Cargando…

Safety and physiological effects of two different doses of elosulfase alfa in patients with morquio a syndrome: A randomized, double‐blind, pilot study

The primary treatment outcomes of a phase 2, randomized, double‐blind, pilot study evaluating safety, physiological, and pharmacological effects of elosulfase alfa in patients with Morquio A syndrome are herewith presented. Patients aged ≥7 years and able to walk ≥200 m in the 6‐min walk test (6MWT)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burton, Barbara K., Berger, Kenneth I., Lewis, Gregory D., Tarnopolsky, Mark, Treadwell, Marsha, Mitchell, John J., Muschol, Nicole, Jones, Simon A., Sutton, V. Reid, Pastores, Gregory M., Lau, Heather, Sparkes, Rebecca, Genter, Fred, Shaywitz, Adam J., Harmatz, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4744659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26069231
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.37172
_version_ 1782414507401805824
author Burton, Barbara K.
Berger, Kenneth I.
Lewis, Gregory D.
Tarnopolsky, Mark
Treadwell, Marsha
Mitchell, John J.
Muschol, Nicole
Jones, Simon A.
Sutton, V. Reid
Pastores, Gregory M.
Lau, Heather
Sparkes, Rebecca
Genter, Fred
Shaywitz, Adam J.
Harmatz, Paul
author_facet Burton, Barbara K.
Berger, Kenneth I.
Lewis, Gregory D.
Tarnopolsky, Mark
Treadwell, Marsha
Mitchell, John J.
Muschol, Nicole
Jones, Simon A.
Sutton, V. Reid
Pastores, Gregory M.
Lau, Heather
Sparkes, Rebecca
Genter, Fred
Shaywitz, Adam J.
Harmatz, Paul
author_sort Burton, Barbara K.
collection PubMed
description The primary treatment outcomes of a phase 2, randomized, double‐blind, pilot study evaluating safety, physiological, and pharmacological effects of elosulfase alfa in patients with Morquio A syndrome are herewith presented. Patients aged ≥7 years and able to walk ≥200 m in the 6‐min walk test (6MWT) were randomized to elosulfase alfa 2.0 or 4.0 mg/kg/week for 27 weeks. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety of both doses. Secondary objectives were to evaluate effects on endurance (6MWT and 3‐min stair climb test [3MSCT]), exercise capacity (cardio‐pulmonary exercise test [CPET]), respiratory function, muscle strength, cardiac function, pain, and urine keratan sulfate (uKS) levels, and to determine pharmacokinetic parameters. Twenty‐five patients were enrolled (15 randomized to 2.0 mg/kg/week and 10 to 4.0 mg/kg/week). No new or unexpected safety signals were observed. After 24 weeks, there were no improvements versus baseline in the 6MWT, yet numerical improvements were seen in the 3MSCT with 4.0 mg/kg/week. uKS and pharmacokinetic data suggested no linear relationship over the 2.0–4.0 mg/kg dose range. Overall, an abnormal exercise capacity (evaluated in 10 and 5 patients in the 2.0 and 4.0 mg/kg/week groups, respectively), impaired muscle strength, and considerable pain were observed at baseline, and there were trends towards improvements in all domains after treatment. In conclusion, preliminary data of this small study in a Morquio A population with relatively good endurance confirmed the acceptable safety profile of elosulfase alfa and showed a trend of increased exercise capacity and muscle strength and decreased pain. © 2015 The Authors. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4744659
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47446592016-02-18 Safety and physiological effects of two different doses of elosulfase alfa in patients with morquio a syndrome: A randomized, double‐blind, pilot study Burton, Barbara K. Berger, Kenneth I. Lewis, Gregory D. Tarnopolsky, Mark Treadwell, Marsha Mitchell, John J. Muschol, Nicole Jones, Simon A. Sutton, V. Reid Pastores, Gregory M. Lau, Heather Sparkes, Rebecca Genter, Fred Shaywitz, Adam J. Harmatz, Paul Am J Med Genet A Research Articles The primary treatment outcomes of a phase 2, randomized, double‐blind, pilot study evaluating safety, physiological, and pharmacological effects of elosulfase alfa in patients with Morquio A syndrome are herewith presented. Patients aged ≥7 years and able to walk ≥200 m in the 6‐min walk test (6MWT) were randomized to elosulfase alfa 2.0 or 4.0 mg/kg/week for 27 weeks. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety of both doses. Secondary objectives were to evaluate effects on endurance (6MWT and 3‐min stair climb test [3MSCT]), exercise capacity (cardio‐pulmonary exercise test [CPET]), respiratory function, muscle strength, cardiac function, pain, and urine keratan sulfate (uKS) levels, and to determine pharmacokinetic parameters. Twenty‐five patients were enrolled (15 randomized to 2.0 mg/kg/week and 10 to 4.0 mg/kg/week). No new or unexpected safety signals were observed. After 24 weeks, there were no improvements versus baseline in the 6MWT, yet numerical improvements were seen in the 3MSCT with 4.0 mg/kg/week. uKS and pharmacokinetic data suggested no linear relationship over the 2.0–4.0 mg/kg dose range. Overall, an abnormal exercise capacity (evaluated in 10 and 5 patients in the 2.0 and 4.0 mg/kg/week groups, respectively), impaired muscle strength, and considerable pain were observed at baseline, and there were trends towards improvements in all domains after treatment. In conclusion, preliminary data of this small study in a Morquio A population with relatively good endurance confirmed the acceptable safety profile of elosulfase alfa and showed a trend of increased exercise capacity and muscle strength and decreased pain. © 2015 The Authors. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-06-10 2015-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4744659/ /pubmed/26069231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.37172 Text en © 2015 The Authors. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Burton, Barbara K.
