Cargando…

Self-Deception in Terminal Patients: Belief System at Stake

A substantial minority of patients with terminal illness hold unrealistically hopeful beliefs about the severity of their disease or the nature of its treatment, considering therapy as curative rather than palliative. We propose that this attitude may be understood as self-deception, following the c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Echarte, Luis E., Bernacer, Javier, Larrivee, Denis, Oron, J. V., Grijalba-Uche, Miguel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4746311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26903921
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00117
_version_ 1782414792473968640
author Echarte, Luis E.
Bernacer, Javier
Larrivee, Denis
Oron, J. V.
Grijalba-Uche, Miguel
author_facet Echarte, Luis E.
Bernacer, Javier
Larrivee, Denis
Oron, J. V.
Grijalba-Uche, Miguel
author_sort Echarte, Luis E.
collection PubMed
description A substantial minority of patients with terminal illness hold unrealistically hopeful beliefs about the severity of their disease or the nature of its treatment, considering therapy as curative rather than palliative. We propose that this attitude may be understood as self-deception, following the current psychological theories about this topic. In this article we suggest that the reason these patients deceive themselves is to preserve their belief systems. According to some philosophical accounts, the human belief system (HBS) is constituted as a web with a few stable central nodes – deep-seated beliefs – intimately related with the self. We hypothesize that the mind may possess defensive mechanisms, mostly non-conscious, that reject certain sensory inputs (e.g., a fatal diagnosis) that may undermine deep-seated beliefs. This interpretation is in line with the theory of cognitive dissonance. Following this reasoning, we also propose that HBS-related self-deception would entail a lower cognitive load than that associated with confronting the truth: whereas the latter would engage a myriad of high cognitive functions to re-configure crucial aspects of the self, including the setting of plans, goals, or even a behavioral output, the former would be mostly non-conscious. Overall, we believe that our research supports the hypothesis that in cases of terminal illness, (self-)deceiving requires less effort than accepting the truth.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4746311
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47463112016-02-22 Self-Deception in Terminal Patients: Belief System at Stake Echarte, Luis E. Bernacer, Javier Larrivee, Denis Oron, J. V. Grijalba-Uche, Miguel Front Psychol Psychology A substantial minority of patients with terminal illness hold unrealistically hopeful beliefs about the severity of their disease or the nature of its treatment, considering therapy as curative rather than palliative. We propose that this attitude may be understood as self-deception, following the current psychological theories about this topic. In this article we suggest that the reason these patients deceive themselves is to preserve their belief systems. According to some philosophical accounts, the human belief system (HBS) is constituted as a web with a few stable central nodes – deep-seated beliefs – intimately related with the self. We hypothesize that the mind may possess defensive mechanisms, mostly non-conscious, that reject certain sensory inputs (e.g., a fatal diagnosis) that may undermine deep-seated beliefs. This interpretation is in line with the theory of cognitive dissonance. Following this reasoning, we also propose that HBS-related self-deception would entail a lower cognitive load than that associated with confronting the truth: whereas the latter would engage a myriad of high cognitive functions to re-configure crucial aspects of the self, including the setting of plans, goals, or even a behavioral output, the former would be mostly non-conscious. Overall, we believe that our research supports the hypothesis that in cases of terminal illness, (self-)deceiving requires less effort than accepting the truth. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4746311/ /pubmed/26903921 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00117 Text en Copyright © 2016 Echarte, Bernacer, Larrivee, Oron and Grijalba-Uche. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Echarte, Luis E.
Bernacer, Javier
Larrivee, Denis
Oron, J. V.
Grijalba-Uche, Miguel
Self-Deception in Terminal Patients: Belief System at Stake
title Self-Deception in Terminal Patients: Belief System at Stake
title_full Self-Deception in Terminal Patients: Belief System at Stake
title_fullStr Self-Deception in Terminal Patients: Belief System at Stake
title_full_unstemmed Self-Deception in Terminal Patients: Belief System at Stake
title_short Self-Deception in Terminal Patients: Belief System at Stake
title_sort self-deception in terminal patients: belief system at stake
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4746311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26903921
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00117
work_keys_str_mv AT echarteluise selfdeceptioninterminalpatientsbeliefsystematstake
AT bernacerjavier selfdeceptioninterminalpatientsbeliefsystematstake
AT larriveedenis selfdeceptioninterminalpatientsbeliefsystematstake
AT oronjv selfdeceptioninterminalpatientsbeliefsystematstake
AT grijalbauchemiguel selfdeceptioninterminalpatientsbeliefsystematstake