Cargando…
Talking about Relations: Factors Influencing the Production of Relational Descriptions
In a production experiment (Experiment 1) and an acceptability rating one (Experiment 2), we assessed two factors, spatial position and salience, which may influence the production of relational descriptions (such as “the ball between the man and the drawer”). In Experiment 1, speakers were asked to...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4746286/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26903911 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00103 |
_version_ | 1782414786773909504 |
---|---|
author | Baltaretu, Adriana Krahmer, Emiel J. van Wijk, Carel Maes, Alfons |
author_facet | Baltaretu, Adriana Krahmer, Emiel J. van Wijk, Carel Maes, Alfons |
author_sort | Baltaretu, Adriana |
collection | PubMed |
description | In a production experiment (Experiment 1) and an acceptability rating one (Experiment 2), we assessed two factors, spatial position and salience, which may influence the production of relational descriptions (such as “the ball between the man and the drawer”). In Experiment 1, speakers were asked to refer unambiguously to a target object (a ball). In Experiment 1a, we addressed the role of spatial position, more specifically if speakers mention the entity positioned leftmost in the scene as (first) relatum. The results showed a small preference to start with the left entity, which leaves room for other factors that could influence spatial reference. Thus, in the following studies, we varied salience systematically, by making one of the relatum candidates animate (Experiment 1b), and by adding attention capture cues, first subliminally by priming one relatum candidate with a flash (Experiment 1c), then explicitly by using salient colors for objects (Experiment 1d). Results indicate that spatial position played a dominant role. Entities on the left were mentioned more often as (first) relatum than those on the right (Experiments 1a–d). Animacy affected reference production in one out of three studies (in Experiment 1d). When salience was manipulated by priming visual attention or by using salient colors, there were no significant effects (Experiments 1c, d). In the acceptability rating study (Experiment 2), participants expressed their preference for specific relata, by ranking descriptions on the basis of how good they thought the descriptions fitted the scene. Results show that participants preferred most the description that had an animate entity as the first mentioned relatum. The relevance of these results for models of reference production is discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4746286 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47462862016-02-22 Talking about Relations: Factors Influencing the Production of Relational Descriptions Baltaretu, Adriana Krahmer, Emiel J. van Wijk, Carel Maes, Alfons Front Psychol Psychology In a production experiment (Experiment 1) and an acceptability rating one (Experiment 2), we assessed two factors, spatial position and salience, which may influence the production of relational descriptions (such as “the ball between the man and the drawer”). In Experiment 1, speakers were asked to refer unambiguously to a target object (a ball). In Experiment 1a, we addressed the role of spatial position, more specifically if speakers mention the entity positioned leftmost in the scene as (first) relatum. The results showed a small preference to start with the left entity, which leaves room for other factors that could influence spatial reference. Thus, in the following studies, we varied salience systematically, by making one of the relatum candidates animate (Experiment 1b), and by adding attention capture cues, first subliminally by priming one relatum candidate with a flash (Experiment 1c), then explicitly by using salient colors for objects (Experiment 1d). Results indicate that spatial position played a dominant role. Entities on the left were mentioned more often as (first) relatum than those on the right (Experiments 1a–d). Animacy affected reference production in one out of three studies (in Experiment 1d). When salience was manipulated by priming visual attention or by using salient colors, there were no significant effects (Experiments 1c, d). In the acceptability rating study (Experiment 2), participants expressed their preference for specific relata, by ranking descriptions on the basis of how good they thought the descriptions fitted the scene. Results show that participants preferred most the description that had an animate entity as the first mentioned relatum. The relevance of these results for models of reference production is discussed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4746286/ /pubmed/26903911 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00103 Text en Copyright © 2016 Baltaretu, Krahmer, van Wijk and Maes. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Baltaretu, Adriana Krahmer, Emiel J. van Wijk, Carel Maes, Alfons Talking about Relations: Factors Influencing the Production of Relational Descriptions |
title | Talking about Relations: Factors Influencing the Production of Relational Descriptions |
title_full | Talking about Relations: Factors Influencing the Production of Relational Descriptions |
title_fullStr | Talking about Relations: Factors Influencing the Production of Relational Descriptions |
title_full_unstemmed | Talking about Relations: Factors Influencing the Production of Relational Descriptions |
title_short | Talking about Relations: Factors Influencing the Production of Relational Descriptions |
title_sort | talking about relations: factors influencing the production of relational descriptions |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4746286/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26903911 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00103 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baltaretuadriana talkingaboutrelationsfactorsinfluencingtheproductionofrelationaldescriptions AT krahmeremielj talkingaboutrelationsfactorsinfluencingtheproductionofrelationaldescriptions AT vanwijkcarel talkingaboutrelationsfactorsinfluencingtheproductionofrelationaldescriptions AT maesalfons talkingaboutrelationsfactorsinfluencingtheproductionofrelationaldescriptions |