Berger, Kenneth I.
Lewis, Gregory D.
Tarnopolsky, Mark
Treadwell, Marsha
Mitchell, John J.
Muschol, Nicole
Jones, Simon A.
Sutton, V. Reid
Pastores, Gregory M.
Lau, Heather
Sparkes, Rebecca
Genter, Fred
Shaywitz, Adam J.
Harmatz, Paul
Safety and physiological effects of two different doses of elosulfase alfa in patients with morquio a syndrome: A randomized, double‐blind, pilot study
title Safety and physiological effects of two different doses of elosulfase alfa in patients with morquio a syndrome: A randomized, double‐blind, pilot study
title_full Safety and physiological effects of two different doses of elosulfase alfa in patients with morquio a syndrome: A randomized, double‐blind, pilot study
title_fullStr Safety and physiological effects of two different doses of elosulfase alfa in patients with morquio a syndrome: A randomized, double‐blind, pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Safety and physiological effects of two different doses of elosulfase alfa in patients with morquio a syndrome: A randomized, double‐blind, pilot study
title_short Safety and physiological effects of two different doses of elosulfase alfa in patients with morquio a syndrome: A randomized, double‐blind, pilot study
title_sort safety and physiological effects of two different doses of elosulfase alfa in patients with morquio a syndrome: a randomized, double‐blind, pilot study
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4744659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26069231
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.37172
work_keys_str_mv AT burtonbarbarak safetyandphysiologicaleffectsoftwodifferentdosesofelosulfasealfainpatientswithmorquioasyndromearandomizeddoubleblindpilotstudy
AT bergerkennethi safetyandphysiologicaleffectsoftwodifferentdosesofelosulfasealfainpatientswithmorquioasyndromearandomizeddoubleblindpilotstudy
AT lewisgregoryd safetyandphysiologicaleffectsoftwodifferentdosesofelosulfasealfainpatientswithmorquioasyndromearandomizeddoubleblindpilotstudy
AT tarnopolskymark safetyandphysiologicaleffectsoftwodifferentdosesofelosulfasealfainpatientswithmorquioasyndromearandomizeddoubleblindpilotstudy
AT treadwellmarsha safetyandphysiologicaleffectsoftwodifferentdosesofelosulfasealfainpatientswithmorquioasyndromearandomizeddoubleblindpilotstudy
AT mitchelljohnj safetyandphysiologicaleffectsoftwodifferentdosesofelosulfasealfainpatientswithmorquioasyndromearandomizeddoubleblindpilotstudy
AT muscholnicole safetyandphysiologicaleffectsoftwodifferentdosesofelosulfasealfainpatientswithmorquioasyndromearandomizeddoubleblindpilotstudy
AT jonessimona safetyandphysiologicaleffectsoftwodifferentdosesofelosulfasealfainpatientswithmorquioasyndromearandomizeddoubleblindpilotstudy
AT suttonvreid safetyandphysiologicaleffectsoftwodifferentdosesofelosulfasealfainpatientswithmorquioasyndromearandomizeddoubleblindpilotstudy
AT pastoresgregorym safetyandphysiologicaleffectsoftwodifferentdosesofelosulfasealfainpatientswithmorquioasyndromearandomizeddoubleblindpilotstudy
AT lauheather safetyandphysiologicaleffectsoftwodifferentdosesofelosulfasealfainpatientswithmorquioasyndromearandomizeddoubleblindpilotstudy
AT sparkesrebecca safetyandphysiologicaleffectsoftwodifferentdosesofelosulfasealfainpatientswithmorquioasyndromearandomizeddoubleblindpilotstudy
AT genterfred safetyandphysiologicaleffectsoftwodifferentdosesofelosulfasealfainpatientswithmorquioasyndromearandomizeddoubleblindpilotstudy
AT shaywitzadamj safetyandphysiologicaleffectsoftwodifferentdosesofelosulfasealfainpatientswithmorquioasyndromearandomizeddoubleblindpilotstudy
AT harmatzpaul safetyandphysiologicaleffectsoftwodifferentdosesofelosulfasealfainpatientswithmorquioasyndromearandomizeddoubleblindpilotstudy