Cargando…
Gene set analysis using sufficient dimension reduction
BACKGROUND: Gene set analysis (GSA) aims to evaluate the association between the expression of biological pathways, or a priori defined gene sets, and a particular phenotype. Numerous GSA methods have been proposed to assess the enrichment of sets of genes. However, most methods are developed with r...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4744442/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26852017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-016-0928-6 |
_version_ | 1782414493002760192 |
---|---|
author | Hsueh, Huey-Miin Tsai, Chen-An |
author_facet | Hsueh, Huey-Miin Tsai, Chen-An |
author_sort | Hsueh, Huey-Miin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Gene set analysis (GSA) aims to evaluate the association between the expression of biological pathways, or a priori defined gene sets, and a particular phenotype. Numerous GSA methods have been proposed to assess the enrichment of sets of genes. However, most methods are developed with respect to a specific alternative scenario, such as a differential mean pattern or a differential coexpression. Moreover, a very limited number of methods can handle either binary, categorical, or continuous phenotypes. In this paper, we develop two novel GSA tests, called SDRs, based on the sufficient dimension reduction technique, which aims to capture sufficient information about the relationship between genes and the phenotype. The advantages of our proposed methods are that they allow for categorical and continuous phenotypes, and they are also able to identify a variety of enriched gene sets. RESULTS: Through simulation studies, we compared the type I error and power of SDRs with existing GSA methods for binary, triple, and continuous phenotypes. We found that SDR methods adequately control the type I error rate at the pre-specified nominal level, and they have a satisfactory power to detect gene sets with differential coexpression and to test non-linear associations between gene sets and a continuous phenotype. In addition, the SDR methods were compared with seven widely-used GSA methods using two real microarray datasets for illustration. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that the SDR methods outperform the others because of their flexibility with regard to handling different kinds of phenotypes and their power to detect a wide range of alternative scenarios. Our real data analysis highlights the differences between GSA methods for detecting enriched gene sets. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12859-016-0928-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4744442 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47444422016-02-07 Gene set analysis using sufficient dimension reduction Hsueh, Huey-Miin Tsai, Chen-An BMC Bioinformatics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Gene set analysis (GSA) aims to evaluate the association between the expression of biological pathways, or a priori defined gene sets, and a particular phenotype. Numerous GSA methods have been proposed to assess the enrichment of sets of genes. However, most methods are developed with respect to a specific alternative scenario, such as a differential mean pattern or a differential coexpression. Moreover, a very limited number of methods can handle either binary, categorical, or continuous phenotypes. In this paper, we develop two novel GSA tests, called SDRs, based on the sufficient dimension reduction technique, which aims to capture sufficient information about the relationship between genes and the phenotype. The advantages of our proposed methods are that they allow for categorical and continuous phenotypes, and they are also able to identify a variety of enriched gene sets. RESULTS: Through simulation studies, we compared the type I error and power of SDRs with existing GSA methods for binary, triple, and continuous phenotypes. We found that SDR methods adequately control the type I error rate at the pre-specified nominal level, and they have a satisfactory power to detect gene sets with differential coexpression and to test non-linear associations between gene sets and a continuous phenotype. In addition, the SDR methods were compared with seven widely-used GSA methods using two real microarray datasets for illustration. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that the SDR methods outperform the others because of their flexibility with regard to handling different kinds of phenotypes and their power to detect a wide range of alternative scenarios. Our real data analysis highlights the differences between GSA methods for detecting enriched gene sets. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12859-016-0928-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4744442/ /pubmed/26852017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-016-0928-6 Text en © Hsueh and Tsai. 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Article Hsueh, Huey-Miin Tsai, Chen-An Gene set analysis using sufficient dimension reduction |
title | Gene set analysis using sufficient dimension reduction |
title_full | Gene set analysis using sufficient dimension reduction |
title_fullStr | Gene set analysis using sufficient dimension reduction |
title_full_unstemmed | Gene set analysis using sufficient dimension reduction |
title_short | Gene set analysis using sufficient dimension reduction |
title_sort | gene set analysis using sufficient dimension reduction |
topic | Methodology Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4744442/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26852017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-016-0928-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hsuehhueymiin genesetanalysisusingsufficientdimensionreduction AT tsaichenan genesetanalysisusingsufficientdimensionreduction |