Cargando…
On the evolving open peer review culture for chemical information science
Compared to the traditional anonymous peer review process, open post-publication peer review provides additional opportunities -and challenges- for reviewers to judge scientific studies. In this editorial, we comment on the open peer review culture and provide some guidance for reviewers of manuscri...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
F1000Research
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4743142/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26913193 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.7460.1 |
_version_ | 1782414306008104960 |
---|---|
author | Walters, W. Patrick Bajorath, Jürgen |
author_facet | Walters, W. Patrick Bajorath, Jürgen |
author_sort | Walters, W. Patrick |
collection | PubMed |
description | Compared to the traditional anonymous peer review process, open post-publication peer review provides additional opportunities -and challenges- for reviewers to judge scientific studies. In this editorial, we comment on the open peer review culture and provide some guidance for reviewers of manuscripts submitted to the Chemical Information Science channel of F1000Research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4743142 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | F1000Research |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47431422016-02-23 On the evolving open peer review culture for chemical information science Walters, W. Patrick Bajorath, Jürgen F1000Res Editorial Compared to the traditional anonymous peer review process, open post-publication peer review provides additional opportunities -and challenges- for reviewers to judge scientific studies. In this editorial, we comment on the open peer review culture and provide some guidance for reviewers of manuscripts submitted to the Chemical Information Science channel of F1000Research. F1000Research 2015-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4743142/ /pubmed/26913193 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.7460.1 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Walters WP and Bajorath J http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Editorial Walters, W. Patrick Bajorath, Jürgen On the evolving open peer review culture for chemical information science |
title | On the evolving open peer review culture for chemical information science |
title_full | On the evolving open peer review culture for chemical information science |
title_fullStr | On the evolving open peer review culture for chemical information science |
title_full_unstemmed | On the evolving open peer review culture for chemical information science |
title_short | On the evolving open peer review culture for chemical information science |
title_sort | on the evolving open peer review culture for chemical information science |
topic | Editorial |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4743142/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26913193 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.7460.1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT walterswpatrick ontheevolvingopenpeerreviewcultureforchemicalinformationscience AT bajorathjurgen ontheevolvingopenpeerreviewcultureforchemicalinformationscience |