Cargando…

Medication-related burden and patients’ lived experience with medicine: a systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative studies

OBJECTIVE: To explore medication-related burden (MRB) and patients’ lived experience with medicines (PLEM) without regard to particular medication therapies or medical conditions. DESIGN: Systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative studies. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, International Pharmac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohammed, Mohammed A, Moles, Rebekah J, Chen, Timothy F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4746464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26839015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010035
_version_ 1782414821504843776
author Mohammed, Mohammed A
Moles, Rebekah J
Chen, Timothy F
author_facet Mohammed, Mohammed A
Moles, Rebekah J
Chen, Timothy F
author_sort Mohammed, Mohammed A
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To explore medication-related burden (MRB) and patients’ lived experience with medicines (PLEM) without regard to particular medication therapies or medical conditions. DESIGN: Systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative studies. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, PsycINFO, Global health, CINAHL and Web of Science were searched from January 2000 to August 2014 using medication burden and patients’ lived experience terms. SYNTHESIS METHODS: Synthesis was undertaken following metaethnography methods and a comparative thematic analysis technique. RESULTS: 34 articles from 12 countries with a total of 1144 participants were included. 3 major inter-related themes emerged central to PLEM: MRB, medication related beliefs and medication taking practice. The negative impact of MRB, due to its interference on patients’ daily lives and effects on well-being, its influence on patients’ beliefs and behaviours, and a potential risk for drug-related problems (DRPs) was evident. This resulted in non-adherence and poorer outcomes (unachieved therapeutic goals and damage to patients’ health). Patients who experienced MRB interference in their life over time begin to juggle their medicines. Others continue their medicines despite experiencing MRB resulting in compromised physical, social or psychological well-being. CONCLUSIONS: There is a shared commonality of PLEM among the studies. MRB plays a central role in influencing patients’ health and well-being, beliefs and behaviour towards medicines. Given the complexity of MRB and its impact evident from this review, there is a need for healthcare practitioners to have insight into PLEM in therapeutic care plans. Understanding PLEM is an opportunity for practitioners to identify particular MRBs that patients encounter, and provide individualised care through selection of therapeutic care plans that suit a patient's life. This may assist in helping to achieve patients’ medication-related needs, and improve medication therapy and health outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4746464
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47464642016-02-12 Medication-related burden and patients’ lived experience with medicine: a systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative studies Mohammed, Mohammed A Moles, Rebekah J Chen, Timothy F BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: To explore medication-related burden (MRB) and patients’ lived experience with medicines (PLEM) without regard to particular medication therapies or medical conditions. DESIGN: Systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative studies. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, PsycINFO, Global health, CINAHL and Web of Science were searched from January 2000 to August 2014 using medication burden and patients’ lived experience terms. SYNTHESIS METHODS: Synthesis was undertaken following metaethnography methods and a comparative thematic analysis technique. RESULTS: 34 articles from 12 countries with a total of 1144 participants were included. 3 major inter-related themes emerged central to PLEM: MRB, medication related beliefs and medication taking practice. The negative impact of MRB, due to its interference on patients’ daily lives and effects on well-being, its influence on patients’ beliefs and behaviours, and a potential risk for drug-related problems (DRPs) was evident. This resulted in non-adherence and poorer outcomes (unachieved therapeutic goals and damage to patients’ health). Patients who experienced MRB interference in their life over time begin to juggle their medicines. Others continue their medicines despite experiencing MRB resulting in compromised physical, social or psychological well-being. CONCLUSIONS: There is a shared commonality of PLEM among the studies. MRB plays a central role in influencing patients’ health and well-being, beliefs and behaviour towards medicines. Given the complexity of MRB and its impact evident from this review, there is a need for healthcare practitioners to have insight into PLEM in therapeutic care plans. Understanding PLEM is an opportunity for practitioners to identify particular MRBs that patients encounter, and provide individualised care through selection of therapeutic care plans that suit a patient's life. This may assist in helping to achieve patients’ medication-related needs, and improve medication therapy and health outcomes. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4746464/ /pubmed/26839015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010035 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Mohammed, Mohammed A
Moles, Rebekah J
Chen, Timothy F
Medication-related burden and patients’ lived experience with medicine: a systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative studies
title Medication-related burden and patients’ lived experience with medicine: a systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative studies
title_full Medication-related burden and patients’ lived experience with medicine: a systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative studies
title_fullStr Medication-related burden and patients’ lived experience with medicine: a systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative studies
title_full_unstemmed Medication-related burden and patients’ lived experience with medicine: a systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative studies
title_short Medication-related burden and patients’ lived experience with medicine: a systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative studies
title_sort medication-related burden and patients’ lived experience with medicine: a systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative studies
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4746464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26839015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010035
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammedmohammeda medicationrelatedburdenandpatientslivedexperiencewithmedicineasystematicreviewandmetasynthesisofqualitativestudies
AT molesrebekahj medicationrelatedburdenandpatientslivedexperiencewithmedicineasystematicreviewandmetasynthesisofqualitativestudies
AT chentimothyf medicationrelatedburdenandpatientslivedexperiencewithmedicineasystematicreviewandmetasynthesisofqualitativestudies