Cargando…
Creation of the ideal gastric tube: Comparison of three methods: A prospective cohort study
INTRODUCTION: Various types of staplers are used for gastric tube formation after esophagectomy. Using a stapling device, a gastric tube can safely be created in a short amount of time. The problems with gastric tube creation using only linear type staplers include staple overlap as well as the prob...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4744240/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26909152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2016.01.080 |
_version_ | 1782414451927941120 |
---|---|
author | Kimura, Masahiro Mitsui, Akira Kuwabara, Yoshiyuki |
author_facet | Kimura, Masahiro Mitsui, Akira Kuwabara, Yoshiyuki |
author_sort | Kimura, Masahiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Various types of staplers are used for gastric tube formation after esophagectomy. Using a stapling device, a gastric tube can safely be created in a short amount of time. The problems with gastric tube creation using only linear type staplers include staple overlap as well as the problem of cost associated with using multiple staplers. To address this, both linear and radial type staplers have been introduced. We herein compare three methods of gastric tube creation. METHODS: From 2012 to 2014, 62 patients with esophageal cancer underwent esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction. We evaluated and compared the mean number of stapler loads and cost in each groups. RESULTS: The mean number of stapler loads was 6.24 in method A, 5.16 in method B, and 4.33 in method C. The mean cost accounting for total staple fires per case was 3116.07 dollars in the method A group, 2576.74 dollars in the method B group, and 2447.78 dollars in the method C group. Anastomotic leaks developed in 4 cases in the method A group and in 3 cases in the method B group. There were no anastomotic leaks in the method C group. CONCLUSION: We hypothesize that by using radial type staplers, we can create a durable gastric tube and reduce the number of staplers and therefore reduce operative cost. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4744240 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47442402016-02-23 Creation of the ideal gastric tube: Comparison of three methods: A prospective cohort study Kimura, Masahiro Mitsui, Akira Kuwabara, Yoshiyuki Ann Med Surg (Lond) Original Research INTRODUCTION: Various types of staplers are used for gastric tube formation after esophagectomy. Using a stapling device, a gastric tube can safely be created in a short amount of time. The problems with gastric tube creation using only linear type staplers include staple overlap as well as the problem of cost associated with using multiple staplers. To address this, both linear and radial type staplers have been introduced. We herein compare three methods of gastric tube creation. METHODS: From 2012 to 2014, 62 patients with esophageal cancer underwent esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction. We evaluated and compared the mean number of stapler loads and cost in each groups. RESULTS: The mean number of stapler loads was 6.24 in method A, 5.16 in method B, and 4.33 in method C. The mean cost accounting for total staple fires per case was 3116.07 dollars in the method A group, 2576.74 dollars in the method B group, and 2447.78 dollars in the method C group. Anastomotic leaks developed in 4 cases in the method A group and in 3 cases in the method B group. There were no anastomotic leaks in the method C group. CONCLUSION: We hypothesize that by using radial type staplers, we can create a durable gastric tube and reduce the number of staplers and therefore reduce operative cost. Elsevier 2016-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4744240/ /pubmed/26909152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2016.01.080 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Kimura, Masahiro Mitsui, Akira Kuwabara, Yoshiyuki Creation of the ideal gastric tube: Comparison of three methods: A prospective cohort study |
title | Creation of the ideal gastric tube: Comparison of three methods: A prospective cohort study |
title_full | Creation of the ideal gastric tube: Comparison of three methods: A prospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | Creation of the ideal gastric tube: Comparison of three methods: A prospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Creation of the ideal gastric tube: Comparison of three methods: A prospective cohort study |
title_short | Creation of the ideal gastric tube: Comparison of three methods: A prospective cohort study |
title_sort | creation of the ideal gastric tube: comparison of three methods: a prospective cohort study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4744240/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26909152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2016.01.080 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimuramasahiro creationoftheidealgastrictubecomparisonofthreemethodsaprospectivecohortstudy AT mitsuiakira creationoftheidealgastrictubecomparisonofthreemethodsaprospectivecohortstudy AT kuwabarayoshiyuki creationoftheidealgastrictubecomparisonofthreemethodsaprospectivecohortstudy |