodation in DS by simultaneously investigating the ‘near triad’ – accommodation, vergence and pupillary respons...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doyle, Lesley, Saunders, Kathryn J., Little, Julie-Anne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4742775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26847360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep20444
_version_ 1782414248177041408
author Doyle, Lesley
Saunders, Kathryn J.
Little, Julie-Anne
author_facet Doyle, Lesley
Saunders, Kathryn J.
Little, Julie-Anne
author_sort Doyle, Lesley
collection PubMed
description The majority of individuals with Down syndrome (DS) do not exhibit accurate accommodation, with the aetiology of this deficit unknown. This study examines the mechanism underlying hypoaccommodation in DS by simultaneously investigating the ‘near triad’ – accommodation, vergence and pupillary response. An objective photorefraction system measured accommodation, pupil size and gaze position (vergence) under binocular conditions while participants viewed an animated movie at 50, 33, 25 and 20 cm. Participants were aged 6–16 years (DS = 41, controls = 76). Measures were obtained from 59% of participants with DS and 99% of controls. Accommodative response was significantly less in DS (p < 0.001) and greater accommodative deficits were associated with worsening visual acuity (p = 0.02). Vergence responses were as accurate in DS as in controls (p = 0.90). Habitual pupil diameter did not differ between groups (p = 0.24) but reduced significantly with increasing accommodative demand in both participants with and without DS (p < 0.0001). This study is the first to report simultaneous binocular measurement of the near triad in DS demonstrating that hypoaccommodation is linked to poor visual acuity. Vergence responses were accurate indicating that hypoaccommodation cannot be dismissed as a failure to visually engage with near targets, but rather is a consequence of underlying neurological or physiological deficits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4742775
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47427752016-02-09 Trying to see, failing to focus: near visual impairment in Down syndrome Doyle, Lesley Saunders, Kathryn J. Little, Julie-Anne Sci Rep Article The majority of individuals with Down syndrome (DS) do not exhibit accurate accommodation, with the aetiology of this deficit unknown. This study examines the mechanism underlying hypoaccommodation in DS by simultaneously investigating the ‘near triad’ – accommodation, vergence and pupillary response. An objective photorefraction system measured accommodation, pupil size and gaze position (vergence) under binocular conditions while participants viewed an animated movie at 50, 33, 25 and 20 cm. Participants were aged 6–16 years (DS = 41, controls = 76). Measures were obtained from 59% of participants with DS and 99% of controls. Accommodative response was significantly less in DS (p < 0.001) and greater accommodative deficits were associated with worsening visual acuity (p = 0.02). Vergence responses were as accurate in DS as in controls (p = 0.90). Habitual pupil diameter did not differ between groups (p = 0.24) but reduced significantly with increasing accommodative demand in both participants with and without DS (p < 0.0001). This study is the first to report simultaneous binocular measurement of the near triad in DS demonstrating that hypoaccommodation is linked to poor visual acuity. Vergence responses were accurate indicating that hypoaccommodation cannot be dismissed as a failure to visually engage with near targets, but rather is a consequence of underlying neurological or physiological deficits. Nature Publishing Group 2016-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4742775/ /pubmed/26847360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep20444 Text en Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Doyle, Lesley
Saunders, Kathryn J.
Little, Julie-Anne
Trying to see, failing to focus: near visual impairment in Down syndrome
title Trying to see, failing to focus: near visual impairment in Down syndrome
title_full Trying to see, failing to focus: near visual impairment in Down syndrome
title_fullStr Trying to see, failing to focus: near visual impairment in Down syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Trying to see, failing to focus: near visual impairment in Down syndrome
title_short Trying to see, failing to focus: near visual impairment in Down syndrome
title_sort trying to see, failing to focus: near visual impairment in down syndrome
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4742775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26847360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep20444
work_keys_str_mv AT doylelesley tryingtoseefailingtofocusnearvisualimpairmentindownsyndrome
AT saunderskathrynj tryingtoseefailingtofocusnearvisualimpairmentindownsyndrome
AT littlejulieanne tryingtoseefailingtofocusnearvisualimpairmentindownsyndrome