Cargando…
C9orf72 ablation in mice does not cause motor neuron degeneration or motor deficits
OBJECTIVE: How hexanucleotide (GGGGCC) repeat expansions in C9ORF72 cause amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) remains poorly understood. Both gain‐ and loss‐of‐function mechanisms have been proposed. Evidence supporting these mechanisms in vivo is, however, incomplete. Here we determined the effect...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4744979/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26044557 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ana.24453 |
_version_ | 1782414557812097024 |
---|---|
author | Koppers, Max Blokhuis, Anna M. Westeneng, Henk‐Jan Terpstra, Margo L. Zundel, Caroline A. C. Vieira de Sá, Renata Schellevis, Raymond D. Waite, Adrian J. Blake, Derek J. Veldink, Jan H. van den Berg, Leonard H. Pasterkamp, R. Jeroen |
author_facet | Koppers, Max Blokhuis, Anna M. Westeneng, Henk‐Jan Terpstra, Margo L. Zundel, Caroline A. C. Vieira de Sá, Renata Schellevis, Raymond D. Waite, Adrian J. Blake, Derek J. Veldink, Jan H. van den Berg, Leonard H. Pasterkamp, R. Jeroen |
author_sort | Koppers, Max |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: How hexanucleotide (GGGGCC) repeat expansions in C9ORF72 cause amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) remains poorly understood. Both gain‐ and loss‐of‐function mechanisms have been proposed. Evidence supporting these mechanisms in vivo is, however, incomplete. Here we determined the effect of C9orf72 loss‐of‐function in mice. METHODS: We generated and analyzed a conditional C9orf72 knockout mouse model. C9orf72(fl/fl) mice were crossed with Nestin‐Cre mice to selectively remove C9orf72 from neurons and glial cells. Immunohistochemistry was performed to study motor neurons and neuromuscular integrity, as well as several pathological hallmarks of ALS, such as gliosis and TDP‐43 mislocalization. In addition, motor function and survival were assessed. RESULTS: Neural‐specific ablation of C9orf72 in conditional C9orf72 knockout mice resulted in significantly reduced body weight but did not induce motor neuron degeneration, defects in motor function, or altered survival. INTERPRETATION: Our data suggest that C9orf72 loss‐of‐function, by itself, is insufficient to cause motor neuron disease. These results may have important implications for the development of therapeutic strategies for C9orf72‐associated ALS. Ann Neurol 2015;78:426–438 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4744979 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47449792016-02-18 C9orf72 ablation in mice does not cause motor neuron degeneration or motor deficits Koppers, Max Blokhuis, Anna M. Westeneng, Henk‐Jan Terpstra, Margo L. Zundel, Caroline A. C. Vieira de Sá, Renata Schellevis, Raymond D. Waite, Adrian J. Blake, Derek J. Veldink, Jan H. van den Berg, Leonard H. Pasterkamp, R. Jeroen Ann Neurol Research Articles OBJECTIVE: How hexanucleotide (GGGGCC) repeat expansions in C9ORF72 cause amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) remains poorly understood. Both gain‐ and loss‐of‐function mechanisms have been proposed. Evidence supporting these mechanisms in vivo is, however, incomplete. Here we determined the effect of C9orf72 loss‐of‐function in mice. METHODS: We generated and analyzed a conditional C9orf72 knockout mouse model. C9orf72(fl/fl) mice were crossed with Nestin‐Cre mice to selectively remove C9orf72 from neurons and glial cells. Immunohistochemistry was performed to study motor neurons and neuromuscular integrity, as well as several pathological hallmarks of ALS, such as gliosis and TDP‐43 mislocalization. In addition, motor function and survival were assessed. RESULTS: Neural‐specific ablation of C9orf72 in conditional C9orf72 knockout mice resulted in significantly reduced body weight but did not induce motor neuron degeneration, defects in motor function, or altered survival. INTERPRETATION: Our data suggest that C9orf72 loss‐of‐function, by itself, is insufficient to cause motor neuron disease. These results may have important implications for the development of therapeutic strategies for C9orf72‐associated ALS. Ann Neurol 2015;78:426–438 John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-07-03 2015-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4744979/ /pubmed/26044557 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ana.24453 Text en © 2015 The Authors Annals of Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Neurological Association. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Koppers, Max Blokhuis, Anna M. Westeneng, Henk‐Jan Terpstra, Margo L. Zundel, Caroline A. C. Vieira de Sá, Renata Schellevis, Raymond D. Waite, Adrian J. Blake, Derek J. Veldink, Jan H. van den Berg, Leonard H. Pasterkamp, R. Jeroen C9orf72 ablation in mice does not cause motor neuron degeneration or motor deficits |
title |
C9orf72 ablation in mice does not cause motor neuron degeneration or motor deficits |
title_full |
C9orf72 ablation in mice does not cause motor neuron degeneration or motor deficits |
title_fullStr |
C9orf72 ablation in mice does not cause motor neuron degeneration or motor deficits |
title_full_unstemmed |
C9orf72 ablation in mice does not cause motor neuron degeneration or motor deficits |
title_short |
C9orf72 ablation in mice does not cause motor neuron degeneration or motor deficits |
title_sort | c9orf72 ablation in mice does not cause motor neuron degeneration or motor deficits |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4744979/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26044557 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ana.24453 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT koppersmax c9orf72ablationinmicedoesnotcausemotorneurondegenerationormotordeficits AT blokhuisannam c9orf72ablationinmicedoesnotcausemotorneurondegenerationormotordeficits AT westenenghenkjan c9orf72ablationinmicedoesnotcausemotorneurondegenerationormotordeficits AT terpstramargol c9orf72ablationinmicedoesnotcausemotorneurondegenerationormotordeficits AT zundelcarolineac c9orf72ablationinmicedoesnotcausemotorneurondegenerationormotordeficits AT vieiradesarenata c9orf72ablationinmicedoesnotcausemotorneurondegenerationormotordeficits AT schellevisraymondd c9orf72ablationinmicedoesnotcausemotorneurondegenerationormotordeficits AT waiteadrianj c9orf72ablationinmicedoesnotcausemotorneurondegenerationormotordeficits AT blakederekj c9orf72ablationinmicedoesnotcausemotorneurondegenerationormotordeficits AT veldinkjanh c9orf72ablationinmicedoesnotcausemotorneurondegenerationormotordeficits AT vandenbergleonardh c9orf72ablationinmicedoesnotcausemotorneurondegenerationormotordeficits AT pasterkamprjeroen c9orf72ablationinmicedoesnotcausemotorneurondegenerationormotordeficits |