Cargando…

Covered versus Uncovered Self-Expandable Metal Stents for Managing Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction: A Meta-Analysis

AIM: To compare the efficacy of using covered self-expandable metal stents (CSEMSs) and uncovered self-expandable metal stents (UCSEMSs) to treat objective jaundice caused by an unresectable malignant tumor. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive electronic search from 1980 to May 2015. All randomize...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Jinjin, Li, Tong, Sun, Ping, Yu, Qihong, Wang, Kun, Chang, Weilong, Song, Zifang, Zheng, Qichang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4747571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26859673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149066
_version_ 1782415005251010560
author Li, Jinjin
Li, Tong
Sun, Ping
Yu, Qihong
Wang, Kun
Chang, Weilong
Song, Zifang
Zheng, Qichang
author_facet Li, Jinjin
Li, Tong
Sun, Ping
Yu, Qihong
Wang, Kun
Chang, Weilong
Song, Zifang
Zheng, Qichang
author_sort Li, Jinjin
collection PubMed
description AIM: To compare the efficacy of using covered self-expandable metal stents (CSEMSs) and uncovered self-expandable metal stents (UCSEMSs) to treat objective jaundice caused by an unresectable malignant tumor. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive electronic search from 1980 to May 2015. All randomized controlled trials comparing the use of CSEMSs and UCSEMSs to treat malignant distal biliary obstruction were included. RESULTS: The analysis included 1417 patients enrolled in 14 trials. We did not detect significant differences between the UCSEMS group and the CSEMS group in terms of cumulative stent patency (hazard ratio (HR) 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19–4.53; p = 0.93, I(2) = 0%), patient survival (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.05–10.87; p = 0.85, I(2) = 0%), overall stent dysfunction (relative ratio (RR) 0.85, M-H, random, 95% CI 0.57–1.25; p = 0.83, I(2) = 63%), the overall complication rate (RR 1.26, M-H, fixed, 95% CI 0.94–1.68; p = 0.12, I(2) = 0%) or the change in serum bilirubin (weighted mean difference (WMD) -0.13, IV fixed, 95% CI 0.56–0.3; p = 0.55, I(2) = 0%). However, we did detect a significant difference in the main causes of stent dysfunction between the two groups. In particular, the CSEMS group exhibited a lower rate of tumor ingrowth (RR 0.25, M-H, random, 95% CI 0.12–0.52; p = 0.002, I(2) = 40%) but a higher rate of tumor overgrowth (RR 1.76, M-H, fixed, 95% CI 1.03–3.02; p = 0.04, I(2) = 0%). Patients with CSEMSs also exhibited a higher migration rate (RR 9.33, M-H, fixed, 95% CI 2.54–34.24; p = 0.008, I(2) = 0%) and a higher rate of sludge formation (RR 2.47, M-H, fixed, 95% CI 1.36–4.50; p = 0.003, I(2) = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis indicates that there is no significant difference in primary stent patency and stent dysfunction between CSEMSs and UCSEMSs during the period from primary stent insertion to primary stent dysfunction or patient death. However, when taking further management for occluded stents into consideration, CSEMSs is a better choice for patients with malignant biliary obstruction due to their removability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4747571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47475712016-02-22 Covered versus Uncovered Self-Expandable Metal Stents for Managing Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction: A Meta-Analysis Li, Jinjin Li, Tong Sun, Ping Yu, Qihong Wang, Kun Chang, Weilong Song, Zifang Zheng, Qichang PLoS One Research Article AIM: To compare the efficacy of using covered self-expandable metal stents (CSEMSs) and uncovered self-expandable metal stents (UCSEMSs) to treat objective jaundice caused by an unresectable malignant tumor. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive electronic search from 1980 to May 2015. All randomized controlled trials comparing the use of CSEMSs and UCSEMSs to treat malignant distal biliary obstruction were included. RESULTS: The analysis included 1417 patients enrolled in 14 trials. We did not detect significant differences between the UCSEMS group and the CSEMS group in terms of cumulative stent patency (hazard ratio (HR) 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19–4.53; p = 0.93, I(2) = 0%), patient survival (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.05–10.87; p = 0.85, I(2) = 0%), overall stent dysfunction (relative ratio (RR) 0.85, M-H, random, 95% CI 0.57–1.25; p = 0.83, I(2) = 63%), the overall complication rate (RR 1.26, M-H, fixed, 95% CI 0.94–1.68; p = 0.12, I(2) = 0%) or the change in serum bilirubin (weighted mean difference (WMD) -0.13, IV fixed, 95% CI 0.56–0.3; p = 0.55, I(2) = 0%). However, we did detect a significant difference in the main causes of stent dysfunction between the two groups. In particular, the CSEMS group exhibited a lower rate of tumor ingrowth (RR 0.25, M-H, random, 95% CI 0.12–0.52; p = 0.002, I(2) = 40%) but a higher rate of tumor overgrowth (RR 1.76, M-H, fixed, 95% CI 1.03–3.02; p = 0.04, I(2) = 0%). Patients with CSEMSs also exhibited a higher migration rate (RR 9.33, M-H, fixed, 95% CI 2.54–34.24; p = 0.008, I(2) = 0%) and a higher rate of sludge formation (RR 2.47, M-H, fixed, 95% CI 1.36–4.50; p = 0.003, I(2) = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis indicates that there is no significant difference in primary stent patency and stent dysfunction between CSEMSs and UCSEMSs during the period from primary stent insertion to primary stent dysfunction or patient death. However, when taking further management for occluded stents into consideration, CSEMSs is a better choice for patients with malignant biliary obstruction due to their removability. Public Library of Science 2016-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4747571/ /pubmed/26859673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149066 Text en © 2016 Li et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Jinjin
Li, Tong
Sun, Ping
Yu, Qihong
Wang, Kun
Chang, Weilong
Song, Zifang
Zheng, Qichang
Covered versus Uncovered Self-Expandable Metal Stents for Managing Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction: A Meta-Analysis
title Covered versus Uncovered Self-Expandable Metal Stents for Managing Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Covered versus Uncovered Self-Expandable Metal Stents for Managing Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Covered versus Uncovered Self-Expandable Metal Stents for Managing Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Covered versus Uncovered Self-Expandable Metal Stents for Managing Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Covered versus Uncovered Self-Expandable Metal Stents for Managing Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort covered versus uncovered self-expandable metal stents for managing malignant distal biliary obstruction: a meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4747571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26859673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149066
work_keys_str_mv AT lijinjin coveredversusuncoveredselfexpandablemetalstentsformanagingmalignantdistalbiliaryobstructionametaanalysis
AT litong coveredversusuncoveredselfexpandablemetalstentsformanagingmalignantdistalbiliaryobstructionametaanalysis
AT sunping coveredversusuncoveredselfexpandablemetalstentsformanagingmalignantdistalbiliaryobstructionametaanalysis
AT yuqihong coveredversusuncoveredselfexpandablemetalstentsformanagingmalignantdistalbiliaryobstructionametaanalysis
AT wangkun coveredversusuncoveredselfexpandablemetalstentsformanagingmalignantdistalbiliaryobstructionametaanalysis
AT changweilong coveredversusuncoveredselfexpandablemetalstentsformanagingmalignantdistalbiliaryobstructionametaanalysis
AT songzifang coveredversusuncoveredselfexpandablemetalstentsformanagingmalignantdistalbiliaryobstructionametaanalysis
AT zhengqichang coveredversusuncoveredselfexpandablemetalstentsformanagingmalignantdistalbiliaryobstructionametaanalysis