Cargando…

Effects of initial graft tension on clinical outcome after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of two graft tension protocols

BACKGROUND: In anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, there are great controversies concerning the ideal graft tension protocols. The purpose of this study was to clarify differences in the effect of two graft tension protocols on the clinical outcome after anatomic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kondo, Eiji, Yasuda, Kazunori, Kitamura, Nobuto, Onodera, Jun, Yokota, Masashi, Yagi, Tomonori, Iwasaki, Norimasa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4746831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26857109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-0909-y
_version_ 1782414873718685696
author Kondo, Eiji
Yasuda, Kazunori
Kitamura, Nobuto
Onodera, Jun
Yokota, Masashi
Yagi, Tomonori
Iwasaki, Norimasa
author_facet Kondo, Eiji
Yasuda, Kazunori
Kitamura, Nobuto
Onodera, Jun
Yokota, Masashi
Yagi, Tomonori
Iwasaki, Norimasa
author_sort Kondo, Eiji
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, there are great controversies concerning the ideal graft tension protocols. The purpose of this study was to clarify differences in the effect of two graft tension protocols on the clinical outcome after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction by comparing the minimum 2-year clinical results. METHODS: Ninety-seven patients with unilateral anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction were divided into two groups. In the first 44 patients (Group I), a 40-N tension was applied to each of the two hamstring autografts at 30° of knee flexion, and simultaneously fixed onto the tibia. In the remaining 53 patients (Group II), a 30-N tension was applied to each graft at 10° of knee flexion, and simultaneously fixed onto the tibia. Each patient was examined 2 years after surgery. RESULTS: There wasn’t a significant difference in the background of the two groups. There was no significant difference in the postoperative anterior laxity between the two groups. The average was 1.1 mm and 0.9 mm in Groups I and II, respectively. There wasn't any differences between the two groups in Lysholm knee score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) evaluation and muscle strength. Four patients had loss of knee extension in a range of 5° and 10° in Group I and none of the patients in Group II exhibited any loss in knee extension; which was statistically significant (p = 0.025). CONCLUSION: The two initial graft tension protocols did not result in any significant differences in the Lysholm knee score and IKDC grade. However, it was noted that the 40-N tension applied to each graft at 30° of knee flexion more significantly induced loss of knee extension in comparison to the 30-N tension applied to each graft at 10°. From a clinical viewpoint, the loss of knee extension is one of the pathological conditions that should be absolutely avoided after ACL reconstruction. Therefore, the 30-N tension applied to each graft at 10° is preferable to the other graft tension protocol.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4746831
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47468312016-02-10 Effects of initial graft tension on clinical outcome after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of two graft tension protocols Kondo, Eiji Yasuda, Kazunori Kitamura, Nobuto Onodera, Jun Yokota, Masashi Yagi, Tomonori Iwasaki, Norimasa BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: In anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, there are great controversies concerning the ideal graft tension protocols. The purpose of this study was to clarify differences in the effect of two graft tension protocols on the clinical outcome after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction by comparing the minimum 2-year clinical results. METHODS: Ninety-seven patients with unilateral anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction were divided into two groups. In the first 44 patients (Group I), a 40-N tension was applied to each of the two hamstring autografts at 30° of knee flexion, and simultaneously fixed onto the tibia. In the remaining 53 patients (Group II), a 30-N tension was applied to each graft at 10° of knee flexion, and simultaneously fixed onto the tibia. Each patient was examined 2 years after surgery. RESULTS: There wasn’t a significant difference in the background of the two groups. There was no significant difference in the postoperative anterior laxity between the two groups. The average was 1.1 mm and 0.9 mm in Groups I and II, respectively. There wasn't any differences between the two groups in Lysholm knee score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) evaluation and muscle strength. Four patients had loss of knee extension in a range of 5° and 10° in Group I and none of the patients in Group II exhibited any loss in knee extension; which was statistically significant (p = 0.025). CONCLUSION: The two initial graft tension protocols did not result in any significant differences in the Lysholm knee score and IKDC grade. However, it was noted that the 40-N tension applied to each graft at 30° of knee flexion more significantly induced loss of knee extension in comparison to the 30-N tension applied to each graft at 10°. From a clinical viewpoint, the loss of knee extension is one of the pathological conditions that should be absolutely avoided after ACL reconstruction. Therefore, the 30-N tension applied to each graft at 10° is preferable to the other graft tension protocol. BioMed Central 2016-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4746831/ /pubmed/26857109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-0909-y Text en © Kondo et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kondo, Eiji
Yasuda, Kazunori
Kitamura, Nobuto
Onodera, Jun
Yokota, Masashi
Yagi, Tomonori
Iwasaki, Norimasa
Effects of initial graft tension on clinical outcome after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of two graft tension protocols
title Effects of initial graft tension on clinical outcome after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of two graft tension protocols
title_full Effects of initial graft tension on clinical outcome after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of two graft tension protocols
title_fullStr Effects of initial graft tension on clinical outcome after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of two graft tension protocols
title_full_unstemmed Effects of initial graft tension on clinical outcome after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of two graft tension protocols
title_short Effects of initial graft tension on clinical outcome after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of two graft tension protocols
title_sort effects of initial graft tension on clinical outcome after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of two graft tension protocols
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4746831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26857109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-0909-y
work_keys_str_mv AT kondoeiji effectsofinitialgrafttensiononclinicaloutcomeafteranatomicdoublebundleanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioncomparisonoftwografttensionprotocols
AT yasudakazunori effectsofinitialgrafttensiononclinicaloutcomeafteranatomicdoublebundleanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioncomparisonoftwografttensionprotocols
AT kitamuranobuto effectsofinitialgrafttensiononclinicaloutcomeafteranatomicdoublebundleanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioncomparisonoftwografttensionprotocols
AT onoderajun effectsofinitialgrafttensiononclinicaloutcomeafteranatomicdoublebundleanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioncomparisonoftwografttensionprotocols
AT yokotamasashi effectsofinitialgrafttensiononclinicaloutcomeafteranatomicdoublebundleanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioncomparisonoftwografttensionprotocols
AT yagitomonori effectsofinitialgrafttensiononclinicaloutcomeafteranatomicdoublebundleanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioncomparisonoftwografttensionprotocols
AT iwasakinorimasa effectsofinitialgrafttensiononclinicaloutcomeafteranatomicdoublebundleanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioncomparisonoftwografttensionprotocols