Cargando…

Validation of an integrated pedal desk and electronic behavior tracking platform

BACKGROUND: This study tested the validity of revolutions per minute (RPM) measurements from the Pennington Pedal Desk™. Forty-four participants (73 % female; 39 ± 11.4 years-old; BMI 25.8 ± 5.5 kg/m(2) [mean ± SD]) completed a standardized trial consisting of guided computer tasks while using a ped...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schuna, John M., Tudor-Locke, Catrine, Proença, Mahara, Barreira, Tiago V., Hsia, Daniel S., Pitta, Fabio, Vatsavai, Padma, Guidry, Richard D., Magnusen, Matthew R., Cowley, Amanda D., Martin, Corby K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4746820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26857115
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-1882-0
_version_ 1782414871021748224
author Schuna, John M.
Tudor-Locke, Catrine
Proença, Mahara
Barreira, Tiago V.
Hsia, Daniel S.
Pitta, Fabio
Vatsavai, Padma
Guidry, Richard D.
Magnusen, Matthew R.
Cowley, Amanda D.
Martin, Corby K.
author_facet Schuna, John M.
Tudor-Locke, Catrine
Proença, Mahara
Barreira, Tiago V.
Hsia, Daniel S.
Pitta, Fabio
Vatsavai, Padma
Guidry, Richard D.
Magnusen, Matthew R.
Cowley, Amanda D.
Martin, Corby K.
author_sort Schuna, John M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study tested the validity of revolutions per minute (RPM) measurements from the Pennington Pedal Desk™. Forty-four participants (73 % female; 39 ± 11.4 years-old; BMI 25.8 ± 5.5 kg/m(2) [mean ± SD]) completed a standardized trial consisting of guided computer tasks while using a pedal desk for approximately 20 min. Measures of RPM were concurrently collected by the pedal desk and the Garmin Vector power meter. After establishing the validity of RPM measurements with the Garmin Vector, we performed equivalence tests, quantified mean absolute percent error (MAPE), and constructed Bland–Altman plots to assess agreement between RPM measures from the pedal desk and the Garmin Vector (criterion) at the minute-by-minute and trial level (i.e., over the approximate 20 min trial period). RESULTS: The average (mean ± SD) duration of the pedal desk trial was 20.5 ± 2.5 min. Measures of RPM (mean ± SE) at the minute-by-minute (Garmin Vector: 54.8 ± 0.4 RPM; pedal desk: 55.8 ± 0.4 RPM) and trial level (Garmin Vector: 55.0 ± 1.7 RPM; pedal desk: 56.0 ± 1.7 RPM) were deemed equivalent. MAPE values for RPM measured by the pedal desk were small (minute-by-minute: 2.1 ± 0.1 %; trial: 1.8 ± 0.1 %) and no systematic relationships in error variance were evident by Bland–Altman plots. CONCLUSION: The Pennington Pedal Desk™ provides a valid count of RPM, providing an accurate metric to promote usage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4746820
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47468202016-02-10 Validation of an integrated pedal desk and electronic behavior tracking platform Schuna, John M. Tudor-Locke, Catrine Proença, Mahara Barreira, Tiago V. Hsia, Daniel S. Pitta, Fabio Vatsavai, Padma Guidry, Richard D. Magnusen, Matthew R. Cowley, Amanda D. Martin, Corby K. BMC Res Notes Research Article BACKGROUND: This study tested the validity of revolutions per minute (RPM) measurements from the Pennington Pedal Desk™. Forty-four participants (73 % female; 39 ± 11.4 years-old; BMI 25.8 ± 5.5 kg/m(2) [mean ± SD]) completed a standardized trial consisting of guided computer tasks while using a pedal desk for approximately 20 min. Measures of RPM were concurrently collected by the pedal desk and the Garmin Vector power meter. After establishing the validity of RPM measurements with the Garmin Vector, we performed equivalence tests, quantified mean absolute percent error (MAPE), and constructed Bland–Altman plots to assess agreement between RPM measures from the pedal desk and the Garmin Vector (criterion) at the minute-by-minute and trial level (i.e., over the approximate 20 min trial period). RESULTS: The average (mean ± SD) duration of the pedal desk trial was 20.5 ± 2.5 min. Measures of RPM (mean ± SE) at the minute-by-minute (Garmin Vector: 54.8 ± 0.4 RPM; pedal desk: 55.8 ± 0.4 RPM) and trial level (Garmin Vector: 55.0 ± 1.7 RPM; pedal desk: 56.0 ± 1.7 RPM) were deemed equivalent. MAPE values for RPM measured by the pedal desk were small (minute-by-minute: 2.1 ± 0.1 %; trial: 1.8 ± 0.1 %) and no systematic relationships in error variance were evident by Bland–Altman plots. CONCLUSION: The Pennington Pedal Desk™ provides a valid count of RPM, providing an accurate metric to promote usage. BioMed Central 2016-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4746820/ /pubmed/26857115 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-1882-0 Text en © Schuna Jr. et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schuna, John M.
Tudor-Locke, Catrine
Proença, Mahara
Barreira, Tiago V.
Hsia, Daniel S.
Pitta, Fabio
Vatsavai, Padma
Guidry, Richard D.
Magnusen, Matthew R.
Cowley, Amanda D.
Martin, Corby K.
Validation of an integrated pedal desk and electronic behavior tracking platform
title Validation of an integrated pedal desk and electronic behavior tracking platform
title_full Validation of an integrated pedal desk and electronic behavior tracking platform
title_fullStr Validation of an integrated pedal desk and electronic behavior tracking platform
title_full_unstemmed Validation of an integrated pedal desk and electronic behavior tracking platform
title_short Validation of an integrated pedal desk and electronic behavior tracking platform
title_sort validation of an integrated pedal desk and electronic behavior tracking platform
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4746820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26857115
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-1882-0
work_keys_str_mv AT schunajohnm validationofanintegratedpedaldeskandelectronicbehaviortrackingplatform
AT tudorlockecatrine validationofanintegratedpedaldeskandelectronicbehaviortrackingplatform
AT proencamahara validationofanintegratedpedaldeskandelectronicbehaviortrackingplatform
AT barreiratiagov validationofanintegratedpedaldeskandelectronicbehaviortrackingplatform
AT hsiadaniels validationofanintegratedpedaldeskandelectronicbehaviortrackingplatform
AT pittafabio validationofanintegratedpedaldeskandelectronicbehaviortrackingplatform
AT vatsavaipadma validationofanintegratedpedaldeskandelectronicbehaviortrackingplatform
AT guidryrichardd validationofanintegratedpedaldeskandelectronicbehaviortrackingplatform
AT magnusenmatthewr validationofanintegratedpedaldeskandelectronicbehaviortrackingplatform
AT cowleyamandad validationofanintegratedpedaldeskandelectronicbehaviortrackingplatform
AT martincorbyk validationofanintegratedpedaldeskandelectronicbehaviortrackingplatform