Cargando…
Covered versus Uncovered Self-Expandable Metal Stents for Managing Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction: A Meta-Analysis
AIM: To compare the efficacy of using covered self-expandable metal stents (CSEMSs) and uncovered self-expandable metal stents (UCSEMSs) to treat objective jaundice caused by an unresectable malignant tumor. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive electronic search from 1980 to May 2015. All randomize...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4747571/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26859673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149066 |
_version_ | 1782415005251010560 |
---|---|
author | Li, Jinjin Li, Tong Sun, Ping Yu, Qihong Wang, Kun Chang, Weilong Song, Zifang Zheng, Qichang |
author_facet | Li, Jinjin Li, Tong Sun, Ping Yu, Qihong Wang, Kun Chang, Weilong Song, Zifang Zheng, Qichang |
author_sort | Li, Jinjin |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To compare the efficacy of using covered self-expandable metal stents (CSEMSs) and uncovered self-expandable metal stents (UCSEMSs) to treat objective jaundice caused by an unresectable malignant tumor. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive electronic search from 1980 to May 2015. All randomized controlled trials comparing the use of CSEMSs and UCSEMSs to treat malignant distal biliary obstruction were included. RESULTS: The analysis included 1417 patients enrolled in 14 trials. We did not detect significant differences between the UCSEMS group and the CSEMS group in terms of cumulative stent patency (hazard ratio (HR) 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19–4.53; p = 0.93, I(2) = 0%), patient survival (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.05–10.87; p = 0.85, I(2) = 0%), overall stent dysfunction (relative ratio (RR) 0.85, M-H, random, 95% CI 0.57–1.25; p = 0.83, I(2) = 63%), the overall complication rate (RR 1.26, M-H, fixed, 95% CI 0.94–1.68; p = 0.12, I(2) = 0%) or the change in serum bilirubin (weighted mean difference (WMD) -0.13, IV fixed, 95% CI 0.56–0.3; p = 0.55, I(2) = 0%). However, we did detect a significant difference in the main causes of stent dysfunction between the two groups. In particular, the CSEMS group exhibited a lower rate of tumor ingrowth (RR 0.25, M-H, random, 95% CI 0.12–0.52; p = 0.002, I(2) = 40%) but a higher rate of tumor overgrowth (RR 1.76, M-H, fixed, 95% CI 1.03–3.02; p = 0.04, I(2) = 0%). Patients with CSEMSs also exhibited a higher migration rate (RR 9.33, M-H, fixed, 95% CI 2.54–34.24; p = 0.008, I(2) = 0%) and a higher rate of sludge formation (RR 2.47, M-H, fixed, 95% CI 1.36–4.50; p = 0.003, I(2) = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis indicates that there is no significant difference in primary stent patency and stent dysfunction between CSEMSs and UCSEMSs during the period from primary stent insertion to primary stent dysfunction or patient death. However, when taking further management for occluded stents into consideration, CSEMSs is a better choice for patients with malignant biliary obstruction due to their removability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4747571 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47475712016-02-22 Covered versus Uncovered Self-Expandable Metal Stents for Managing Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction: A Meta-Analysis Li, Jinjin Li, Tong Sun, Ping Yu, Qihong Wang, Kun Chang, Weilong Song, Zifang Zheng, Qichang PLoS One Research Article AIM: To compare the efficacy of using covered self-expandable metal stents (CSEMSs) and uncovered self-expandable metal stents (UCSEMSs) to treat objective jaundice caused by an unresectable malignant tumor. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive electronic search from 1980 to May 2015. All randomized controlled trials comparing the use of CSEMSs and UCSEMSs to treat malignant distal biliary obstruction were included. RESULTS: The analysis included 1417 patients enrolled in 14 trials. We did not detect significant differences between the UCSEMS group and the CSEMS group in terms of cumulative stent patency (hazard ratio (HR) 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19–4.53; p = 0.93, I(2) = 0%), patient survival (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.05–10.87; p = 0.85, I(2) = 0%), overall stent dysfunction (relative ratio (RR) 0.85, M-H, random, 95% CI 0.57–1.25; p = 0.83, I(2) = 63%), the overall complication rate (RR 1.26, M-H, fixed, 95% CI 0.94–1.68; p = 0.12, I(2) = 0%) or the change in serum bilirubin (weighted mean difference (WMD) -0.13, IV fixed, 95% CI 0.56–0.3; p = 0.55, I(2) = 0%). However, we did detect a significant difference in the main causes of stent dysfunction between the two groups. In particular, the CSEMS group exhibited a lower rate of tumor ingrowth (RR 0.25, M-H, random, 95% CI 0.12–0.52; p = 0.002, I(2) = 40%) but a higher rate of tumor overgrowth (RR 1.76, M-H, fixed, 95% CI 1.03–3.02; p = 0.04, I(2) = 0%). Patients with CSEMSs also exhibited a higher migration rate (RR 9.33, M-H, fixed, 95% CI 2.54–34.24; p = 0.008, I(2) = 0%) and a higher rate of sludge formation (RR 2.47, M-H, fixed, 95% CI 1.36–4.50; p = 0.003, I(2) = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis indicates that there is no significant difference in primary stent patency and stent dysfunction between CSEMSs and UCSEMSs during the period from primary stent insertion to primary stent dysfunction or patient death. However, when taking further management for occluded stents into consideration, CSEMSs is a better choice for patients with malignant biliary obstruction due to their removability. Public Library of Science 2016-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4747571/ /pubmed/26859673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149066 Text en © 2016 Li et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Li, Jinjin Li, Tong Sun, Ping Yu, Qihong Wang, Kun Chang, Weilong Song, Zifang Zheng, Qichang Covered versus Uncovered Self-Expandable Metal Stents for Managing Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction: A Meta-Analysis |
title | Covered versus Uncovered Self-Expandable Metal Stents for Managing Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Covered versus Uncovered Self-Expandable Metal Stents for Managing Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction: A Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Covered versus Uncovered Self-Expandable Metal Stents for Managing Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Covered versus Uncovered Self-Expandable Metal Stents for Managing Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction: A Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Covered versus Uncovered Self-Expandable Metal Stents for Managing Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction: A Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | covered versus uncovered self-expandable metal stents for managing malignant distal biliary obstruction: a meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4747571/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26859673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149066 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lijinjin coveredversusuncoveredselfexpandablemetalstentsformanagingmalignantdistalbiliaryobstructionametaanalysis AT litong coveredversusuncoveredselfexpandablemetalstentsformanagingmalignantdistalbiliaryobstructionametaanalysis AT sunping coveredversusuncoveredselfexpandablemetalstentsformanagingmalignantdistalbiliaryobstructionametaanalysis AT yuqihong coveredversusuncoveredselfexpandablemetalstentsformanagingmalignantdistalbiliaryobstructionametaanalysis AT wangkun coveredversusuncoveredselfexpandablemetalstentsformanagingmalignantdistalbiliaryobstructionametaanalysis AT changweilong coveredversusuncoveredselfexpandablemetalstentsformanagingmalignantdistalbiliaryobstructionametaanalysis AT songzifang coveredversusuncoveredselfexpandablemetalstentsformanagingmalignantdistalbiliaryobstructionametaanalysis AT zhengqichang coveredversusuncoveredselfexpandablemetalstentsformanagingmalignantdistalbiliaryobstructionametaanalysis |