Cargando…
Safety and physiological effects of two different doses of elosulfase alfa in patients with morquio a syndrome: A randomized, double‐blind, pilot study
The primary treatment outcomes of a phase 2, randomized, double‐blind, pilot study evaluating safety, physiological, and pharmacological effects of elosulfase alfa in patients with Morquio A syndrome are herewith presented. Patients aged ≥7 years and able to walk ≥200 m in the 6‐min walk test (6MWT)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4744659/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26069231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.37172 |
_version_ | 1782414507401805824 |
---|---|
author | Burton, Barbara K. Berger, Kenneth I. Lewis, Gregory D. Tarnopolsky, Mark Treadwell, Marsha Mitchell, John J. Muschol, Nicole Jones, Simon A. Sutton, V. Reid Pastores, Gregory M. Lau, Heather Sparkes, Rebecca Genter, Fred Shaywitz, Adam J. Harmatz, Paul |
author_facet | Burton, Barbara K. Berger, Kenneth I. Lewis, Gregory D. Tarnopolsky, Mark Treadwell, Marsha Mitchell, John J. Muschol, Nicole Jones, Simon A. Sutton, V. Reid Pastores, Gregory M. Lau, Heather Sparkes, Rebecca Genter, Fred Shaywitz, Adam J. Harmatz, Paul |
author_sort | Burton, Barbara K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The primary treatment outcomes of a phase 2, randomized, double‐blind, pilot study evaluating safety, physiological, and pharmacological effects of elosulfase alfa in patients with Morquio A syndrome are herewith presented. Patients aged ≥7 years and able to walk ≥200 m in the 6‐min walk test (6MWT) were randomized to elosulfase alfa 2.0 or 4.0 mg/kg/week for 27 weeks. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety of both doses. Secondary objectives were to evaluate effects on endurance (6MWT and 3‐min stair climb test [3MSCT]), exercise capacity (cardio‐pulmonary exercise test [CPET]), respiratory function, muscle strength, cardiac function, pain, and urine keratan sulfate (uKS) levels, and to determine pharmacokinetic parameters. Twenty‐five patients were enrolled (15 randomized to 2.0 mg/kg/week and 10 to 4.0 mg/kg/week). No new or unexpected safety signals were observed. After 24 weeks, there were no improvements versus baseline in the 6MWT, yet numerical improvements were seen in the 3MSCT with 4.0 mg/kg/week. uKS and pharmacokinetic data suggested no linear relationship over the 2.0–4.0 mg/kg dose range. Overall, an abnormal exercise capacity (evaluated in 10 and 5 patients in the 2.0 and 4.0 mg/kg/week groups, respectively), impaired muscle strength, and considerable pain were observed at baseline, and there were trends towards improvements in all domains after treatment. In conclusion, preliminary data of this small study in a Morquio A population with relatively good endurance confirmed the acceptable safety profile of elosulfase alfa and showed a trend of increased exercise capacity and muscle strength and decreased pain. © 2015 The Authors. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4744659 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47446592016-02-18 Safety and physiological effects of two different doses of elosulfase alfa in patients with morquio a syndrome: A randomized, double‐blind, pilot study Burton, Barbara K. Berger, Kenneth I. Lewis, Gregory D. Tarnopolsky, Mark Treadwell, Marsha Mitchell, John J. Muschol, Nicole Jones, Simon A. Sutton, V. Reid Pastores, Gregory M. Lau, Heather Sparkes, Rebecca Genter, Fred Shaywitz, Adam J. Harmatz, Paul Am J Med Genet A Research Articles The primary treatment outcomes of a phase 2, randomized, double‐blind, pilot study evaluating safety, physiological, and pharmacological effects of elosulfase alfa in patients with Morquio A syndrome are herewith presented. Patients aged ≥7 years and able to walk ≥200 m in the 6‐min walk test (6MWT) were randomized to elosulfase alfa 2.0 or 4.0 mg/kg/week for 27 weeks. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety of both doses. Secondary objectives were to evaluate effects on endurance (6MWT and 3‐min stair climb test [3MSCT]), exercise capacity (cardio‐pulmonary exercise test [CPET]), respiratory function, muscle strength, cardiac function, pain, and urine keratan sulfate (uKS) levels, and to determine pharmacokinetic parameters. Twenty‐five patients were enrolled (15 randomized to 2.0 mg/kg/week and 10 to 4.0 mg/kg/week). No new or unexpected safety signals were observed. After 24 weeks, there were no improvements versus baseline in the 6MWT, yet numerical improvements were seen in the 3MSCT with 4.0 mg/kg/week. uKS and pharmacokinetic data suggested no linear relationship over the 2.0–4.0 mg/kg dose range. Overall, an abnormal exercise capacity (evaluated in 10 and 5 patients in the 2.0 and 4.0 mg/kg/week groups, respectively), impaired muscle strength, and considerable pain were observed at baseline, and there were trends towards improvements in all domains after treatment. In conclusion, preliminary data of this small study in a Morquio A population with relatively good endurance confirmed the acceptable safety profile of elosulfase alfa and showed a trend of increased exercise capacity and muscle strength and decreased pain. © 2015 The Authors. