Cargando…

Submental island flap reconstruction reduces cost in oral cancer reconstruction compared to radial forearm free flap reconstruction: a case series and cost analysis

BACKGROUND: In Canada, 4,400 cases of oral cancer are diagnosed yearly. Surgical resection is a key component of treatment in many of these cancers. Reconstruction of defects, with the goal of preserving function, is of utmost importance. Several choices are possible for reconstruction of larger def...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Forner, D., Phillips, T., Rigby, M., Hart, R., Taylor, M., Trites, J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4743171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26846792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-016-0124-8
_version_ 1782414311904247808
author Forner, D.
Phillips, T.
Rigby, M.
Hart, R.
Taylor, M.
Trites, J.
author_facet Forner, D.
Phillips, T.
Rigby, M.
Hart, R.
Taylor, M.
Trites, J.
author_sort Forner, D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In Canada, 4,400 cases of oral cancer are diagnosed yearly. Surgical resection is a key component of treatment in many of these cancers. Reconstruction of defects, with the goal of preserving function, is of utmost importance. Several choices are possible for reconstruction of larger defects, including both free and pedicled flaps. Free flap reconstruction is reliable and effective, but requires additional personnel and peri-operative resources. Pedicled flaps remain an important alternative to free flaps, and are less resource intensive. This paper reviews our inaugural experience with the submental island flap (SIF) and compares costs incurred to a matched cohort of oral cancer patients reconstructed with forearm free flaps. METHODS: Charts of patients who underwent SIF and RFFF reconstruction from January 1(st) 2013 to April 1(st) 2015 were retrospectively examined. Associated costs were obtained via online database and previously reported costs at the study institution. RESULTS: Mean length of ICU stay in glossectomy RFFF reconstruction was 4.7 days. Only one patient required ICU stay for one night in the SIF group. Mean length of hospital stay was not significantly different in SIF patients vs RFFF patients (12.4 vs 15.4 days, p > 0.05). Mean operative time was significantly lower in the SIF group compared to the RFFF group (347 vs 552 min, p < 0.05). Total mean intraoperative costs were found to be $4780.59 for RFFF operations, versus $2307.94 for SIF. Total mean cost of post-operative stay was $18158.40 in the SIF group and $43617.60 in the RFFF group. Total cost savings were therefore $27931.85 per patient for the SIF group. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated the use of the submental island flap as an alternative to radial forearm free flaps, showing both decreased hospital costs and comparable patient outcomes. Pedicled flaps are making a resurgence in head and neck reconstruction, and the submental island flap offers an excellent alternative to more labour intensive and costly free flap alternatives.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4743171
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47431712016-02-06 Submental island flap reconstruction reduces cost in oral cancer reconstruction compared to radial forearm free flap reconstruction: a case series and cost analysis Forner, D. Phillips, T. Rigby, M. Hart, R. Taylor, M. Trites, J. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Original Research Article BACKGROUND: In Canada, 4,400 cases of oral cancer are diagnosed yearly. Surgical resection is a key component of treatment in many of these cancers. Reconstruction of defects, with the goal of preserving function, is of utmost importance. Several choices are possible for reconstruction of larger defects, including both free and pedicled flaps. Free flap reconstruction is reliable and effective, but requires additional personnel and peri-operative resources. Pedicled flaps remain an important alternative to free flaps, and are less resource intensive. This paper reviews our inaugural experience with the submental island flap (SIF) and compares costs incurred to a matched cohort of oral cancer patients reconstructed with forearm free flaps. METHODS: Charts of patients who underwent SIF and RFFF reconstruction from January 1(st) 2013 to April 1(st) 2015 were retrospectively examined. Associated costs were obtained via online database and previously reported costs at the study institution. RESULTS: Mean length of ICU stay in glossectomy RFFF reconstruction was 4.7 days. Only one patient required ICU stay for one night in the SIF group. Mean length of hospital stay was not significantly different in SIF patients vs RFFF patients (12.4 vs 15.4 days, p > 0.05). Mean operative time was significantly lower in the SIF group compared to the RFFF group (347 vs 552 min, p < 0.05). Total mean intraoperative costs were found to be $4780.59 for RFFF operations, versus $2307.94 for SIF. Total mean cost of post-operative stay was $18158.40 in the SIF group and $43617.60 in the RFFF group. Total cost savings were therefore $27931.85 per patient for the SIF group. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated the use of the submental island flap as an alternative to radial forearm free flaps, showing both decreased hospital costs and comparable patient outcomes. Pedicled flaps are making a resurgence in head and neck reconstruction, and the submental island flap offers an excellent alternative to more labour intensive and costly free flap alternatives. BioMed Central 2016-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4743171/ /pubmed/26846792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-016-0124-8 Text en © Forner et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Forner, D.
Phillips, T.
Rigby, M.
Hart, R.
Taylor, M.
Trites, J.
Submental island flap reconstruction reduces cost in oral cancer reconstruction compared to radial forearm free flap reconstruction: a case series and cost analysis
title Submental island flap reconstruction reduces cost in oral cancer reconstruction compared to radial forearm free flap reconstruction: a case series and cost analysis
title_full Submental island flap reconstruction reduces cost in oral cancer reconstruction compared to radial forearm free flap reconstruction: a case series and cost analysis
title_fullStr Submental island flap reconstruction reduces cost in oral cancer reconstruction compared to radial forearm free flap reconstruction: a case series and cost analysis
title_full_unstemmed Submental island flap reconstruction reduces cost in oral cancer reconstruction compared to radial forearm free flap reconstruction: a case series and cost analysis
title_short Submental island flap reconstruction reduces cost in oral cancer reconstruction compared to radial forearm free flap reconstruction: a case series and cost analysis
title_sort submental island flap reconstruction reduces cost in oral cancer reconstruction compared to radial forearm free flap reconstruction: a case series and cost analysis
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4743171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26846792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-016-0124-8
work_keys_str_mv AT fornerd submentalislandflapreconstructionreducescostinoralcancerreconstructioncomparedtoradialforearmfreeflapreconstructionacaseseriesandcostanalysis
AT phillipst submentalislandflapreconstructionreducescostinoralcancerreconstructioncomparedtoradialforearmfreeflapreconstructionacaseseriesandcostanalysis
AT rigbym submentalislandflapreconstructionreducescostinoralcancerreconstructioncomparedtoradialforearmfreeflapreconstructionacaseseriesandcostanalysis
AT hartr submentalislandflapreconstructionreducescostinoralcancerreconstructioncomparedtoradialforearmfreeflapreconstructionacaseseriesandcostanalysis
AT taylorm submentalislandflapreconstructionreducescostinoralcancerreconstructioncomparedtoradialforearmfreeflapreconstructionacaseseriesandcostanalysis
AT tritesj submentalislandflapreconstructionreducescostinoralcancerreconstructioncomparedtoradialforearmfreeflapreconstructionacaseseriesandcostanalysis