Cargando…

Vitamin D and Colorectal, Breast, and Prostate Cancers: A Review of the Epidemiological Evidence

Over the past two decades, the question of whether vitamin D has a role in cancer incidence, progression, and mortality has been studied in detail. Colorectal, breast, and prostate cancers have been a particular area of focus; together, these three malignancies account for approximately 35% of cance...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jacobs, Elizabeth T., Kohler, Lindsay N., Kunihiro, Andrew G., Jurutka, Peter W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ivyspring International Publisher 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4747876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26918035
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.13403
_version_ 1782415022641643520
author Jacobs, Elizabeth T.
Kohler, Lindsay N.
Kunihiro, Andrew G.
Jurutka, Peter W.
author_facet Jacobs, Elizabeth T.
Kohler, Lindsay N.
Kunihiro, Andrew G.
Jurutka, Peter W.
author_sort Jacobs, Elizabeth T.
collection PubMed
description Over the past two decades, the question of whether vitamin D has a role in cancer incidence, progression, and mortality has been studied in detail. Colorectal, breast, and prostate cancers have been a particular area of focus; together, these three malignancies account for approximately 35% of cancer cases and 20% of cancer deaths in the United States, and as such are a major public health concern. Herein, we review and synthesize the epidemiological research regarding vitamin D, as measured by the biomarker 25-hydroxycholecalciferol [25(OH)D], and the incidence, progression, and mortality of these cancers. Overall, the results of observational studies of the relationship between 25(OH)D and colorectal cancer have revealed a consistent inverse association for incidence and mortality; while for breast cancer, results have generally demonstrated a relationship between higher 25(OH)D and lower risk for progression and mortality. In contrast, randomized, double-blind clinical trials conducted to date have generally failed to support these findings. For prostate cancer, there is no convincing evidence of an association between 25(OH)D and incidence, and inconsistent data for progression and mortality, though results of one open label clinical trial suggest that supplementation with 4000 IU/d of vitamin D(3 )may inhibit progression of the disease. Nonetheless, until the results of additional ongoing randomized, double-blind clinical trials are reported, it will be difficult to ascertain if vitamin D itself is related to a reduction in risk for some cancer endpoints, or whether high concentrations of the vitamin D biomarker 25(OH)D may instead serve as a marker for an overall beneficial risk factor profile.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4747876
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Ivyspring International Publisher
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47478762016-02-25 Vitamin D and Colorectal, Breast, and Prostate Cancers: A Review of the Epidemiological Evidence Jacobs, Elizabeth T. Kohler, Lindsay N. Kunihiro, Andrew G. Jurutka, Peter W. J Cancer Review Over the past two decades, the question of whether vitamin D has a role in cancer incidence, progression, and mortality has been studied in detail. Colorectal, breast, and prostate cancers have been a particular area of focus; together, these three malignancies account for approximately 35% of cancer cases and 20% of cancer deaths in the United States, and as such are a major public health concern. Herein, we review and synthesize the epidemiological research regarding vitamin D, as measured by the biomarker 25-hydroxycholecalciferol [25(OH)D], and the incidence, progression, and mortality of these cancers. Overall, the results of observational studies of the relationship between 25(OH)D and colorectal cancer have revealed a consistent inverse association for incidence and mortality; while for breast cancer, results have generally demonstrated a relationship between higher 25(OH)D and lower risk for progression and mortality. In contrast, randomized, double-blind clinical trials conducted to date have generally failed to support these findings. For prostate cancer, there is no convincing evidence of an association between 25(OH)D and incidence, and inconsistent data for progression and mortality, though results of one open label clinical trial suggest that supplementation with 4000 IU/d of vitamin D(3 )may inhibit progression of the disease. Nonetheless, until the results of additional ongoing randomized, double-blind clinical trials are reported, it will be difficult to ascertain if vitamin D itself is related to a reduction in risk for some cancer endpoints, or whether high concentrations of the vitamin D biomarker 25(OH)D may instead serve as a marker for an overall beneficial risk factor profile. Ivyspring International Publisher 2016-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4747876/ /pubmed/26918035 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.13403 Text en © Ivyspring International Publisher. Reproduction is permitted for personal, noncommercial use, provided that the article is in whole, unmodified, and properly cited. See http://ivyspring.com/terms for terms and conditions.
spellingShingle Review
Jacobs, Elizabeth T.
Kohler, Lindsay N.
Kunihiro, Andrew G.
Jurutka, Peter W.
Vitamin D and Colorectal, Breast, and Prostate Cancers: A Review of the Epidemiological Evidence
title Vitamin D and Colorectal, Breast, and Prostate Cancers: A Review of the Epidemiological Evidence
title_full Vitamin D and Colorectal, Breast, and Prostate Cancers: A Review of the Epidemiological Evidence
title_fullStr Vitamin D and Colorectal, Breast, and Prostate Cancers: A Review of the Epidemiological Evidence
title_full_unstemmed Vitamin D and Colorectal, Breast, and Prostate Cancers: A Review of the Epidemiological Evidence
title_short Vitamin D and Colorectal, Breast, and Prostate Cancers: A Review of the Epidemiological Evidence
title_sort vitamin d and colorectal, breast, and prostate cancers: a review of the epidemiological evidence
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4747876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26918035
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.13403
work_keys_str_mv AT jacobselizabetht vitamindandcolorectalbreastandprostatecancersareviewoftheepidemiologicalevidence
AT kohlerlindsayn vitamindandcolorectalbreastandprostatecancersareviewoftheepidemiologicalevidence
AT kunihiroandrewg vitamindandcolorectalbreastandprostatecancersareviewoftheepidemiologicalevidence
AT jurutkapeterw vitamindandcolorectalbreastandprostatecancersareviewoftheepidemiologicalevidence