Cargando…

Differences in TGF-β1 signaling and clinicopathologic characteristics of histologic subtypes of gastric cancer

BACKGROUND: Aberrant TGF-β1 signaling is suggested to be involved in gastric carcinogenesis. However, the role of TGF-β1 in intestinal-type [i-GC] and diffuse-type [d-GC] gastric cancer remains largely unknown. In this study, we evaluated the expression of TGF-β1 signaling molecules and compared the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pak, Kyung Ho, Kim, Dong Hoon, Kim, Hyunki, Lee, Do Hyung, Cheong, Jae-Ho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4743329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26846663
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2091-x
_version_ 1782414344449949696
author Pak, Kyung Ho
Kim, Dong Hoon
Kim, Hyunki
Lee, Do Hyung
Cheong, Jae-Ho
author_facet Pak, Kyung Ho
Kim, Dong Hoon
Kim, Hyunki
Lee, Do Hyung
Cheong, Jae-Ho
author_sort Pak, Kyung Ho
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Aberrant TGF-β1 signaling is suggested to be involved in gastric carcinogenesis. However, the role of TGF-β1 in intestinal-type [i-GC] and diffuse-type [d-GC] gastric cancer remains largely unknown. In this study, we evaluated the expression of TGF-β1 signaling molecules and compared the clinicopathological features of i-GC and d-GC. METHODS: Patients (n=365, consecutive) who underwent curative gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma in 2005 were enrolled. We performed immunohistochemical staining of TGF-β1, TGF-β1 receptor-2 (TβR2), Smad4, p-ERK1/2, TGF-activated kinase (TAK)1, and p-Akt in 68 paraffin-embedded tumor blocks (33 i-GC and 35 d-GC), scored the expression according to the extent of staining, and evaluated differences between the histologic subtypes. RESULTS: Patients with d-GC differed from those with i-GC as follows: younger and more likely to be female; more aggressive stage; higher recurrence rate. The expression of TGF-β1 and TβR2 was higher in i-GC (P = 0.05 and P <0.001, respectively). The expression of Smad4, a representative molecule of the Smad-dependent pathway, was decreased in both subtypes. TAK1 and p-Akt, two major molecules involved in the Smad-independent pathway, were over-expressed (69 ~ 87 % of cases stained), without a statistically significant difference between i-GC and d-GC. Of note, the expression of p-ERK1/2, a Smad-independent pathway, was significantly increased in i-GC (P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: The clinicopathological characteristics vary in different histologic gastric cancer subtypes. Although TGF-β1 signaling in gastric cancer cells appears hyper-activated in i-GC compared to d-GC, the Smad-dependent pathway seems down-regulated while the Smad-independent pathway seems up-regulated in both histologic subtypes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-016-2091-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4743329
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47433292016-02-06 Differences in TGF-β1 signaling and clinicopathologic characteristics of histologic subtypes of gastric cancer Pak, Kyung Ho Kim, Dong Hoon Kim, Hyunki Lee, Do Hyung Cheong, Jae-Ho BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Aberrant TGF-β1 signaling is suggested to be involved in gastric carcinogenesis. However, the role of TGF-β1 in intestinal-type [i-GC] and diffuse-type [d-GC] gastric cancer remains largely unknown. In this study, we evaluated the expression of TGF-β1 signaling molecules and compared the clinicopathological features of i-GC and d-GC. METHODS: Patients (n=365, consecutive) who underwent curative gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma in 2005 were enrolled. We performed immunohistochemical staining of TGF-β1, TGF-β1 receptor-2 (TβR2), Smad4, p-ERK1/2, TGF-activated kinase (TAK)1, and p-Akt in 68 paraffin-embedded tumor blocks (33 i-GC and 35 d-GC), scored the expression according to the extent of staining, and evaluated differences between the histologic subtypes. RESULTS: Patients with d-GC differed from those with i-GC as follows: younger and more likely to be female; more aggressive stage; higher recurrence rate. The expression of TGF-β1 and TβR2 was higher in i-GC (P = 0.05 and P <0.001, respectively). The expression of Smad4, a representative molecule of the Smad-dependent pathway, was decreased in both subtypes. TAK1 and p-Akt, two major molecules involved in the Smad-independent pathway, were over-expressed (69 ~ 87 % of cases stained), without a statistically significant difference between i-GC and d-GC. Of note, the expression of p-ERK1/2, a Smad-independent pathway, was significantly increased in i-GC (P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: The clinicopathological characteristics vary in different histologic gastric cancer subtypes. Although TGF-β1 signaling in gastric cancer cells appears hyper-activated in i-GC compared to d-GC, the Smad-dependent pathway seems down-regulated while the Smad-independent pathway seems up-regulated in both histologic subtypes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-016-2091-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4743329/ /pubmed/26846663 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2091-x Text en © Pak et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pak, Kyung Ho
Kim, Dong Hoon
Kim, Hyunki
Lee, Do Hyung
Cheong, Jae-Ho
Differences in TGF-β1 signaling and clinicopathologic characteristics of histologic subtypes of gastric cancer
title Differences in TGF-β1 signaling and clinicopathologic characteristics of histologic subtypes of gastric cancer
title_full Differences in TGF-β1 signaling and clinicopathologic characteristics of histologic subtypes of gastric cancer
title_fullStr Differences in TGF-β1 signaling and clinicopathologic characteristics of histologic subtypes of gastric cancer
title_full_unstemmed Differences in TGF-β1 signaling and clinicopathologic characteristics of histologic subtypes of gastric cancer
title_short Differences in TGF-β1 signaling and clinicopathologic characteristics of histologic subtypes of gastric cancer
title_sort differences in tgf-β1 signaling and clinicopathologic characteristics of histologic subtypes of gastric cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4743329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26846663
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2091-x
work_keys_str_mv AT pakkyungho differencesintgfb1signalingandclinicopathologiccharacteristicsofhistologicsubtypesofgastriccancer
AT kimdonghoon differencesintgfb1signalingandclinicopathologiccharacteristicsofhistologicsubtypesofgastriccancer
AT kimhyunki differencesintgfb1signalingandclinicopathologiccharacteristicsofhistologicsubtypesofgastriccancer
AT leedohyung differencesintgfb1signalingandclinicopathologiccharacteristicsofhistologicsubtypesofgastriccancer
AT cheongjaeho differencesintgfb1signalingandclinicopathologiccharacteristicsofhistologicsubtypesofgastriccancer