Cargando…
The influence of dose distribution on treatment outcome in the SCOPE 1 oesophageal cancer trial
PURPOSE: The first aim of this study was to assess plan quality using a conformity index (CI) and analyse its influence on patient outcome. The second aim was to identify whether clinical and technological factors including planning treatment volume (PTV) volume and treatment delivery method could b...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4744439/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26852238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-016-0594-x |
_version_ | 1782414492312797184 |
---|---|
author | Carrington, Rhys Spezi, Emiliano Gwynne, Sarah Dutton, Peter Hurt, Chris Staffurth, John Crosby, Thomas |
author_facet | Carrington, Rhys Spezi, Emiliano Gwynne, Sarah Dutton, Peter Hurt, Chris Staffurth, John Crosby, Thomas |
author_sort | Carrington, Rhys |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The first aim of this study was to assess plan quality using a conformity index (CI) and analyse its influence on patient outcome. The second aim was to identify whether clinical and technological factors including planning treatment volume (PTV) volume and treatment delivery method could be related to the CI value. METHODS AND MATERIALS: By extending the original concept of the mean distance to conformity (MDC) index, the OverMDC and UnderMDC of the 95 % isodose line (50Gy prescribed dose) to the PTV was calculated for 97 patients from the UK SCOPE 1 trial (ISCRT47718479). Data preparation was carried out in CERR, with Kaplan-Meier and multivariate analysis undertaken in EUCLID and further tests in Microsoft Excel and IBM’s SPSS. RESULTS: A statistically significant breakpoint in the overall survival data, independent of cetuximab, was found with OverMDC (4.4 mm, p < 0.05). This was not the case with UnderMDC. There was a statistically significant difference in PTV volume either side of the OverMDC breakpoint (Mann Whitney p < 0.001) and in OverMDC value dependent on the treatment delivery method (mean IMRT = 2.1 mm, mean 3D-CRT = 4.1 mm Mann Whitney p < 0.001). Re-planning the worst performing patients according to OverMDC from 3D-CRT to VMAT resulted in a mean reduction in OverMDC of 2.8 mm (1.6–4.0 mm). OverMDC was not significant in multivariate analysis that included age, sex, staging, tumour type, and position. CONCLUSION: Although not significant when included in multivariate analysis, we have shown in univariate analysis that a patient’s OverMDC is correlated with overall survival. OverMDC is strongly related to IMRT and to a lesser extent with PTV volume. We recommend that VMAT planning should be used for oesophageal planning when available and that attention should be paid to the conformity of the 95 % to the PTV. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4744439 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47444392016-02-07 The influence of dose distribution on treatment outcome in the SCOPE 1 oesophageal cancer trial Carrington, Rhys Spezi, Emiliano Gwynne, Sarah Dutton, Peter Hurt, Chris Staffurth, John Crosby, Thomas Radiat Oncol Research PURPOSE: The first aim of this study was to assess plan quality using a conformity index (CI) and analyse its influence on patient outcome. The second aim was to identify whether clinical and technological factors including planning treatment volume (PTV) volume and treatment delivery method could be related to the CI value. METHODS AND MATERIALS: By extending the original concept of the mean distance to conformity (MDC) index, the OverMDC and UnderMDC of the 95 % isodose line (50Gy prescribed dose) to the PTV was calculated for 97 patients from the UK SCOPE 1 trial (ISCRT47718479). Data preparation was carried out in CERR, with Kaplan-Meier and multivariate analysis undertaken in EUCLID and further tests in Microsoft Excel and IBM’s SPSS. RESULTS: A statistically significant breakpoint in the overall survival data, independent of cetuximab, was found with OverMDC (4.4 mm, p < 0.05). This was not the case with UnderMDC. There was a statistically significant difference in PTV volume either side of the OverMDC breakpoint (Mann Whitney p < 0.001) and in OverMDC value dependent on the treatment delivery method (mean IMRT = 2.1 mm, mean 3D-CRT = 4.1 mm Mann Whitney p < 0.001). Re-planning the worst performing patients according to OverMDC from 3D-CRT to VMAT resulted in a mean reduction in OverMDC of 2.8 mm (1.6–4.0 mm). OverMDC was not significant in multivariate analysis that included age, sex, staging, tumour type, and position. CONCLUSION: Although not significant when included in multivariate analysis, we have shown in univariate analysis that a patient’s OverMDC is correlated with overall survival. OverMDC is strongly related to IMRT and to a lesser extent with PTV volume. We recommend that VMAT planning should be used for oesophageal planning when available and that attention should be paid to the conformity of the 95 % to the PTV. BioMed Central 2016-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4744439/ /pubmed/26852238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-016-0594-x Text en © Carrington et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Carrington, Rhys Spezi, Emiliano Gwynne, Sarah Dutton, Peter Hurt, Chris Staffurth, John Crosby, Thomas The influence of dose distribution on treatment outcome in the SCOPE 1 oesophageal cancer trial |
title | The influence of dose distribution on treatment outcome in the SCOPE 1 oesophageal cancer trial |
title_full | The influence of dose distribution on treatment outcome in the SCOPE 1 oesophageal cancer trial |
title_fullStr | The influence of dose distribution on treatment outcome in the SCOPE 1 oesophageal cancer trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The influence of dose distribution on treatment outcome in the SCOPE 1 oesophageal cancer trial |
title_short | The influence of dose distribution on treatment outcome in the SCOPE 1 oesophageal cancer trial |
title_sort | influence of dose distribution on treatment outcome in the scope 1 oesophageal cancer trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4744439/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26852238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-016-0594-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carringtonrhys theinfluenceofdosedistributionontreatmentoutcomeinthescope1oesophagealcancertrial AT speziemiliano theinfluenceofdosedistributionontreatmentoutcomeinthescope1oesophagealcancertrial AT gwynnesarah theinfluenceofdosedistributionontreatmentoutcomeinthescope1oesophagealcancertrial AT duttonpeter theinfluenceofdosedistributionontreatmentoutcomeinthescope1oesophagealcancertrial AT hurtchris theinfluenceofdosedistributionontreatmentoutcomeinthescope1oesophagealcancertrial AT staffurthjohn theinfluenceofdosedistributionontreatmentoutcomeinthescope1oesophagealcancertrial AT crosbythomas theinfluenceofdosedistributionontreatmentoutcomeinthescope1oesophagealcancertrial AT carringtonrhys influenceofdosedistributionontreatmentoutcomeinthescope1oesophagealcancertrial AT speziemiliano influenceofdosedistributionontreatmentoutcomeinthescope1oesophagealcancertrial AT gwynnesarah influenceofdosedistributionontreatmentoutcomeinthescope1oesophagealcancertrial AT duttonpeter influenceofdosedistributionontreatmentoutcomeinthescope1oesophagealcancertrial AT hurtchris influenceofdosedistributionontreatmentoutcomeinthescope1oesophagealcancertrial AT staffurthjohn influenceofdosedistributionontreatmentoutcomeinthescope1oesophagealcancertrial AT crosbythomas influenceofdosedistributionontreatmentoutcomeinthescope1oesophagealcancertrial |