Cargando…

Effects of Mentoring Speed Dating as an Innovative Matching Tool in Undergraduate Medical Education: A Mixed Methods Study

OBJECTIVES: Choosing the right mentor is crucial for effective mentorship. Yet, many medical students have difficulties finding a suitable mentor. Thus we developed mentoring speed dating (MSD) as a promising matching tool to connect students and faculty mentors successfully. The purpose of this stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guse, Jennifer, Schweigert, Eva, Kulms, Gerhild, Heinen, Ines, Martens, Claudia, Guse, Andreas H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4747568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26859845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147444
_version_ 1782415004530638848
author Guse, Jennifer
Schweigert, Eva
Kulms, Gerhild
Heinen, Ines
Martens, Claudia
Guse, Andreas H.
author_facet Guse, Jennifer
Schweigert, Eva
Kulms, Gerhild
Heinen, Ines
Martens, Claudia
Guse, Andreas H.
author_sort Guse, Jennifer
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Choosing the right mentor is crucial for effective mentorship. Yet, many medical students have difficulties finding a suitable mentor. Thus we developed mentoring speed dating (MSD) as a promising matching tool to connect students and faculty mentors successfully. The purpose of this study was to explore mentees’ and mentors’ experience with MSD and investigate the impact of MSD on the perceived mentorship quality and continuance of the mentoring relationship. METHODS: The authors completed a mixed methods study at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany, between June 2011 and March 2014. They conducted four focus groups with mentees and mentors who participated in a mentoring speed dating event and analyzed transcripts using conventional content analysis with inductive categorizing. In addition, three mentoring cohorts (two matched via MSD, one matched via conventional online profiles) were surveyed on mentorship satisfaction and the 1-year continuance of their mentorship was monitored. Fifteen mentees and fifteen mentors participated in the focus groups. The authors identified several themes such as short and long term benefits of MSD and fulfillment of expectations. Benefits included finding out about the personal connection, matching expectations, providing an efficient overview of candidates. The survey was completed by 93 students (n = 29 without MSD; n = 64 with MSD). Independent t-tests and multivariate analysis of variance were used to analyze the impact of MSD on student’s mentorship satisfaction. RESULTS: There were significant differences in responses to the items “Commitment of mentor” (p = .019) and “Constructive feedback” (p = .038) among the students who attended MSD and the students without MSD. After one year far more mentoring relationships existed among those mentees who participated in MSD in comparison to the “no MSD group”. CONCLUSION: MSD is a valuable matching tool with beneficial effects on the mentorship quality. It enhances essential factors in the mentoring relationship such as commitment and satisfaction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4747568
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47475682016-02-22 Effects of Mentoring Speed Dating as an Innovative Matching Tool in Undergraduate Medical Education: A Mixed Methods Study Guse, Jennifer Schweigert, Eva Kulms, Gerhild Heinen, Ines Martens, Claudia Guse, Andreas H. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: Choosing the right mentor is crucial for effective mentorship. Yet, many medical students have difficulties finding a suitable mentor. Thus we developed mentoring speed dating (MSD) as a promising matching tool to connect students and faculty mentors successfully. The purpose of this study was to explore mentees’ and mentors’ experience with MSD and investigate the impact of MSD on the perceived mentorship quality and continuance of the mentoring relationship. METHODS: The authors completed a mixed methods study at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany, between June 2011 and March 2014. They conducted four focus groups with mentees and mentors who participated in a mentoring speed dating event and analyzed transcripts using conventional content analysis with inductive categorizing. In addition, three mentoring cohorts (two matched via MSD, one matched via conventional online profiles) were surveyed on mentorship satisfaction and the 1-year continuance of their mentorship was monitored. Fifteen mentees and fifteen mentors participated in the focus groups. The authors identified several themes such as short and long term benefits of MSD and fulfillment of expectations. Benefits included finding out about the personal connection, matching expectations, providing an efficient overview of candidates. The survey was completed by 93 students (n = 29 without MSD; n = 64 with MSD). Independent t-tests and multivariate analysis of variance were used to analyze the impact of MSD on student’s mentorship satisfaction. RESULTS: There were significant differences in responses to the items “Commitment of mentor” (p = .019) and “Constructive feedback” (p = .038) among the students who attended MSD and the students without MSD. After one year far more mentoring relationships existed among those mentees who participated in MSD in comparison to the “no MSD group”. CONCLUSION: MSD is a valuable matching tool with beneficial effects on the mentorship quality. It enhances essential factors in the mentoring relationship such as commitment and satisfaction. Public Library of Science 2016-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4747568/ /pubmed/26859845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147444 Text en © 2016 Guse et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Guse, Jennifer
Schweigert, Eva
Kulms, Gerhild
Heinen, Ines
Martens, Claudia
Guse, Andreas H.
Effects of Mentoring Speed Dating as an Innovative Matching Tool in Undergraduate Medical Education: A Mixed Methods Study
title Effects of Mentoring Speed Dating as an Innovative Matching Tool in Undergraduate Medical Education: A Mixed Methods Study
title_full Effects of Mentoring Speed Dating as an Innovative Matching Tool in Undergraduate Medical Education: A Mixed Methods Study
title_fullStr Effects of Mentoring Speed Dating as an Innovative Matching Tool in Undergraduate Medical Education: A Mixed Methods Study
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Mentoring Speed Dating as an Innovative Matching Tool in Undergraduate Medical Education: A Mixed Methods Study
title_short Effects of Mentoring Speed Dating as an Innovative Matching Tool in Undergraduate Medical Education: A Mixed Methods Study
title_sort effects of mentoring speed dating as an innovative matching tool in undergraduate medical education: a mixed methods study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4747568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26859845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147444
work_keys_str_mv AT gusejennifer effectsofmentoringspeeddatingasaninnovativematchingtoolinundergraduatemedicaleducationamixedmethodsstudy
AT schweigerteva effectsofmentoringspeeddatingasaninnovativematchingtoolinundergraduatemedicaleducationamixedmethodsstudy
AT kulmsgerhild effectsofmentoringspeeddatingasaninnovativematchingtoolinundergraduatemedicaleducationamixedmethodsstudy
AT heinenines effectsofmentoringspeeddatingasaninnovativematchingtoolinundergraduatemedicaleducationamixedmethodsstudy
AT martensclaudia effectsofmentoringspeeddatingasaninnovativematchingtoolinundergraduatemedicaleducationamixedmethodsstudy
AT guseandreash effectsofmentoringspeeddatingasaninnovativematchingtoolinundergraduatemedicaleducationamixedmethodsstudy