Cargando…

Systemic lupus erythematosus and primary fibromyalgia can be distinguished by testing for cell-bound complement activation products

OBJECTIVE: We sought to establish the performance of cell-bound complement activation products (CB-CAPs) as a diagnostic tool to distinguish primary fibromyalgia (FM) from systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: A total of 75 SLE and 75 primary FM adult subjects who fulfilled appropriate classi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wallace, Daniel J, Silverman, Stuart L, Conklin, John, Barken, Derren, Dervieux, Thierry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4746498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26870391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2015-000127
_version_ 1782414825324806144
author Wallace, Daniel J
Silverman, Stuart L
Conklin, John
Barken, Derren
Dervieux, Thierry
author_facet Wallace, Daniel J
Silverman, Stuart L
Conklin, John
Barken, Derren
Dervieux, Thierry
author_sort Wallace, Daniel J
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We sought to establish the performance of cell-bound complement activation products (CB-CAPs) as a diagnostic tool to distinguish primary fibromyalgia (FM) from systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: A total of 75 SLE and 75 primary FM adult subjects who fulfilled appropriate classification criteria were enrolled prospectively. CB-CAPs (erythrocyte-C4d (EC4d) and B-lymphocyte-C4d (BC4d)) were determined by flow cytometry. Antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) were determined using indirect immunofluorescence while other autoantibodies were determined by solid-phase assays. The CB-CAPs in a multi-analyte assay with algorithm (MAAA) relied on two consecutive tiers of analysis that was reported as an overall positive or negative assessment. Test performance was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio (LR). RESULTS: ANAs yielded 80% positives for SLE and 33% positives for FM. High CB-CAP expression (EC4d >14 units or BC4d >60 units) was 43% sensitive and 96% specific for SLE. The CB-CAPs in MAAA assessment was evaluable in 138 of the 150 subjects enrolled (92%) and yielded 60% sensitivity (CI 95% 48% to 72%) for SLE with no FM patient testing positive (100% specificity). A positive test result was associated with a strong positive LR for SLE (>24, CI 95%; 6 to 102), while a negative test result was associated with a moderate negative LR (0.40; CI 95% 0.30 to 0.54). CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that CB-CAPs in MAAA can distinguish FM from SLE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4746498
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47464982016-02-11 Systemic lupus erythematosus and primary fibromyalgia can be distinguished by testing for cell-bound complement activation products Wallace, Daniel J Silverman, Stuart L Conklin, John Barken, Derren Dervieux, Thierry Lupus Sci Med Biomarker Studies OBJECTIVE: We sought to establish the performance of cell-bound complement activation products (CB-CAPs) as a diagnostic tool to distinguish primary fibromyalgia (FM) from systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: A total of 75 SLE and 75 primary FM adult subjects who fulfilled appropriate classification criteria were enrolled prospectively. CB-CAPs (erythrocyte-C4d (EC4d) and B-lymphocyte-C4d (BC4d)) were determined by flow cytometry. Antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) were determined using indirect immunofluorescence while other autoantibodies were determined by solid-phase assays. The CB-CAPs in a multi-analyte assay with algorithm (MAAA) relied on two consecutive tiers of analysis that was reported as an overall positive or negative assessment. Test performance was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio (LR). RESULTS: ANAs yielded 80% positives for SLE and 33% positives for FM. High CB-CAP expression (EC4d >14 units or BC4d >60 units) was 43% sensitive and 96% specific for SLE. The CB-CAPs in MAAA assessment was evaluable in 138 of the 150 subjects enrolled (92%) and yielded 60% sensitivity (CI 95% 48% to 72%) for SLE with no FM patient testing positive (100% specificity). A positive test result was associated with a strong positive LR for SLE (>24, CI 95%; 6 to 102), while a negative test result was associated with a moderate negative LR (0.40; CI 95% 0.30 to 0.54). CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that CB-CAPs in MAAA can distinguish FM from SLE. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4746498/ /pubmed/26870391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2015-000127 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Biomarker Studies
Wallace, Daniel J
Silverman, Stuart L
Conklin, John
Barken, Derren
Dervieux, Thierry
Systemic lupus erythematosus and primary fibromyalgia can be distinguished by testing for cell-bound complement activation products
title Systemic lupus erythematosus and primary fibromyalgia can be distinguished by testing for cell-bound complement activation products
title_full Systemic lupus erythematosus and primary fibromyalgia can be distinguished by testing for cell-bound complement activation products
title_fullStr Systemic lupus erythematosus and primary fibromyalgia can be distinguished by testing for cell-bound complement activation products
title_full_unstemmed Systemic lupus erythematosus and primary fibromyalgia can be distinguished by testing for cell-bound complement activation products
title_short Systemic lupus erythematosus and primary fibromyalgia can be distinguished by testing for cell-bound complement activation products
title_sort systemic lupus erythematosus and primary fibromyalgia can be distinguished by testing for cell-bound complement activation products
topic Biomarker Studies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4746498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26870391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2015-000127
work_keys_str_mv AT wallacedanielj systemiclupuserythematosusandprimaryfibromyalgiacanbedistinguishedbytestingforcellboundcomplementactivationproducts
AT silvermanstuartl systemiclupuserythematosusandprimaryfibromyalgiacanbedistinguishedbytestingforcellboundcomplementactivationproducts
AT conklinjohn systemiclupuserythematosusandprimaryfibromyalgiacanbedistinguishedbytestingforcellboundcomplementactivationproducts
AT barkenderren systemiclupuserythematosusandprimaryfibromyalgiacanbedistinguishedbytestingforcellboundcomplementactivationproducts
AT dervieuxthierry systemiclupuserythematosusandprimaryfibromyalgiacanbedistinguishedbytestingforcellboundcomplementactivationproducts