Cargando…

Predicting Prostate Biopsy Results Using a Panel of Plasma and Urine Biomarkers Combined in a Scoring System

Background: Determining the need for prostate biopsy is frequently difficult and more objective criteria are needed to predict the presence of high grade prostate cancer (PCa). To reduce the rate of unnecessary biopsies, we explored the potential of using biomarkers in urine and plasma to develop a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Albitar, Maher, Ma, Wanlong, Lund, Lars, Albitar, Ferras, Diep, Kevin, Fritsche, Herbert A., Shore, Neal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ivyspring International Publisher 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4747884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26918043
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.12771
_version_ 1782415024449388544
author Albitar, Maher
Ma, Wanlong
Lund, Lars
Albitar, Ferras
Diep, Kevin
Fritsche, Herbert A.
Shore, Neal
author_facet Albitar, Maher
Ma, Wanlong
Lund, Lars
Albitar, Ferras
Diep, Kevin
Fritsche, Herbert A.
Shore, Neal
author_sort Albitar, Maher
collection PubMed
description Background: Determining the need for prostate biopsy is frequently difficult and more objective criteria are needed to predict the presence of high grade prostate cancer (PCa). To reduce the rate of unnecessary biopsies, we explored the potential of using biomarkers in urine and plasma to develop a scoring system to predict prostate biopsy results and the presence of high grade PCa. Methods: Urine and plasma specimens were collected from 319 patients recommended for prostate biopsies. We measured the gene expression levels of UAP1, PDLIM5, IMPDH2, HSPD1, PCA3, PSA, TMPRSS2, ERG, GAPDH, B2M, AR, and PTEN in plasma and urine. Patient age, serum prostate-specific antigen (sPSA) level, and biomarkers data were used to develop two independent algorithms, one for predicting the presence of PCa and the other for predicting high-grade PCa (Gleason score [GS] ≥7). Results: Using training and validation data sets, a model for predicting the outcome of PCa biopsy was developed with an area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.87. The positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) were 87% and 63%, respectively. We then developed a second algorithm to identify patients with high-grade PCa (GS ≥7). This algorithm's AUROC was 0.80, and had a PPV and NPV of 56% and 77%, respectively. Patients who demonstrated concordant results using both algorithms showed a sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 93% for predicting high-grade aggressive PCa. Thus, the use of both algorithms resulted in a PPV of 90% and NPV of 89% for predicting high-grade PCa with toleration of some low-grade PCa (GS <7) being detected. Conclusions: This model of a biomarker panel with algorithmic interpretation can be used as a “liquid biopsy” to reduce the need for unnecessary tissue biopsies, and help to guide appropriate treatment decisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4747884
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Ivyspring International Publisher
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47478842016-02-25 Predicting Prostate Biopsy Results Using a Panel of Plasma and Urine Biomarkers Combined in a Scoring System Albitar, Maher Ma, Wanlong Lund, Lars Albitar, Ferras Diep, Kevin Fritsche, Herbert A. Shore, Neal J Cancer Research Paper Background: Determining the need for prostate biopsy is frequently difficult and more objective criteria are needed to predict the presence of high grade prostate cancer (PCa). To reduce the rate of unnecessary biopsies, we explored the potential of using biomarkers in urine and plasma to develop a scoring system to predict prostate biopsy results and the presence of high grade PCa. Methods: Urine and plasma specimens were collected from 319 patients recommended for prostate biopsies. We measured the gene expression levels of UAP1, PDLIM5, IMPDH2, HSPD1, PCA3, PSA, TMPRSS2, ERG, GAPDH, B2M, AR, and PTEN in plasma and urine. Patient age, serum prostate-specific antigen (sPSA) level, and biomarkers data were used to develop two independent algorithms, one for predicting the presence of PCa and the other for predicting high-grade PCa (Gleason score [GS] ≥7). Results: Using training and validation data sets, a model for predicting the outcome of PCa biopsy was developed with an area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.87. The positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) were 87% and 63%, respectively. We then developed a second algorithm to identify patients with high-grade PCa (GS ≥7). This algorithm's AUROC was 0.80, and had a PPV and NPV of 56% and 77%, respectively. Patients who demonstrated concordant results using both algorithms showed a sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 93% for predicting high-grade aggressive PCa. Thus, the use of both algorithms resulted in a PPV of 90% and NPV of 89% for predicting high-grade PCa with toleration of some low-grade PCa (GS <7) being detected. Conclusions: This model of a biomarker panel with algorithmic interpretation can be used as a “liquid biopsy” to reduce the need for unnecessary tissue biopsies, and help to guide appropriate treatment decisions. Ivyspring International Publisher 2016-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4747884/ /pubmed/26918043 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.12771 Text en © Ivyspring International Publisher. Reproduction is permitted for personal, noncommercial use, provided that the article is in whole, unmodified, and properly cited. See http://ivyspring.com/terms for terms and conditions.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Albitar, Maher
Ma, Wanlong
Lund, Lars
Albitar, Ferras
Diep, Kevin
Fritsche, Herbert A.
Shore, Neal
Predicting Prostate Biopsy Results Using a Panel of Plasma and Urine Biomarkers Combined in a Scoring System
title Predicting Prostate Biopsy Results Using a Panel of Plasma and Urine Biomarkers Combined in a Scoring System
title_full Predicting Prostate Biopsy Results Using a Panel of Plasma and Urine Biomarkers Combined in a Scoring System
title_fullStr Predicting Prostate Biopsy Results Using a Panel of Plasma and Urine Biomarkers Combined in a Scoring System
title_full_unstemmed Predicting Prostate Biopsy Results Using a Panel of Plasma and Urine Biomarkers Combined in a Scoring System
title_short Predicting Prostate Biopsy Results Using a Panel of Plasma and Urine Biomarkers Combined in a Scoring System
title_sort predicting prostate biopsy results using a panel of plasma and urine biomarkers combined in a scoring system
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4747884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26918043
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.12771
work_keys_str_mv AT albitarmaher predictingprostatebiopsyresultsusingapanelofplasmaandurinebiomarkerscombinedinascoringsystem
AT mawanlong predictingprostatebiopsyresultsusingapanelofplasmaandurinebiomarkerscombinedinascoringsystem
AT lundlars predictingprostatebiopsyresultsusingapanelofplasmaandurinebiomarkerscombinedinascoringsystem
AT albitarferras predictingprostatebiopsyresultsusingapanelofplasmaandurinebiomarkerscombinedinascoringsystem
AT diepkevin predictingprostatebiopsyresultsusingapanelofplasmaandurinebiomarkerscombinedinascoringsystem
AT fritscheherberta predictingprostatebiopsyresultsusingapanelofplasmaandurinebiomarkerscombinedinascoringsystem
AT shoreneal predictingprostatebiopsyresultsusingapanelofplasmaandurinebiomarkerscombinedinascoringsystem