Cargando…

Immunologic response in treatment-naïve HIV-2-infected patients: the IeDEA West Africa cohort

INTRODUCTION: Response to antiretroviral therapy (ART) among individuals infected with HIV-2 is poorly described. We compared the immunological response among patients treated with three nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) to boosted protease inhibitor (PI) and unboosted PI-based reg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Balestre, Eric, Ekouevi, Didier Koumavi, Tchounga, Boris, Eholie, Serge Paul, Messou, Eugène, Sawadogo, Adrien, Thiébaut, Rodolphe, May, Margaret T, Sterne, Jonathan Ac, Dabis, François
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International AIDS Society 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4748109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26861115
http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.19.1.20044
_version_ 1782415066086244352
author Balestre, Eric
Ekouevi, Didier Koumavi
Tchounga, Boris
Eholie, Serge Paul
Messou, Eugène
Sawadogo, Adrien
Thiébaut, Rodolphe
May, Margaret T
Sterne, Jonathan Ac
Dabis, François
author_facet Balestre, Eric
Ekouevi, Didier Koumavi
Tchounga, Boris
Eholie, Serge Paul
Messou, Eugène
Sawadogo, Adrien
Thiébaut, Rodolphe
May, Margaret T
Sterne, Jonathan Ac
Dabis, François
author_sort Balestre, Eric
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Response to antiretroviral therapy (ART) among individuals infected with HIV-2 is poorly described. We compared the immunological response among patients treated with three nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) to boosted protease inhibitor (PI) and unboosted PI-based regimens in West Africa. METHODS: This prospective cohort study enrolled treatment-naïve HIV-2-infected patients within the International Epidemiological Databases to Evaluate AIDS collaboration in West Africa. We used mixed models to compare the CD4 count response to treatment over 12 months between regimens. RESULTS: Of 422 HIV-2-infected patients, 285 (67.5%) were treated with a boosted PI-based regimen, 104 (24.6%) with an unboosted PI-based regimen and 33 (7.8%) with three NRTIs. Treatment groups were comparable with regard to gender (54.5% female) and median age at ART initiation (45.3 years; interquartile range 38.3 to 51.8). Treatment groups differed by clinical stage (21.2%, 16.8% and 17.3% at CDC Stage C or World Health Organization Stage IV for the triple NRTI, boosted PI and unboosted PI groups, respectively, p=0.02), median length of follow-up (12.9, 17.7 and 44.0 months for the triple NRTI, the boosted PI and the unboosted PI groups, respectively, p<0.001) and baseline median CD4 count (192, 173 and 129 cells/µl in the triple NRTI, the boosted PI and the unboosted PI-based regimen groups, respectively, p=0.003). CD4 count recovery at 12 months was higher for patients treated with boosted PI-based regimens than those treated with three NRTIs or with unboosted PI-based regimens (191 cells/µl, 95% CI 142 to 241; 110 cells/µl, 95% CI 29 to 192; 133 cells/µl, 95% CI 80 to 186, respectively, p=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: In this observational study using African data, boosted PI-containing regimens had better immunological response compared to triple NRTI combinations and unboosted PI-based regimens at 12 months. A randomized clinical trial is still required to determine the best initial regimen for treating HIV-2 infected patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4748109
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher International AIDS Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47481092016-02-10 Immunologic response in treatment-naïve HIV-2-infected patients: the IeDEA West Africa cohort Balestre, Eric Ekouevi, Didier Koumavi Tchounga, Boris Eholie, Serge Paul Messou, Eugène Sawadogo, Adrien Thiébaut, Rodolphe May, Margaret T Sterne, Jonathan Ac Dabis, François J Int AIDS Soc Research INTRODUCTION: Response to antiretroviral therapy (ART) among individuals infected with HIV-2 is poorly described. We compared the immunological response among patients treated with three nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) to boosted protease inhibitor (PI) and unboosted