Cargando…
Expert Opinions on Improving Femicide Data Collection across Europe: A Concept Mapping Study
Femicide, defined as the killings of females by males because they are females, is becoming recognized worldwide as an important ongoing manifestation of gender inequality. Despite its high prevalence or widespread prevalence, only a few countries have specific registries about this issue. This stud...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4747603/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26859885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148364 |
_version_ | 1782415012499816448 |
---|---|
author | Vives-Cases, Carmen Goicolea, Isabel Hernández, Alison Sanz-Barbero, Belen Gill, Aisha K. Baldry, Anna Costanza Schröttle, Monika Stoeckl, Heidi |
author_facet | Vives-Cases, Carmen Goicolea, Isabel Hernández, Alison Sanz-Barbero, Belen Gill, Aisha K. Baldry, Anna Costanza Schröttle, Monika Stoeckl, Heidi |
author_sort | Vives-Cases, Carmen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Femicide, defined as the killings of females by males because they are females, is becoming recognized worldwide as an important ongoing manifestation of gender inequality. Despite its high prevalence or widespread prevalence, only a few countries have specific registries about this issue. This study aims to assemble expert opinion regarding the strategies which might feasibly be employed to promote, develop and implement an integrated and differentiated femicide data collection system in Europe at both the national and international levels. Concept mapping methodology was followed, involving 28 experts from 16 countries in generating strategies, sorting and rating them with respect to relevance and feasibility. The experts involved were all members of the EU-Cost-Action on femicide, which is a scientific network of experts on femicide and violence against women across Europe. As a result, a conceptual map emerged, consisting of 69 strategies organized in 10 clusters, which fit into two domains: “Political action” and “Technical steps”. There was consensus among participants regarding the high relevance of strategies to institutionalize national databases and raise public awareness through different stakeholders, while strategies to promote media involvement were identified as the most feasible. Differences in perceived priorities according to the level of human development index of the experts’ countries were also observed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4747603 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47476032016-02-22 Expert Opinions on Improving Femicide Data Collection across Europe: A Concept Mapping Study Vives-Cases, Carmen Goicolea, Isabel Hernández, Alison Sanz-Barbero, Belen Gill, Aisha K. Baldry, Anna Costanza Schröttle, Monika Stoeckl, Heidi PLoS One Research Article Femicide, defined as the killings of females by males because they are females, is becoming recognized worldwide as an important ongoing manifestation of gender inequality. Despite its high prevalence or widespread prevalence, only a few countries have specific registries about this issue. This study aims to assemble expert opinion regarding the strategies which might feasibly be employed to promote, develop and implement an integrated and differentiated femicide data collection system in Europe at both the national and international levels. Concept mapping methodology was followed, involving 28 experts from 16 countries in generating strategies, sorting and rating them with respect to relevance and feasibility. The experts involved were all members of the EU-Cost-Action on femicide, which is a scientific network of experts on femicide and violence against women across Europe. As a result, a conceptual map emerged, consisting of 69 strategies organized in 10 clusters, which fit into two domains: “Political action” and “Technical steps”. There was consensus among participants regarding the high relevance of strategies to institutionalize national databases and raise public awareness through different stakeholders, while strategies to promote media involvement were identified as the most feasible. Differences in perceived priorities according to the level of human development index of the experts’ countries were also observed. Public Library of Science 2016-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4747603/ /pubmed/26859885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148364 Text en © 2016 Vives-Cases et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Vives-Cases, Carmen Goicolea, Isabel Hernández, Alison Sanz-Barbero, Belen Gill, Aisha K. Baldry, Anna Costanza Schröttle, Monika Stoeckl, Heidi Expert Opinions on Improving Femicide Data Collection across Europe: A Concept Mapping Study |
title | Expert Opinions on Improving Femicide Data Collection across Europe: A Concept Mapping Study |
title_full | Expert Opinions on Improving Femicide Data Collection across Europe: A Concept Mapping Study |
title_fullStr | Expert Opinions on Improving Femicide Data Collection across Europe: A Concept Mapping Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Expert Opinions on Improving Femicide Data Collection across Europe: A Concept Mapping Study |
title_short | Expert Opinions on Improving Femicide Data Collection across Europe: A Concept Mapping Study |
title_sort | expert opinions on improving femicide data collection across europe: a concept mapping study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4747603/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26859885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148364 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vivescasescarmen expertopinionsonimprovingfemicidedatacollectionacrosseuropeaconceptmappingstudy AT goicoleaisabel expertopinionsonimprovingfemicidedatacollectionacrosseuropeaconceptmappingstudy AT hernandezalison expertopinionsonimprovingfemicidedatacollectionacrosseuropeaconceptmappingstudy AT sanzbarberobelen expertopinionsonimprovingfemicidedatacollectionacrosseuropeaconceptmappingstudy AT gillaishak expertopinionsonimprovingfemicidedatacollectionacrosseuropeaconceptmappingstudy AT baldryannacostanza expertopinionsonimprovingfemicidedatacollectionacrosseuropeaconceptmappingstudy AT schrottlemonika expertopinionsonimprovingfemicidedatacollectionacrosseuropeaconceptmappingstudy AT stoecklheidi expertopinionsonimprovingfemicidedatacollectionacrosseuropeaconceptmappingstudy |