Cargando…

Creation of the ideal gastric tube: Comparison of three methods: A prospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION: Various types of staplers are used for gastric tube formation after esophagectomy. Using a stapling device, a gastric tube can safely be created in a short amount of time. The problems with gastric tube creation using only linear type staplers include staple overlap as well as the prob...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kimura, Masahiro, Mitsui, Akira, Kuwabara, Yoshiyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4744240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26909152
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2016.01.080
_version_ 1782414451927941120
author Kimura, Masahiro
Mitsui, Akira
Kuwabara, Yoshiyuki
author_facet Kimura, Masahiro
Mitsui, Akira
Kuwabara, Yoshiyuki
author_sort Kimura, Masahiro
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Various types of staplers are used for gastric tube formation after esophagectomy. Using a stapling device, a gastric tube can safely be created in a short amount of time. The problems with gastric tube creation using only linear type staplers include staple overlap as well as the problem of cost associated with using multiple staplers. To address this, both linear and radial type staplers have been introduced. We herein compare three methods of gastric tube creation. METHODS: From 2012 to 2014, 62 patients with esophageal cancer underwent esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction. We evaluated and compared the mean number of stapler loads and cost in each groups. RESULTS: The mean number of stapler loads was 6.24 in method A, 5.16 in method B, and 4.33 in method C. The mean cost accounting for total staple fires per case was 3116.07 dollars in the method A group, 2576.74 dollars in the method B group, and 2447.78 dollars in the method C group. Anastomotic leaks developed in 4 cases in the method A group and in 3 cases in the method B group. There were no anastomotic leaks in the method C group. CONCLUSION: We hypothesize that by using radial type staplers, we can create a durable gastric tube and reduce the number of staplers and therefore reduce operative cost.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4744240
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47442402016-02-23 Creation of the ideal gastric tube: Comparison of three methods: A prospective cohort study Kimura, Masahiro Mitsui, Akira Kuwabara, Yoshiyuki Ann Med Surg (Lond) Original Research INTRODUCTION: Various types of staplers are used for gastric tube formation after esophagectomy. Using a stapling device, a gastric tube can safely be created in a short amount of time. The problems with gastric tube creation using only linear type staplers include staple overlap as well as the problem of cost associated with using multiple staplers. To address this, both linear and radial type staplers have been introduced. We herein compare three methods of gastric tube creation. METHODS: From 2012 to 2014, 62 patients with esophageal cancer underwent esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction. We evaluated and compared the mean number of stapler loads and cost in each groups. RESULTS: The mean number of stapler loads was 6.24 in method A, 5.16 in method B, and 4.33 in method C. The mean cost accounting for total staple fires per case was 3116.07 dollars in the method A group, 2576.74 dollars in the method B group, and 2447.78 dollars in the method C group. Anastomotic leaks developed in 4 cases in the method A group and in 3 cases in the method B group. There were no anastomotic leaks in the method C group. CONCLUSION: We hypothesize that by using radial type staplers, we can create a durable gastric tube and reduce the number of staplers and therefore reduce operative cost. Elsevier 2016-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4744240/ /pubmed/26909152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2016.01.080 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Kimura, Masahiro
Mitsui, Akira
Kuwabara, Yoshiyuki
Creation of the ideal gastric tube: Comparison of three methods: A prospective cohort study
title Creation of the ideal gastric tube: Comparison of three methods: A prospective cohort study
title_full Creation of the ideal gastric tube: Comparison of three methods: A prospective cohort study
title_fullStr Creation of the ideal gastric tube: Comparison of three methods: A prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Creation of the ideal gastric tube: Comparison of three methods: A prospective cohort study
title_short Creation of the ideal gastric tube: Comparison of three methods: A prospective cohort study
title_sort creation of the ideal gastric tube: comparison of three methods: a prospective cohort study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4744240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26909152
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2016.01.080
work_keys_str_mv AT kimuramasahiro creationoftheidealgastrictubecomparisonofthreemethodsaprospectivecohortstudy
AT mitsuiakira creationoftheidealgastrictubecomparisonofthreemethodsaprospectivecohortstudy
AT kuwabarayoshiyuki creationoftheidealgastrictubecomparisonofthreemethodsaprospectivecohortstudy