PI-based regimens in West Africa. METHODS: This prospective cohort study enrolled treatment-naïve HIV-2-infected patients within the International Epidemiological Databases to Evaluate AIDS collaboration in West Africa. We used mixed models to compare the CD4 count response to treatment over 12 months between regimens. RESULTS: Of 422 HIV-2-infected patients, 285 (67.5%) were treated with a boosted PI-based regimen, 104 (24.6%) with an unboosted PI-based regimen and 33 (7.8%) with three NRTIs. Treatment groups were comparable with regard to gender (54.5% female) and median age at ART initiation (45.3 years; interquartile range 38.3 to 51.8). Treatment groups differed by clinical stage (21.2%, 16.8% and 17.3% at CDC Stage C or World Health Organization Stage IV for the triple NRTI, boosted PI and unboosted PI groups, respectively, p=0.02), median length of follow-up (12.9, 17.7 and 44.0 months for the triple NRTI, the boosted PI and the unboosted PI groups, respectively, p<0.001) and baseline median CD4 count (192, 173 and 129 cells/µl in the triple NRTI, the boosted PI and the unboosted PI-based regimen groups, respectively, p=0.003). CD4 count recovery at 12 months was higher for patients treated with boosted PI-based regimens than those treated with three NRTIs or with unboosted PI-based regimens (191 cells/µl, 95% CI 142 to 241; 110 cells/µl, 95% CI 29 to 192; 133 cells/µl, 95% CI 80 to 186, respectively, p=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: In this observational study using African data, boosted PI-containing regimens had better immunological response compared to triple NRTI combinations and unboosted PI-based regimens at 12 months. A randomized clinical trial is still required to determine the best initial regimen for treating HIV-2 infected patients. International AIDS Society 2016-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4748109/ /pubmed/26861115 http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.19.1.20044 Text en © 2016 Balestre E et al; licensee International AIDS Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Balestre, Eric
Ekouevi, Didier Koumavi
Tchounga, Boris
Eholie, Serge Paul
Messou, Eugène
Sawadogo, Adrien
Thiébaut, Rodolphe
May, Margaret T
Sterne, Jonathan Ac
Dabis, François
Immunologic response in treatment-naïve HIV-2-infected patients: the IeDEA West Africa cohort
title Immunologic response in treatment-naïve HIV-2-infected patients: the IeDEA West Africa cohort
title_full Immunologic response in treatment-naïve HIV-2-infected patients: the IeDEA West Africa cohort
title_fullStr Immunologic response in treatment-naïve HIV-2-infected patients: the IeDEA West Africa cohort
title_full_unstemmed Immunologic response in treatment-naïve HIV-2-infected patients: the IeDEA West Africa cohort
title_short Immunologic response in treatment-naïve HIV-2-infected patients: the IeDEA West Africa cohort
title_sort immunologic response in treatment-naïve hiv-2-infected patients: the iedea west africa cohort
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4748109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26861115
http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.19.1.20044
work_keys_str_mv AT balestreeric immunologicresponseintreatmentnaivehiv2infectedpatientstheiedeawestafricacohort
AT ekouevididierkoumavi immunologicresponseintreatmentnaivehiv2infectedpatientstheiedeawestafricacohort
AT tchoungaboris immunologicresponseintreatmentnaivehiv2infectedpatientstheiedeawestafricacohort
AT eholiesergepaul immunologicresponseintreatmentnaivehiv2infectedpatientstheiedeawestafricacohort
AT messoueugene immunologicresponseintreatmentnaivehiv2infectedpatientstheiedeawestafricacohort
AT sawadogoadrien immunologicresponseintreatmentnaivehiv2infectedpatientstheiedeawestafricacohort
AT thiebautrodolphe immunologicresponseintreatmentnaivehiv2infectedpatientstheiedeawestafricacohort
AT maymargarett immunologicresponseintreatmentnaivehiv2infectedpatientstheiedeawestafricacohort
AT sternejonathanac immunologicresponseintreatmentnaivehiv2infectedpatientstheiedeawestafricacohort
AT dabisfrancois immunologicresponseintreatmentnaivehiv2infectedpatientstheiedeawestafricacohort
AT immunologicresponseintreatmentnaivehiv2infectedpatientstheiedeawestafricacohort