Cargando…

Disciplinary reporting affects the interpretation of climate change impacts in global oceans

Climate change is affecting marine ecosystems, but different investigative approaches in physical, chemical, and biological disciplines may influence interpretations of climate‐driven changes in the ocean. Here, we review the ocean change literature from 2007 to 2012 based on 461 of the most highly...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hauser, Donna D. W., Tobin, Elizabeth D., Feifel, Kirsten M., Shah, Vega, Pietri, Diana M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4744676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26081243
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12978
_version_ 1782414510365081600
author Hauser, Donna D. W.
Tobin, Elizabeth D.
Feifel, Kirsten M.
Shah, Vega
Pietri, Diana M.
author_facet Hauser, Donna D. W.
Tobin, Elizabeth D.
Feifel, Kirsten M.
Shah, Vega
Pietri, Diana M.
author_sort Hauser, Donna D. W.
collection PubMed
description Climate change is affecting marine ecosystems, but different investigative approaches in physical, chemical, and biological disciplines may influence interpretations of climate‐driven changes in the ocean. Here, we review the ocean change literature from 2007 to 2012 based on 461 of the most highly cited studies in physical and chemical oceanography and three biological subdisciplines. Using highly cited studies, we focus on research that has shaped recent discourse on climate‐driven ocean change. Our review identified significant differences in spatial and temporal scales of investigation among disciplines. Physical/chemical studies had a median duration of 29 years (n = 150) and covered the greatest study areas (median 1.41 × 10(7) km(2), n = 148). Few biological studies were conducted over similar spatial and temporal scales (median 8 years, n = 215; median 302 km(2), n = 196), suggesting a more limited ability to separate climate‐related responses from natural variability. We linked physical/chemical and biological disciplines by tracking studies examining biological responses to changing ocean conditions. Of the 545 biological responses recorded, a single physical or chemical stressor was usually implicated as the cause (59%), with temperature as the most common primary stressor (44%). The most frequently studied biological responses were changes in physiology (31%) and population abundance (30%). Differences in disciplinary studies, as identified in this review, can ultimately influence how researchers interpret climate‐related impacts in marine systems. We identified research gaps and the need for more discourse in (1) the Indian and other Southern Hemisphere ocean basins; (2) research themes such as archaea, bacteria, viruses, mangroves, turtles, and ocean acidification; (3) physical and chemical stressors such as dissolved oxygen, salinity, and upwelling; and (4) adaptive responses of marine organisms to climate‐driven ocean change. Our findings reveal that highly cited biological studies are rarely conducted on scales that match those of physical and chemical studies. Rather, we suggest a need for measuring responses at biologically relevant scales.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4744676
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47446762016-02-18 Disciplinary reporting affects the interpretation of climate change impacts in global oceans Hauser, Donna D. W. Tobin, Elizabeth D. Feifel, Kirsten M. Shah, Vega Pietri, Diana M. Glob Chang Biol Research Reviews Climate change is affecting marine ecosystems, but different investigative approaches in physical, chemical, and biological disciplines may influence interpretations of climate‐driven changes in the ocean. Here, we review the ocean change literature from 2007 to 2012 based on 461 of the most highly cited studies in physical and chemical oceanography and three biological subdisciplines. Using highly cited studies, we focus on research that has shaped recent discourse on climate‐driven ocean change. Our review identified significant differences in spatial and temporal scales of investigation among disciplines. Physical/chemical studies had a median duration of 29 years (n = 150) and covered the greatest study areas (median 1.41 × 10(7) km(2), n = 148). Few biological studies were conducted over similar spatial and temporal scales (median 8 years, n = 215; median 302 km(2), n = 196), suggesting a more limited ability to separate climate‐related responses from natural variability. We linked physical/chemical and biological disciplines by tracking studies examining biological responses to changing ocean conditions. Of the 545 biological responses recorded, a single physical or chemical stressor was usually implicated as the cause (59%), with temperature as the most common primary stressor (44%). The most frequently studied biological responses were changes in physiology (31%) and population abundance (30%). Differences in disciplinary studies, as identified in this review, can ultimately influence how researchers interpret climate‐related impacts in marine systems. We identified research gaps and the need for more discourse in (1) the Indian and other Southern Hemisphere ocean basins; (2) research themes such as archaea, bacteria, viruses, mangroves, turtles, and ocean acidification; (3) physical and chemical stressors such as dissolved oxygen, salinity, and upwelling; and (4) adaptive responses of marine organisms to climate‐driven ocean change. Our findings reveal that highly cited biological studies are rarely conducted on scales that match those of physical and chemical studies. Rather, we suggest a need for measuring responses at biologically relevant scales. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-06-17 2016-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4744676/ /pubmed/26081243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12978 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Global Change Biology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Reviews
Hauser, Donna D. W.
Tobin, Elizabeth D.
Feifel, Kirsten M.
Shah, Vega
Pietri, Diana M.
Disciplinary reporting affects the interpretation of climate change impacts in global oceans
title Disciplinary reporting affects the interpretation of climate change impacts in global oceans
title_full Disciplinary reporting affects the interpretation of climate change impacts in global oceans
title_fullStr Disciplinary reporting affects the interpretation of climate change impacts in global oceans
title_full_unstemmed Disciplinary reporting affects the interpretation of climate change impacts in global oceans
title_short Disciplinary reporting affects the interpretation of climate change impacts in global oceans
title_sort disciplinary reporting affects the interpretation of climate change impacts in global oceans
topic Research Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4744676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26081243
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12978
work_keys_str_mv AT hauserdonnadw disciplinaryreportingaffectstheinterpretationofclimatechangeimpactsinglobaloceans
AT tobinelizabethd disciplinaryreportingaffectstheinterpretationofclimatechangeimpactsinglobaloceans
AT feifelkirstenm disciplinaryreportingaffectstheinterpretationofclimatechangeimpactsinglobaloceans
AT shahvega disciplinaryreportingaffectstheinterpretationofclimatechangeimpactsinglobaloceans
AT pietridianam disciplinaryreportingaffectstheinterpretationofclimatechangeimpactsinglobaloceans