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-06-10 2015-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4744659/ /pubmed/26069231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.37172 Text en © 2015 The Authors. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Burton, Barbara K. Berger, Kenneth I. Lewis, Gregory D. Tarnopolsky, Mark Treadwell, Marsha Mitchell, John J. Muschol, Nicole Jones, Simon A. Sutton, V. Reid Pastores, Gregory M. Lau, Heather Sparkes, Rebecca Genter, Fred Shaywitz, Adam J. Harmatz, Paul Safety and physiological effects of two different doses of elosulfase alfa in patients with morquio a syndrome: A randomized, double‐blind, pilot study |
title | Safety and physiological effects of two different doses of elosulfase alfa in patients with morquio a syndrome: A randomized, double‐blind, pilot study |
title_full | Safety and physiological effects of two different doses of elosulfase alfa in patients with morquio a syndrome: A randomized, double‐blind, pilot study |
title_fullStr | Safety and physiological effects of two different doses of elosulfase alfa in patients with morquio a syndrome: A randomized, double‐blind, pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and physiological effects of two different doses of elosulfase alfa in patients with morquio a syndrome: A randomized, double‐blind, pilot study |
title_short | Safety and physiological effects of two different doses of elosulfase alfa in patients with morquio a syndrome: A randomized, double‐blind, pilot study |
title_sort | safety and physiological effects of two different doses of elosulfase alfa in patients with morquio a syndrome: a randomized, double‐blind, pilot study |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4744659/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26069231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.37172 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT burtonbarbarak safetyandphysiologicaleffectsoftwodifferentdosesofelosulfasealfainpatientswithmorquioasyndromearandomizeddoubleblindpilotstudy AT bergerkennethi safetyandphysiologicaleffectsoftwodifferentdosesofelosulfasealfainpatientswithmorquioasyndromearandomizeddoubleblindpilotstudy AT lewisgregoryd safetyandphysiologicaleffectsoftwodifferentdosesofelosulfasealfainpatientswithmorquioasyndromearandomizeddoubleblindpilotstudy AT tarnopolskymark safetyandphysiologicaleffectsoftwodifferentdosesofelosulfasealfainpatientswithmorquioasyndromearandomizeddoubleblindpilotstudy AT treadwellmarsha safetyandphysiologicaleffectsoftwodifferentdosesofelosulfasealfainpatientswithmorquioasyndromearandomizeddoubleblindpilotstudy AT mitchelljohnj safetyandphysiologicaleffectsoftwodifferentdosesofelosulfasealfainpatientswithmorquioasyndromearandomizeddoubleblindpilotstudy AT muscholnicole safetyandphysiologicaleffectsoftwodifferentdosesofelosulfasealfainpatientswithmorquioasyndromearandomizeddoubleblindpilotstudy AT jonessimona safetyandphysiologicaleffectsoftwodifferentdosesofelosulfasealfainpatientswithmorquioasyndromearandomizeddoubleblindpilotstudy AT suttonvreid safetyandphysiologicaleffectsoftwodifferentdosesofelosulfasealfainpatientswithmorquioasyndromearandomizeddoubleblindpilotstudy AT pastoresgregorym safetyandphysiologicaleffectsoftwodifferentdosesofelosulfasealfainpatientswithmorquioasyndromearandomizeddoubleblindpilotstudy AT lauheather safetyandphysiologicaleffectsoftwodifferentdosesofelosulfasealfainpatientswithmorquioasyndromearandomizeddoubleblindpilotstudy AT sparkesrebecca safetyandphysiologicaleffectsoftwodifferentdosesofelosulfasealfainpatientswithmorquioasyndromearandomizeddoubleblindpilotstudy AT genterfred safetyandphysiologicaleffectsoftwodifferentdosesofelosulfasealfainpatientswithmorquioasyndromearandomizeddoubleblindpilotstudy AT shaywitzadamj safetyandphysiologicaleffectsoftwodifferentdosesofelosulfasealfainpatientswithmorquioasyndromearandomizeddoubleblindpilotstudy AT harmatzpaul safetyandphysiologicaleffectsoftwodifferentdosesofelosulfasealfainpatientswithmorquioasyndromearandomizeddoubleblindpilotstudy |